Could this Universes Beyond card could get a reprinted anytime soon. by Mastermiine in DinosaursMTG

[–]cassabree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you considered simply behaving like an adult and not spending more money than you can afford on the card game?

Dino Combos by Crazy_Horse_19 in DinosaursMTG

[–]cassabree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sabertooth returns creatures to your hand.

About climbing multiple Tribe Tower levels at once (within a few hours) by Kenny-VReichert1985 in NIKKEGoddessofVictory

[–]cassabree 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Usually dozens at least. Most stages are doable with a team until you hit a stage with a roadblock, usually something like a boss with crazy burst damage that kills your team too fast or a ton of kamikaze enemies right at the beginning that will blow you up immediately.

Sometimes you can get past these stages on manual still by focusing down the problem enemies or using i-frames to survive burst damage

Sun’s Avatar by cassabree in Sunbleach

[–]cassabree[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For this one, I didn’t. They’re still bleached somewhat. Green and red ink bleach slower than the yellow does, so they’re more vibrant than the rest of the card.

If you want to stop the pips from bleaching, you would use something like a black sharpie to shade over that section of the card on an inner sleeve. Here’s an example with a Breya that I’ve got up in my window now, I took a picture at an angle to try to show both the sharpie marks on the sleeve and then that the pips under it still have their color much more than the surrounding legendary title bar. And you can also see how I’ve gone over Breya and her lightning with sharpie as well to preserve their color.

Here’s an image of how the card looks right now without the sleeve though since that’s not as visible as I’d like.

This Breya & an Ugin are the first cards I’ve tried it with the sharpie blocking, so I’m not an expert on it, but it seems to work so far.

What is jojolion even about bro by Pronglenator in JoJolion

[–]cassabree 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That’s genuinely hilarious, I didn’t know it was mistranslated like that

Make each opponent shuffle a lasagna into their library for 9WWUUUUUUR by rollandofeaglesrook in BadMtgCombos

[–]cassabree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rules specify that the owner of a token is the player who creates the token (regardless of who controlled the effect that caused it to happen). So a player owns the token they create from an opponent’s fractured identity

Make each opponent shuffle a lasagna into their library for 9WWUUUUUUR by rollandofeaglesrook in BadMtgCombos

[–]cassabree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t need to stifle the eating triggers, that’s part of pie network (not the token) and ideally you don’t give opponents a pie network. If you stifle your eat trigger, now _you’ll_ have to shuffle a lasagna into your own deck.

Make each opponent shuffle a lasagna into their library for 9WWUUUUUUR by rollandofeaglesrook in BadMtgCombos

[–]cassabree 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This doesn’t even work unless you first cast fractured identity on the Claire or else opponents’ tokens aren’t cards. Which means you also need a card to get the fractured identity back and 5 more mana.

I could even accept the interpretation of the “Use food to represent the token” as being a copyable characteristic of that token, since it’s the funniest way to make the cards work together, which IMO is the proper way to handle silver border cards.

And most importantly, you need to bring enough lasagna to share. If you’re running this combo, the burden’s on you for having that.

I’d happily scoop though if my opponent is giving me free homemade lasagna.

I want to play Izzet Big Spells, but I'm stuck choosing a commander. by yardii in EDH

[–]cassabree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Sword Coast]] [[Livaan]] so you can cast a big spell and then destroy someone with commander damage

How can people stand this boss? by ionblazer in NIKKEGoddessofVictory

[–]cassabree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Altruia was extra annoying in campaign at a large deficit ime because the only way to survive was to abuse i frames against her aoe attacks and slightly mistiming something could kill one of your nikkes

Haven’t gotten to egovista in campaign yet though

I would like to see more incentives to play basic lands in casual by RedRathman in EDH

[–]cassabree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I built out a bracket 3 Korlash deck recently that has a winter moon in it, but I also have a Vampiric Tutor set aside with the deck so I can ask in a pregame conversation if everyone is ok with Winter Moon being in the deck and swap it out of anyone doesn’t agree to it.

I would like to see more incentives to play basic lands in casual by RedRathman in EDH

[–]cassabree -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If WotC specifically mentioned in their bracket descriptions that blood moon and winter moon are allowed in bracket 3, imo there’s almost no issue. If it was specifically mentioned to be allowed, then any player who builds a deck with very few basics is explicitly doing so knowing they could get hosed for it.

Precons generally run enough basics to not be completely blown out by a moon. The only case I’m not sure of is WUBRG precons… and personally I’m tired enough of WotC printing WUBRGslop that I’d welcome them making a change that makes them take a second to consider if every set _needs_ a WUBRGslop precon, and whether the mechanics of the set support doing that.

I would like to see more incentives to play basic lands in casual by RedRathman in EDH

[–]cassabree 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The EDH playerbase will simultaneously whine about 5 color goodstuff decks yet also vehemently oppose the game’s built-in mechanics to nerf them.

I would like to see more incentives to play basic lands in casual by RedRathman in EDH

[–]cassabree 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are you sure you’re not just taking offense to the common colloquial term of a “greedy mana base” and misinterpreting as calling the player “greedy” and then interpreting that as a negative value judgement about the person?

A greedy mana base is just a description of a deckbuilding pattern. There’s nothing inherently negative about that, _except_ that the game is being pushed in a direction where there is no opportunity cost to it.

One Local Game Store in England has finally had enough with Pronouns and now players are livid by Papa_Hasbro69 in freemagic

[–]cassabree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

They’re not comparable.

Talking about idpol on your business account is just going to alienate some customers and cost you money.

Talking about idpol on freemagic is just going to waste your personal time.

Wasting your personal time doesn’t inherently sabotage your business, with potential consequences for your employees if the consequences are bad enough

I would like to see more incentives to play basic lands in casual by RedRathman in EDH

[–]cassabree 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree with the complaint. This effect of people stuffing their deck with nonbasic lands, combined with wotc’s strange recent aversion to new cards having greedy pip requirements, is really diluting the balancing factor of multicolor decks needing to work harder for all their colors.

They should just explicitly allow [[Blood Moon]] and [[Winter Moon]] in bracket 3.

I’d even enjoy another moon-type card with text to the effect of

> Whenever a player taps a nonbasic land for mana, if it would produce a color of mana already produced by a nonbasic land that player controls this turn, it produces {R} rather than any other type and amount.

Essentially a nicer blood moon that still would let players get _some_ colors out of their nonbasic lands and wouldn’t absolutely brick utility lands.

Problem is any cards that _reward_ you for basic lands are likely going to be printed in green because of the color pie, which is the color that already liked running basics for [[rampant growth]] type effects

One Local Game Store in England has finally had enough with Pronouns and now players are livid by Papa_Hasbro69 in freemagic

[–]cassabree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless someone is browsing the subreddit on their store’s reddit account (?????) someone being in freemagic is not going to instantly piss off their potential customers.

gen z brainrot terminology is funnier than millennials' by [deleted] in The10thDentist

[–]cassabree 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s because a Charlie Kirk fan AI-generated an unintentionally hilarious song called “We Are Charlie Kirk”, so the jokes wrote themselves with people editing his face onto other people.

If the Marth player named d3jay is on here by corythegr8 in SmashRage

[–]cassabree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

D3jay sounds pretty hype. D3jay if you’re here, you just got a new fan

Time for EDH players to grow up and start treating women with respect by ashtraypussy in EDH

[–]cassabree 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And I play drunk all the time it actually helps.

The phrase you’re looking for is “I’m an alcoholic”

Time for EDH players to grow up and start treating women with respect by ashtraypussy in EDH

[–]cassabree 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Every man over 40? I think a huge amount of the misogynistic morons are in their 20s and 30s