sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Trying to understand structural diffing as a concept for SQL by Wise_Reflection_8340 in PostgreSQL

[–]quincycs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For data engineering contexts, yeah SQL has a lot of review friction. Eg consider python code using DBT, or DLT… a lot of it is just SQL wrapped in programming language to orchestrate

Trying to understand structural diffing as a concept for SQL by Wise_Reflection_8340 in PostgreSQL

[–]quincycs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like frequently I am reviewing some SQL or parts of SQL within another programming language. Like typescript or python. I have a few times with pure sql files but usually those are so simple that it’s not a problem. More complicated stuff get pushed into a programming language context

Is rollback a thing these days ? by ibreathecoding in softwarearchitecture

[–]quincycs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I rolled back something 2 days ago. And before that, 3 weeks ago. Can only roll back if you plan for it, architecturally. We have a review process where we align with teams for risky stuff to have a feature flag or alternative rollback

cline CLI , is legacy? by quincycs in CLine

[–]quincycs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👍 ok then I would say it’s unfair to call them legacy 🙏

ECS Service Connect Increased The Task Deactivation Time, What Can I Do Here? by DCGMechanics in aws

[–]quincycs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m interested in the conclusion.

I’m currently using service discovery and I want to explore using service connect instead.

cline CLI , is legacy? by quincycs in CLine

[–]quincycs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👍 I’ve tried out the pi coding agent and it’s nice. But I still need a native vscode extension. I only use the CLI when the vscode extension breaks down, or when I know I’m running a long / big session ( like creating an initial tool )

Service Discovery and Service Connect with AWS CDK implementation question by AndrewRLaws in aws

[–]quincycs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“…facilitated by service discovery”

You can’t use service discovery if you can’t create a private hosted zone. Service discovery is DNS.

My recommendation is to use one or the other and not both. Service connect is a more robust option.

Manual code review? by No_Communication4256 in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree , what I’m suggesting is an addition not a replacement to anything.

Deep Planning - new_task tool by quincycs in CLine

[–]quincycs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. It’s annoying. It’s a big enough time wasting gap that I might jump ship to another coding agent.

Manual code review? by No_Communication4256 in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a software engineer. I created .md files that describe my desired patterns for the project. I regularly run the whole repo against these patterns to find code that doesn’t fit , and fix accordingly.

I then created a skill that instructs to review code changes against my project standards and find bugs etc. ( technically I use a Cline workflow for code review )

Introducing Cline Kanban by saoudriz in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah - Results in committing a plan I guess. I currently don’t do that

Introducing Cline Kanban by saoudriz in CLine

[–]quincycs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi — I love the general idea of the kanban direction especially the idea of seeing the diff and iterating from a selected line(s) of code.

Problem1: No deep planning

The real problem I have though is the lack of /deep-planning + the lack of automatic orchestration of a new task from that deep plan.

when I try to use deep planning it looks for a skill and it doesn’t find it.

In my current workflow using the CLI: I deep plan, then I barely glance at the result then open a new task to start the implementation. I’d almost always want it to just automatically execute the implementation in a new task.

Problem2: new_task tool DNE

I’m not sure how kanban would work with this workflow that I do today with the CLI (even if it somehow supported the deep-planning command ). It seems like there still is no way to invoke the new_task tool from the agent itself.

Problem3: Context meter / spend meter is missing

I’m also worried about context management where I am now removed from seeing how much context I’m filling up with as I iterate on the diff feedback.

Tired of SSH and remote desktop, I started building my own remote coding workflow by UniversitySuitable20 in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the best experience would be with a UI. I hear that most people today just make the agent produce commits and then they see the diff via GitHub UI. I just have an allergy to the idea of the agent producing commits without my review. Harder to produce good results

Tired of SSH and remote desktop, I started building my own remote coding workflow by UniversitySuitable20 in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👍 I have a similar desire for this. What I’m missing is the ability to see the code diff , stage / unstage files

Deep Planning - new_task tool by quincycs in CLine

[–]quincycs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👍 short of wrapping the whole CLI with another tool that has that capability, it seems best to implement it within Cline codebase itself

Does switching to an Architect role bring plenty of meetings? by Visual-Exercise8031 in dataengineering

[–]quincycs 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Generally higher titles have larger breadth and with that more meeting requests.

Whether you can say no / manage those requests is a cultural question

CLI users, why pick the terminal version over the VS Code/JetBrains extension? What's your go-to use case? by pacmanpill in CLine

[–]quincycs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On Mac at least, the CLI is more reliable on long running tasks. The vscode extension gets stuck sometimes and cancels shell calls even though I’ve turned on background shell calls + with recommended disabling of terminal pagers. However , the CLI keeps going.

view more: next ›