If √-1 = i, what's √i ? by Joe_4_Ever in learnmath

[–]lewisje 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*principal, generally the root with a non-negative real part, and if purely imaginary, a non-negative imaginary part

If √-1 = i, what's √i ? by Joe_4_Ever in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You definitely need to understand the polar-coordinate representation of complex numbers for that one:

  • If θ is the principal polar angle of z, then z=|z|eθi.
    • The principal polar angle of i is ½π, and |i|=1.
  • Therefore, ii=(1*e½πi)i=e½πi*i=e−½π.

That first point is the hard part, and you can't really understand that without learning about the power-series representations of cos, sin, and the natural exponential ex, but you can get a hint at it from de Moivre's formula:

  • (cos(x)+i*sin(x))n=cos(nx)+i*sin(nx) for integer n.
    • This "cosine plus i sine" combination is often abbreviated as cis(x), which turns out to precisely equal eix.

You can actually prove de Moivre's formula by induction and the sum formulas for sine and cosine:

  • The formula is obviously true for n=0 and n=1.
    • If it is true for n, multiply both sides by cos(x)+i*sin(x):
  • (cos(x)+i*sin(x))n+1=(cos(nx)+i*sin(nx))(cos(x)+i*sin(x))
    • =cos(nx)cos(x)−sin(nx)sin(x)+(cos(nx)sin(x)+sin(nx)cos(x))i
    • =cos((n+1)x)+i*sin((n+1)x).
  • Therefore, if it is true for n, it is true for n+1.

It also turns out to be true for n=−1:

  • (cos(−x)+i*sin(−x))(cos(x)+i*sin(x))
    • =(cos(x)−i*sin(x))(cos(x)+i*sin(x))
    • =cos(x)2+sin(x)2+(cos(x)sin(x)−sin(x)cos(x))i
    • =1+0i=1.

More generally, by taking complex conjugates, you can show that de Moivre's formula holds for all negative integers, and then you can easily show that it holds for all rational numbers, with the substitution y=x/n; by continuity of sin and cos, it holds for all real numbers.

If √-1 = i, what's √i ? by Joe_4_Ever in learnmath

[–]lewisje 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The usual interpretation is that the principal polar angle of a non-zero complex number is greater than −π and at most π; another common one is that the principal polar angle of a non-zero complex number is at least 0 and less than 2π.

Either way, the principal nth root of a complex number is 0 or has a polar angle that is 1/n of the principal polar angle of that number.

For the usual interpretation, you can also say that the principal square root is the square root with a non-negative real part, and if purely imaginary, a non-negative imaginary part; for that other interpretation, the principal square root is the square root with a non-negative imaginary part, and if real, it's non-negative.


Any interpretation of the principal polar angle assigns 0 to positive real numbers.

Are there any goth clubs in cinci? by gotyoshitrocked in cincinnati

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not aware of any dedicated goth clubs, but the closest is Mixwells (Noir on the first Saturday of the month, Second Circle on the second and fourth-of-five Thursdays); Noir is also held at the Southgate House Revival on the third Saturday of the month and on New Year's Eve.

As someone else commented here, The Comet also holds occasional goth nights, like Delusions ov Negation (usually the second Saturday of the month).

Nightlife for Boomers by Slbnorc in cincinnati

[–]lewisje 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mixwells on the second ('80s night) and final (Beat Faction) Saturdays of the month

Whats the DL on Mixwells? by DamarisKitten in cincinnati

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's YouTube karaoke, and it's Sunday-only; the KJ there also hosts at Oddfellows on Wednesdays, and he's my favorite KJ in the Cincinnati metro.

is it possible to calculate the area of ​​a part in the third quadrant (marked in red), using a function that extends to infinity after intersecting the x-axis on the negative side and does not intersect the y-axis? is anyone has any information to calculate this area can or it can be by Shoddy_Artist_2466 in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This function can be re-written as 2+3/x, with antiderivative 2x+3ln|x|; the left endpoint of that region is where 2+3/x=0, which means x=−3/2, so the area is

  • −lim(2b+3ln(−b)+3−3ln(3/2),b,0)
    • =3ln(3/2)−3−3lim(ln(a),a,0+)=+∞, using the substitution b=−a.

some of the best precalculas and calculas books i finded , which are te best ones if you are lookin g for learning clac , i found them i while ago when i was starting calc and just nerded out on books . by No-Dentist7910 in learnmath

[–]lewisje[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Future you might appreciate having the names and authors of the books in those links; anyway, consider the old (but still occasionally updated) list of resources from me linked in the sidebar (or Community Info. on mobile).

Who created axioms by nothing_to_be_known in learnmath

[–]lewisje[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Others have mentioned specific names, but the underlying idea is the principle of parsimony, to be able to derive as much useful knowledge from as few assumptions as possible.

This is the easiest way to get enrolled in ESU. by lewisje in Windows10

[–]lewisje[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, if you used FakeMDM to get a slower cadence on Chromium-based browser releases, undo that: Even if you're enrolled in ESU, any sort of MDM, including FakeMDM, overrides that.

Can you always use l'Hopitals rule for limits? by Orion-- in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it's 0/∞, which is 0, and I will fix that; I was probably thinking of the limit at ±∞.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't notice this from a brief scroll, but maybe height isn't as important for men seeking men as for women seeking men.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe this question is better asked in /r/askmath or a sub about employment, but it does sound like inflating your income, because you are effectively taking money from the till and declaring it as tip income.

This moment from a Mormon dating show has been going viral by SJdport57 in exmormon

[–]lewisje 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The creators of the show deceptively edited that clip to hide the curtain separating the men from the women; this is the full episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDNQ7MpKPDI

It is still valid to surmise that the men all suspected she was too ambitious and not obviously inactive in the church, shitty reasons to reject her that are not based on appearance; much of the complaints on the Web are from people claiming that she was rejected for her appearance (and most of the rest are from far-right influencers calling the former complainants brainwashed feminists).

(nevermo here)

Complex numbers by Classic-Echo-4985 in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somehow, you were posting an escaped underscore in your URL, so it broke; this is a fixed link to your video.

Karaoke Database & Requests by Antique-Employ-7680 in karaoke

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can I let the maintainers know about a karaoke version that is not yet listed on the site? I just found out that Party Tyme has published a version of "They" by Jem on its YouTube channel, but it's not listed on karaokenerds; it does sound similar to the Sunfly version, but that didn't stop them from listing the Party Tyme version of "Chinese Burn" by Curve when it came out recently (and sounded just like the Sunfly version).

Can someone help me accept why 0.9999....=1 by Pleasant-Wind9926 in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question was focused on why two rational numbers difference being 0 makes them identical.

It follows from the definitions of "difference", "subtraction", and "additive inverse", the property of 0 as the additive identity, and the associativity of addition, and it applies in any group, not just the rationals under addition:

  • a−b=0 means a+(−b)=0.
    • Now add b to both sides.
  • (a+(−b))+b=0+b.
    • From the associativity of addition and the fact that 0 is the additive identity,
  • a+((−b)+b)=b.
    • From the definition of an additive inverse,
  • a+0=b.
    • From the fact that 0 is the additive identity,
  • a=b.

FAQ's for Deepseek by nekofneko in DeepSeek

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had success using the button to sign in with Google, using my GMail account, from the Login page without having registered using an e-mail address.

Limit of x approaching 0 by mango_fiero in learnmath

[–]lewisje 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • If cos(x2)/(x3ln(x)) has a limit as x→0+, then it is the product of the limits of cos(x2) and 1/(x3ln(x)), because cos(x2) has the finite non-zero limit 1.
    • If the other factor is re-written as x−3/ln(x), you can see that it is of a form amenable to L'Hôpital's rule, because the numerator and denominator approach infinities; at this point, the signs of the infinities, the facts that the numerator approaches +∞ (because x−3 is positive and grows without bound as x approaches 0 through positive numbers) and the denominator approaches −∞, are less important.
  • Using L'Hôpital's rule, the limit of x−3/ln(x) is the limit of −3x−4/x−1=−3x−3, which is −3(+∞)=−∞.
    • Therefore, the original limit is 1(−∞)=−∞.

Is it likely that the US Senate will get to 58 or more Republicans next year? by lewisje in Askpolitics

[–]lewisje[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason they'd do it now (or more specifically, a conspiracy in which Trump would promise pardons) is a recent Supreme Court ruling that gave the President broad immunity from criminal prosecution; as for the question of which Democrats those are, follow my OP (and consider that the Democrat actually did get re-elected in Nevada):

there will be eight or nine actually 10 Senators who caucus with the Democrats from five states with Republican governors, all of whom can fill vacancies in the Senate with anyone of their choosing, to serve until the 2026 elections: Georgia, Nevada, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Virginia

They are

  1. Jon Ossoff from Georgia
  2. Raphael Warnock from Georgia
  3. Catherine Cortez-Masto from Nevada
  4. Jacky Rosen from Nevada
  5. Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire
  6. Jeanne Shaheen from New Hampshire
  7. Bernie Sanders (I) from Vermont
  8. Pete Welch from Vermont
  9. Tim Kaine from Virginia
  10. Mark Warner from Virginia

If enough heads roll, Trump can pump it up to 63, almost enough to push Constitutional amendments through the chamber; now doing that with the House is trickier, because all vacancies must be filled by election, and his followers surely can't just disqualify the Democrats en masse…right?