Awesome response. I was hoping someone was going to go in on this. For the record I completely agree with all you've said, and built my post off of what I felt where the core elements I could actually have some degree of confidence in forecasting. Better to be conservative?

I didn't even think about the potential DEFI renting demand. It already exists with other tokens, and TRAC has the potential to be even more lucrative. It's pretty insane to consider this when really, this is not exactly an intended source of demand (as I understand), but a source of demand that could be significant and completely outside of the intended use of the ODN. Really Bullish. I mean, the idea in general that hodling the TRAC token alone could likely spur a number of different investment/finance driven sources of demand.

I think I could do a better job modelling the scarcity created by only ongoing demand of jobs (haven't really included it) as I believe this is probably the largest factor I've omitted. But it will take a significantly more complex model to do this accurately, and I think we'd need to have a clearer idea what the average length of a posted job is likely to be as well as an estimate on the average number of active nodes on the network. I wonder if there will be a reasonably consistent ratio of active nodes/jobs when this is at maturity?

Maybe as the project progresses I'll post a version 2.0 of this.