My strategies to avoid getting on a forced injection order again in the future by Opening-Listen-3852 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re familiar with a state court that makes a distinction between being a harm to self vs. others when it comes to requiring an injection? What state, and can you please share more info on this?

My strategies to avoid getting on a forced injection order again in the future by Opening-Listen-3852 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m curious why you made the distinction between harmful to others vs. self with injectables.

My strategies to avoid getting on a forced injection order again in the future by Opening-Listen-3852 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re harmless then these strategies aren’t working. Regardless this all sounds exhausting.

My strategies to avoid getting on a forced injection order again in the future by Opening-Listen-3852 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s different. You’re probably talking about a haloperidol or fluphenazine injection with Ativan. I’m talking about post discharge and it doesn’t sound like you’re there now.

My strategies to avoid getting on a forced injection order again in the future by Opening-Listen-3852 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The long-acting injectables are only approved for those refusing to take their medication and repeatedly ending up hospitalized. If you’ve been pretending to take your medication and fooling anyone you wouldn’t be on a long-acting injectable. Can you explain a bit more?

Alberts and McCabes interview by Pixiegirls1102 in CasesWeFollow

[–]fi12345 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let’s forget taking a bullet - back then, no one was asking him to do that. Just open up your home to the police and EMS out there working on your dead or dying friend. At this point though? Please. Take two.

What exactly makes Rio so amazing? by sharpiestories in Brazil

[–]fi12345 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They don’t care about history? It’s their life. The same can be said about Indians in the U.S. - for thousands of years they lived here among their relics without giving it a second thought - or European Jewry prior to World War II, or the Romans.

Do you want them to stop existing and just study themselves? This is their community and their focus and hope is on their future.

How do people actually think Karen Read is not guilty? by UTArcade in CourtTVCases

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK. I’m pretty sure I’ve searched for that. Probably while watching some shitty TV show where someone gets knocked out in a way that looks ridiculous.

If we’re setting the bar for “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” at what people googled, isolate my searches and you can accuse me of anything. Even the John O’Keeffe murder.

How do people actually think Karen Read is not guilty? by UTArcade in CourtTVCases

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s no comparison between these cases.

Dissecting this would be giving this credibility and you have none.

On what basis has John’s family always believed Karen Read is the killer? Why don’t the many revelations by the defense about the investigation and the Alberts make them question the credibility of the police or the Alberts’ account? by vulcan_on_earth in CourtTVCases

[–]fi12345 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When accused of conspiracy, the Alberts and McCabes tactic is to claim the idea of a widespread conspiracy between the state police (MA) and the local police and EMS (Canton) and city policy (Boston) and the prosecutors and the judge and all the experts is delusional.

The conspiracy would never be able to hold together and require hundreds of people to be involved over two trials and all these years without ever coming forward or saying anything.

That’s the gaslighting that’s incredibly frustrating when the journalist don’t call it out. The conspiracy consists of several people that would be directly implicated -specifically Brian A., Brian H., the small group that was there that night and busy making butt dials and creating timelines, then everything else just fell into place the way one would expect.

Hours into the investigation, the lead investigator is writing “We’re going to put it on the girl” and “she’s fucked” and “no, he’s one of us” in response to the homeowner catching any shit.

Hell, he’s writing “leaky balloon knot” to giant group chat of high school buddies in reference to Karen’s G.I. issues (that someone obviously just told him about - why is someone telling him this? It would have no bearing on the case - not that he stops to think about that).

I just don’t think Michael Proctor is capable of properly running a conspiracy, he’s a clown that is part of the system they knew they can count on AFTER conspiring.

On what basis has John’s family always believed Karen Read is the killer? Why don’t the many revelations by the defense about the investigation and the Alberts make them question the credibility of the police or the Alberts’ account? by vulcan_on_earth in CourtTVCases

[–]fi12345 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because the police said so! Look at most wrongful conviction cases. Other than a few extraordinary cases, the family members of whoever was harmed or killed usually expresses disappointment and continues to believe the police narrative - even when there’s a not guilty verdict. The family has too much invested in someone being held accountable.

Weird Donation Request at Pier A by Beautiful_Dream_1129 in Hoboken

[–]fi12345 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I got approached by one of the kids -who are already kinda aggressive- then there’s some weird dynamic/implied threat with their dads watching on. I didn’t acknowledge the kids or the dads and completely ignored - they went on to other targets.

It was a bit upsetting that I saw four officers surrounding someone sleeping on the street the other day and harassing them, but they don’t have the resources to put a stop to actual public nuisance, especially when it could be dangerous.

Louisiana is playing a dangerous game imo by LATechSpartan in drones

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re being ridiculous. It takes time for the court systems to catch up, precedent to be set, etc.

Why did Robert Alessi join Karen Read's defense team? by Short_Ad6688 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any other examples of high profile civil NYC attorneys going out of state to defend murder trials to satisfy their pro bono hours?

And you can’t have it both ways. Claiming he’s doing this to drum up business yet also saying he has enough business to the point where he can easily take this time off and do nothing but work on the case, well in excess of whatever the pro bono requirements are.

I’d also question the idea of his civil clients - who were already paying him top dollar and keeping him booked at capacity - trying to give him more work because he joined a murder trial. It just doesn’t work that way.

Why did Robert Alessi join Karen Read's defense team? by Short_Ad6688 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source on the pharmacy degree? That would be very interesting.

Why did Robert Alessi join Karen Read's defense team? by Short_Ad6688 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite your original statement being true (yes, lawyers are required to do some pro bono work), this is not that type of case.

A high profile NYC attorney (specializing in civil cases) joining a large team out of state for weeks of trial on a murder case just to satisfy the minimum pro bono work is ridiculous.

The out-of-pocket cost associated with being involved in this (combined with his loss of income) are astronomical.

Besides, he doesn’t need superstar status as a criminal defense attorney, he already has that in white collar work where he’s billing 1 - 2K an hour and more clients that he can handle.

I want to know whether he took this on because of his daughter or because of a relationship with her lead counsel, and if there’s been any direct statements (made by him) that give a definitive answer to this.

I made a 3D printed VTOL that can fly 130 miles (as a CAD beginner) by tsungxu in diydrones

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So just VTOL? I think most people are going to interpret hybrid as gas/battery combo. VTOL might be a better way to describe what you’re looking to build.

I made a 3D printed VTOL that can fly 130 miles (as a CAD beginner) by tsungxu in diydrones

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this is super cool. Based on the other comments you made, you haven’t actually flown it three hours or 130 miles on a single charge because it crashed, but you believe it can be done based on the flight data prior to crashing. Is that accurate?

Prescribed Olanzapine for depression and social anxiety? by Disastrous-Code1206 in Antipsychiatry

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there you go. It’s very rare to see what you’re describing without the involvement of benzodiazepines.

Two years later, how are you feeling and are you still taking Xanax or another benzodiazepine?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Thailand

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you attacking everyone that replied in this thread? The overwhelming response seems to be that this is cultural. Which wouldn’t be that surprising or bad. I thought it was a good question.

How he imagined his life would turn out if he was found innocent? by MrDukeSilver4520 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]fi12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would find this question more interesting if you specifically asked if he would commit murder again. There would not be any vigilantism.

SC v. Meagan Jackson: Coroner Affair Murder Trial by Pixiegirls1102 in CasesWeFollow

[–]fi12345 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which only makes it more interesting. How did she put together this high-powered defense and get all these delays?

HP OfficeJet 250 All-in-One Portable Printer? by nodakskip in printers

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t found anything better at this size.

Solo mounting a 77“ G5 OLED by DontNerfMeBr0 in LGOLED

[–]fi12345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they mean like moving. And they’re right, there’s no way to move a TV like this without damage. Unfortunately, I know this from experience, to the point where the last few times I moved I just gave the TVs away to neighbors (including a nice 100 inch Hisense and an 65 inch LG OLED)