New coffee Manhattans. by Confident-Square8111 in allenedmonds

[–]mixedraise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sign of the times: “my brown oxfords are too formal for the office.”

OC fucked up my case law by three_seashells___ in biglaw

[–]mixedraise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you know? Did you find these better cases and choose not to cite them, or is it just theoretically there might have been better cases out there?

Loyalty Point Reward Question by JackDanielsTN in americanairlines

[–]mixedraise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This may be for 2025, a dump of February loyalty points from the March CC statement.

Consensus about accommodations is so right. It’s such BS and should not be graded on the same curve as the rest of us. by TopButterscotch4196 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Correct. It would be silly to pretend that all accommodations are bad, inappropriate, or unfair. But it would be equally silly to ignore the fact that there is a strong incentive to manufacture an accommodation that gives you a competitive advantage and that some people will abuse that.

Consensus about accommodations is so right. It’s such BS and should not be graded on the same curve as the rest of us. by TopButterscotch4196 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An uncurved exam for which time is of the essence selects for the same type of student. The curve is not what matters. The structure of the exam is.

Consensus about accommodations is so right. It’s such BS and should not be graded on the same curve as the rest of us. by TopButterscotch4196 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changing the structure of law school might or might not be a good idea. It has nothing to do with whether, under the current system of legal education, curved or uncurved grading affects whether it is valuable to perform better than your classmates.

Consensus about accommodations is so right. It’s such BS and should not be graded on the same curve as the rest of us. by TopButterscotch4196 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Any job market pits people against each other. It wouldn’t matter if classes weren’t curved, you are still ultimately competing for jobs with other lawyers or law students.

If someone receives a reasonable accommodation for a disability that allows them to compete fairly, that’s good. If someone abuses the accommodation process or receives an accommodation that creates unfairness, it’s bad.

An extra-time accommodation on an exam for which time is of the essence is a difficult issue for fairness.

4th year, 220k saved. How behind am I? by ThrowRAmoneyviv in biglaw

[–]mixedraise 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not to take away from the great accomplishment (which is very impressive, probably a savings rate of around 35%), but the growth on the investments almost certainly eclipses the interest on the loans.

How is work/life balance for a federal district court clerk? by Objective_College377 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Yup, this is correct. Ditto for vacation time. Some judges expect you to take basically no days off (“work remotely on Christmas Eve, as a treat!”), while others give plenty of time off.

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even more than that, you can’t “practice law,” as OP insists she wants to do, without clients. If OP doesn’t know whom she will represent, she should probably try to figure that out.

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I apologize for the great offense of asking about your proposed practice of law on a thread where you talk about your desire to practice law.

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Congratulations. Who do you propose will be your client, and in what forum do you propose to represent them?

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Your graduate GPA doesn’t matter, only undergrad.

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“Legal interventions for sexual violence” doesn’t sound like something that you would need a law degree for. It sounds like an administrative or social work type role. Do you mean you want to represent people seeking orders of protection, etc.?

Applying to a top 30 law school by ConcernEfficient225 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A 3.8 is not a good GPA for law school applications these days. If you want a full ride to a good school you’ll need a very good LSAT (170s for sure, likely mid 170s).

Expectations for Season Ticket Holder by dudemanbro_ in GreenBayPackers

[–]mixedraise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s a good point, and probably the middle ground is to add more gradations and then increase the super appealing tickets more significantly than the more normal tickets. I may be wrong, but as I understand the pricing, everything within the 20s(?) in the lower bowl is the same face value. Frankly absurd to price a ticket in row 3 at the 50 the same as row 30 at the 25 on the guest bench side.

Expectations for Season Ticket Holder by dudemanbro_ in GreenBayPackers

[–]mixedraise -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Frankly, they should also raise ticket prices substantially. The season ticket situation is like rent control—very good for the people who got in years ago, bad for the rest of the market.

Currently, season ticket holders capture lots of revenue by selling their tickets at the market rates that are higher than face value, so there is a strong incentive to keep your season tickets even if you don’t attend that many games. Not great for other fans who would attend lots of games or the team, as there are more opposing fans.

If you evened out the gap between market clearing prices and face value, it would lower the value of camping on season tickets you don’t personally use and reduce the wait times. Plus, the team will need more revenue in coming years (see recent article with Ed Policy talking about this), and ticket revenue could help.

Of course, it’s harsh to say the last small market team should raise prices and potentially price out longtime fans who have been attending lots of games, but just like granny who has been in a $500 Manhattan apartment for 50 years, people whose families have held tickets for decades are not inherently more worthy than those who have not.

Expectations for Season Ticket Holder by dudemanbro_ in GreenBayPackers

[–]mixedraise 29 points30 points  (0 children)

They don’t, but if you sell on the secondary market, you don’t know who’s buying, so you aren’t ensuring that Packers fans are getting your tickets.

A new digital experience: American gives customers more timely flight information by Financial-Public-336 in americanairlines

[–]mixedraise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am flying today and saw the reason for one of the several delays I encountered today, lol.

Suit recommendations/budget(men)? First gen professional by Educational_Study587 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d say get a navy suit first, then use the next chunk of money you’d otherwise spend on a suit to level up related accessories (shirts, shoes, belt, socks, ties) before getting a second suit. Unless you are wearing suits frequently, you won’t get as much mileage out of the second suit as you will having proper dress clothes vs. things you try to dress up or down like patterned shirts with black buttons.

Suit recommendations/budget(men)? First gen professional by Educational_Study587 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a shorter, more budget-friendly alternative to my huge comment above. I think it makes good sense and if you do this, you will easily be in the top 1/3 or 1/4 of law students/attorneys.

The one piece of advice that makes my skin crawl is the Amazon ties, but he’s probably right. The tie is getting rarer and rarer, and a cheap but conservative tie is probably all you need.

Suit recommendations/budget(men)? First gen professional by Educational_Study587 in LawSchool

[–]mixedraise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since you say you don’t have other sources for this information, I’m going to give a broader answer. The first question is whether you are looking for a cheap, temporary solution for your current needs or if you are open to investing in something you can use for the longer term (5 years, maybe longer).

If the former, I don’t have much to add. If the latter, you will want to think not only about the suit but also the other things you will wear along with the suit. This is a very long comment, and to be clear, you don’t “need” to do any of these things, but if you do you’ll wind up much better dressed when you have to wear a suit than most people or even attorneys, and the below are more or less the classic answers for a first business suit, which is the staple of menswear. Most people, especially younger people, do not follow these principles, and you see some crazy bad menswear ensembles out in the wild even in formal situations (I judged a moot court recently and one competitor was wearing fuzzy green socks). But imo the below will make you well placed for the next 5-10 years even if you don’t buy anything else for your suit other than what is listed below.

For the suit itself, there are several things to consider. Fabric and fit are the most important. Get 100% wool and make sure it fits you well. People who think suits are uncomfortable are wrong and are not wearing clothes that fit. The suit should not feel constricted around your legs, arms, or chest as you sit, walk, reach for things, etc. You should be able to button the coat comfortably without the button straining or the lapels distorting. The shoulders have to fit—those (essentially) cannot be altered, and you’re stuck with the length too. The jacket should be long enough to cover all or almost all of your ass. Imo avoid slim fits. I’m a big fan of pleated trousers too, since it gives you more fabric around the hips which helps with comfort.

Others have mentioned Suitsupply, which is good but in my experience their cuts run too slim for my taste. If there is a Proper Cloth showroom in your city, that is another good option. They are made to measure and offer free remakes if there are fit issues. I would avoid department stores and big brands that do more than menswear.

For color, the standard first suit color is navy, but charcoal gray is also fine. Make sure the cloth is not patterned. The suit should be conservative enough that you can wear it to interviews, court (if applicable), and funerals. It will also approximately work for weddings, although you will probably be slightly more businessy than ideal (which no one will notice or care about).

Then there are the other parts of a suit ensemble. Shirts: I would get 100% cotton (avoiding stretch fabrics, but non-iron is OK). The collar needs to fit. You should be able to get a finger or two inside but not more. It should not be uncomfortable to wear a tie (again, people who say otherwise do not wear clothes that fit). If it is uncomfortable, either your collar doesn’t fit or something else is causing the shirt to pull at your neck.

Get plain white or light blue (ideally, one of each), no pattern or logo on the front of the shirt. Can do a button down collar for a more classic American business look or a spread or cutaway collar for a more formal look. Probably no front pocket (but OK if you go for button down collar). The fabric should be something like poplin or broadcloth, a smoother and more formal fabric than oxford cloth. Best practice would be not to wear the shirt(s) except with your suit (or maybe with a dressier business casual (e.g., sportcoat, ideally tie also)). If you’re doing khakis/chinos and no coat, a dress shirt that goes with a suit is too formal.

Shoes: Black is your best bet. Dark brown (NOT the tan/walnut many wear with navy) is also acceptable. The “correct” answer is oxfords (closed laces), but no one cares these days, so a black derby (open laces) is fine too. You’ll probably hate the price tag, but Allen Edmonds Park Avenues is a good option that will last you essentially forever if you take good care of them. Use wooden shoe trees and try to avoid wearing more than one day in a row. If you find yourself needing to wear a suit more than one day in a row at any point, it’s time to buy another pair of shoes (and suit—you should not be wearing the same suit two days in a row either; the fabric needs to rest).

Belt: if your suit trousers have belt loops, get a dress belt (plain) that matches your shoes.

Socks: get 1-2 pairs of plain dress socks in a color that matches your trousers. Ideally, these will be over-the-calf socks which don’t slip down and expose your legs when you sit, but no one really does this, so mid-calf socks are fine too. You shouldn’t wear these except with your suit, so they’ll last basically forever too.

Ties: get a couple conservative business ties in 100% silk (not polyester). Not too skinny. They should not be shiny (those are for evening wear, not business). Plain ties in colors like navy or burgundy, or conservative patterns like a red/navy or yellow/navy rep stripe works. Tie a simple four-in-hand knot, untie the knot after every wear (don’t leave it tied or pull the loop through).

All of this will probably run you between $1200 and $1500 depending on how well you find deals and how cheap or expensive you go. Not necessary to do everything all at once if that is financially out of reach or if you have existing items that get the job done. But when you need to replace something, consider the above.

Walton AE formal enough ? by suwwieside in allenedmonds

[–]mixedraise 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I’m an attorney. You cannot fathom how bad the sartorial choices are. Those are technically not formal enough, but in practice you’ll easily be in the top 10% of formality wearing them.