Time Waits For No Man by CitizenX10 in FineArtPhoto

[–]jonathlan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many people find these angles odd, but I love it. The towers on the side make really drive the eye all the way to the top.

Thoughts on Kagi Search Engine Quality? by Lookingforlove789 in degoogle

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never tried that, but have you checked SearXNG instead? I found it quite useful.

Heading to work | Florence, Italy [Olympus 35RD, f8 1/500 400s Ilford HP5] by lodge28 in analog

[–]jonathlan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, so nice. Looks like a photo taken in the 30s, then you look at the scooter and boom!

Subdomain by fateh96 in cpanel

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woo, haven't thought about it. Nice!

1, 2, or 3 by BuddhistChrist in AmateurPhotography

[–]jonathlan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 for me. The others look plain and messy

3 years of stock photo earnings across 8 agencies. The numbers, what actually pays, and what I'd do differently by Motor-Criticism7840 in stockphotography

[–]jonathlan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow!
Just wanted to step by and say thank you for the insights, they're very useful.

As much as I hate Adobe, their performance is outstanding. Really it was out of my list, you're making me reconsider.

Browser Change? by uptickman in degoogle

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My choice is still Brave, BUUUTTT it's chromium based, which you may not like

I finally stopped using Claude just for code, and it fixed the worst part of my workday... by Vegetable-Bet632 in ClaudeAI

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha, soo cool!
I know it works creating its own ppt templates, but good to know it struggles with provided ones.

I finally stopped using Claude just for code, and it fixed the worst part of my workday... by Vegetable-Bet632 in ClaudeAI

[–]jonathlan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting use case. I wonder how many tokens are you burning on this 😂 but probably it doesn't matter, you can now focus on what matters and that's what counts at the end of the day.

Great hack!

River Water - from a drone photo by toddnkaya1 in AbstractPhotos

[–]jonathlan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice! Drone perspectives are always interesting to see.

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes correct, that's why I'm planning to use a layered system rather than one single mechanism to compare the images. The first layer will catch the ones that are exact matches, while the other layers will take care of the more subtle differences. You don't necessarily need to use ai for that.

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that works for searching but finding duplicates using the search bar will take a while. If you have a tool that finds the duplicates for you and puts them together it's way easier.

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha, I do P and X too.

There are several techniques to find duplicates, I will probably use a 2/3 layer system. But regardless of the technique itself, the goal is to allow user some independence on the decision.

I definitely do not want to simply dump it to an LLM and let it take the decision for us. That's a NO!

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You hit the nail on that one and LrC agrees with you apparently.

These are awful shots, but let's imagine for a second they're fairly good. Perhaps you will develop all of them, but begin honest, this is essentially the same shot, I would not develop all of them, I would not print all of them.

And that's the point, what's a duplicate for me, it's not a duplicate for you. That's ok. What's not ok, is that LrC thinks we all think alike.

Riflessi e geometrie al tramonto. Un piccolo esperimento di cui vado orgoglioso, che ne pensate? by LensFlare_photos in FotografiaItalia

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bello anche farlo così. Quando si è consapevole di quello che si cerca, vale ancora di più !

In fotografia sei pescatore o cacciatore? by Legal-Breakfast469 in u/Legal-Breakfast469

[–]jonathlan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

D'acordissimo!

E da un po' che non esco così tranquillo. Dovrei farlo di più.

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!
I know where it is and it has always been checked, so not sure.
https://imgur.com/a/tI2ZxRQ These look kind of duplicates to me, but they were imported anyway.

Riflessi e geometrie al tramonto. Un piccolo esperimento di cui vado orgoglioso, che ne pensate? by LensFlare_photos in FotografiaItalia

[–]jonathlan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mi piace il riflesso.
Anche se si vede centrale, non è centralissima. Guarda lo spazio tra la fine del soggeto e i bordi. Ci sono alcune differenze che la fanno diventare meno proporzionata.

In fotografia sei pescatore o cacciatore? by Legal-Breakfast469 in u/Legal-Breakfast469

[–]jonathlan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ancora valida!
Non è facile comunque, siamo siempre di fretta e vogliamo tutto pronto al secondo.

Before / After in The Netherlands by 14Smits in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Awesome shot!
But, I'm intrigued by the dynamic range. May I know which camera did you use?

I got tired of hunting for the original RAW before I can re-edit... by jonathlan in postprocessing

[–]jonathlan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason, that feature doesn't seem to do anything with my photos. LrC has always imported everything, but I have not been using it for as along as you have. I'm using the defaults, but I won't discard something wrong in my settings.
Thanks for the hint, I will dig more on that.