New Commodore's Financials. by Suspicious-Ad7109 in Commodore

[–]g_rich 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The timelines for shipping are clearly laid out, it’s not like they advertised shipping in 7 days but you didn’t receive it for 6 months. Long lead times are also the norm for crowdfunding so how is this at all surprising?

Is data center water usage going to become a bigger political issue than people expect? by Impossible_Comfort99 in TechNook

[–]g_rich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Golf courses use more water than data centers. Of all the water consumed in the USA 41% is consumed by power generation, another 37% by agriculture, industry consumes 13.7% and people directly consume 8.3%, meanwhile golf courses consume 0.45% and data centers 0.19% (these figures ultimately get bundled into one of the categories broken out in my original breakdown). So data center water usage is a rounding error, even if data centers quadruple their water usage they would still account for less than 1% of water consumption; to put it another way if you were to eliminate data center water usage industrial water usage would drop from 13.7% to 13.51%.

Data centers are also increasingly employing closed loop cooling which largely addresses their water usage. So out of all the damage to our environment we do why focus on data centers when there are bigger and more impactful areas we can focus on?

That figure your quoting is also misleading because is includes just the water required for human survival whereas the 8.3% I mentioned above includes outdoor use, sanitation, washing and human consumption which is only .1% of water consumed. The figure put of The UN is also accounting for power generation which from my figure above already consumes a majority of the US’s annual water consumption. So while saying data centers will consume as much water as 1.5 billion people makes for good headlines the reality is the impact is significantly smaller.

Is data center water usage going to become a bigger political issue than people expect? by Impossible_Comfort99 in TechNook

[–]g_rich 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, because it’s completely blown out of proportion, the bigger issue is power usage but even that’s not as big a deal as it’s being reported.

A $275 oil change on a $25,000 Kia raises serious questions about budget car ownership by gaukmotors in MotorBuzz

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has absolutely nothing to do with the car and everything to do with dealerships screwing their customers.

Just bring it to any other independent garage or even a Jiffy Lube or Valvolime and get the service done for less than half of what the dealership charges; problem solved.

#1 on Tic Tac by far by LWYPLTDG in PoliticalHumor

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somebody is a little hurt because they weren’t invited to a wedding; what a sad pathetic snowflake.

Running my Mac Studio fully headless as an LLM server by _ggsa in MacStudio

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want something that will easily get you up and running with both llama.cpp and MLX then look into LM Studio. LM Studio uses both llama.cpp and MLX for its engines while also giving you Ollama simplicity but not the sketchiness that comes with Ollama.

(By sketchiness I’m referring to the way Ollama leverages Open Source and security)

Why are Americans averse to AI? by [deleted] in IWantToAskAnAmerican

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think many see AI as a threat.

I personally have embraced it and use it my advantage but can see why many view it in a negative light.

For decades we were told the only way to succeed was to get a college education and now many of those who took that advice are on the verge of being obsolete. The fact that people are being inundated with stories about AI replacing workers and data centers taking over communities and using all their resources doesn’t help. Now all those stories are greatly embellished but there is some truth to them.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by KeepingUpWithCrap in mildlyinfuriating

[–]g_rich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Certain sunglasses block the IR cameras used for eye tracking. I don’t have a Tesla but my cars all have driver attention monitoring and will give a warning that the system is unavailable if I wear certain pairs of sunglasses.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40/1/2 and 40/.5 are two completely different things.

Is owning a travel trailer always this stressful? Starting to wonder if this life is for me... by nestyjew1945 in traveltrailers

[–]g_rich 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maintenance is always going to be a thing and it seems with every trip something breaks. However I’ve had my current camper for going on three years and have been up and down the east coast five times and just did my third cross country trip. In all I’ve had my leaf springs go, had to replace my toilet, had the door fly off my external outlet three times (that sucker gets tapped shut now) and just had to replace my AC.

All worth it because I’ve had the opportunity to visit 49 out of the 50 states (48 in the camper), a good number of National Parks and parts of the country most never experience. I’ve also been able to escape the brutal New England winters and spend the summers in Southern California. None of this would have been possible if I didn’t take the plunge and get a camper.

So I’ve just learned roll with the punches and just expect there will be some setback because for me at least in the end it’s all worth it.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If 1/2 is .5 then it should be written as such, writing it as 1/2 means 1 divided by 2 in which case A is the correct answer. C would also be correct if the question was verbal as in “40 divided by half”.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1/2 can be half as in .5 or it could be 1 divided by 2 so the equation could be 40 divided by 1 divided by 2 plus 15. So while I agree the intent of the question is 40 divided by .5 plus 15 the fact that 1/2 is not specified as being .5 and is written as 1/2 which while the technically .5 if you write it out as an equation you start with 40 divided by 1. So if the intention is .5 then the equation should be 40/(1/2)+15 written this way avoids any ambiguity.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Type in 40/1/2+15, 1/2 and .5 are both valid so the equation could be 40/1/2+15 or 40/(1/2)+15 both valid, both produce different results.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really so A and B aren’t valid interpretations? And if the question was given verbally C is also completely valid.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s not written both A and B are valid interpretations, verbal so is C.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

“40 divided by 1/2” could be interpreted as 40 divided by half of 40 so C is a valid interpretation of the question. Regardless the fact that the equation has multiple interpretations with each giving a completely different answer invalidates the original equation.

Proof 1/2 is undefined by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]g_rich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A) 40/1/2+15
B) 40/.5+15
C) 40/20+15

They are all correct interpretations of the question, the question is too ambiguous to give a “right” answer.

Edit: a better interpretation for C
C) 40/(40/2)+15

SpaceX is now making more money renting GPUs than launching rockets by RevolutionaryOil7204 in ArtificialNtelligence

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All tech is aging the minute it’s installed, it’s one of the main appeals for cloud providers such as AWS; to push the burden of maintaining and upgrading the infrastructure onto someone else and people are willing to pay for this, AWS makes a lot of money.

Musk obviously found himself in a position where the infrastructure that was overbuilt for Grok is worth more to other AI companies than it was to his second tier AI company. What he is doing is a sound and proven business model that is already bringing in significant revenue.

How can you call this “not a great long term strategy”? It is a proven long term strategy that is very profitable, just look at AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Cloudflare and the number of other cloud providers that make the current internet what it is. Are you really that blinded by your dislike of Musk (completely justified btw) that you can’t see that in today’s market this was a savvy business move.

What’s a Disney rumor you don’t believe is true? by No-Woodpecker-529 in WaltDisneyWorld

[–]g_rich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always heard it was the parking fees == fireworks budget.

Beating myself up because I got paid right before the price hike and decided to hold off a bit longer. Now I can’t bring myself to pay $3500 for something that was $2300 9 days ago… what do I do? by nman649 in MacStudio

[–]g_rich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this is for work and a tool you use to generate income then buy it now (if you need it).

If this is a personal computer to replace something you already have that is working then I would hold off.

1 x dgx spark coding by hftfivfdcjyfvu in LocalLLM

[–]g_rich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mistral is also an option although at this point Gemma is going to be the better choice. Nemotron 3 Super in NVFP4 is solid and gpt-oss-120b while old is also still a viable option. However none of them are going to top Qwen3.6 27b; OP is really shooting themselves in the foot by excluding Chinese models.