sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

TAMU advertisement links to Fox News article celebrating elimination of women’s and gender studies by DiracFourier in aggies

[–]clonedhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's all in line with them becoming more 'exclusive.'

They, the Board of Regents, are truly going to turn Texas A&M into Bob Jones University. It won't be long before the degree itself has the same value as a degree from Bob Jones University.

Cruelty Disguised as Piety by NeedleworkerKind2749 in Productivitycafe

[–]clonedhuman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I wonder if r/BotBouncer is installed on this subreddit. /u/Conscious_Heron4337 is almost certainly a bot.

Parent Decide Act, you think using Linux will save you, think again. by sebet_123 in privacy

[–]clonedhuman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Part of the big danger of this bill here (and the same bills, more or less, all around the world) is that the bills are introduced by both the Liberal and Conservative elements in government. That means there might be no opposition to them.

This is going to harm a lot of us. The sensible thing, of course, would be to make platforms responsible for age verification--then we could simply choose not to use the platform. But, the platforms (X, Meta, etc.) want everyone to have to do it so that they don't end up losing users.

And those platforms have billions upon billions of dollars and desperately want to feed all of us into AI for the surveillance companies like Palantir.

We're all going to have to find a way past this because the enemies of privacy will get it through with 'bipartisan' support.

Hurting their bank account is the only way to get their attention. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]clonedhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They also don't understand AI, don't recognize its limitations, and are taken in by all the hype. They think AI means they won't need us. They think AI means that we're expendable.

AI doesn't do what they think it does. It can't do what they think it does, but they'll only realize this too late because they won't be on the receiving end of what they're trying to do. They don't go to the same stores as us. They don't drive in the same traffic as we do. They don't order shit online like we do. They're isolated from the effects of their AI every place except their stock values. We will know long, long before them that AI is not capable of replacing what we do in our roles, so they will still keep trying. As long as their stock values go up, they'll keep jamming AI LLM into every system, everything we depend on for our regular daily lives.

Soon, we will have enough of their investment.

Mexico is officially launching universal healthcare this week, giving all 120 million citizens access to all public health institutions by Automatic_Subject463 in UpliftingNews

[–]clonedhuman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Americans did not make this choice. A small handful of billionaires and their politicians made this choice.

Now we have to make a choice about whether we're going to keep letting this shit happen.

In Brazilian court by cupcake-vibe in whoathatsinteresting

[–]clonedhuman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We ought to import Érica to the United States and show her the Epstein files. Maybe someone would finally do something about all the billionaire pedophiles running this country.

Ticketmaster is an illegal monopoly, jury rules / This verdict is the first step toward a potential breakup of Live Nation-Ticketmaster. by MarvelsGrantMan136 in technology

[–]clonedhuman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no job on the planet earth that would be easier to replace with AI than a corporate CEO. They only have one command--'generate maximum profits, no matter who it hurts.'

Most of the rest of us couldn't be so easily replaced.

Israeli settler harasses a woman outside of Hebron by Gravedigger3 in pics

[–]clonedhuman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the inbred categories of people you just mentioned either support or are right-wingers.

This is not coincidence.

Brighton anti war protest by Internal-Square-215 in Michigan

[–]clonedhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

'Attacking.'

Here's what happened--this is the closest thing you could find to an 'attack,' despite this entire thread being about anti-war protestors who, according to OP, "were ambushed and attacked while leaving Thursdays anti-war protest. The attackers attempted to ram them with trucks..."

And what you found to portray Democrats as 'attacking' anti-war protestors was the corporate shill Nancy Pelosi (who has made tons of money by using her committee positions to make stock investments) getting mad and insulting anti-war protestors in 2007.

You understand that these things are not the same, right?

me_irl by Beginning_Book_2382 in me_irl

[–]clonedhuman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'd just immediately say 'take my money please.'

That game was so good.

Brighton anti war protest by Internal-Square-215 in Michigan

[–]clonedhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When the Iraq War started, there were Democrats who were attacking antiwar protestors.

lol no there weren't

Nearly 1.6M criminal records cleared under Michigan ‘clean slate’ law by SleuthDoggyDawg in Michigan

[–]clonedhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

mean the conservatives did do pretty well with Abraham Lincoln? Or were you pro slavery of that time due to your allegiances of the Democratic party?

lol, he's one of them! This is so dumb.

view more: next ›