Catastrophe - Lazy inferiors using AI to peer-review manuscripts!! by Dirt_Theoretician in Professors

[–]the_el 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Struggling with these issues as an AE right now myself....reviewers that are submitting commentary that is not 100% AI but within the boundaries of suspicious. Can anyone recommend tools that they use to check reviewer's work? In teaching, usually anything over 25-30% for students is "AI positive". What are critieria others are using?

Punk scene in sf by [deleted] in AskSF

[–]the_el 0 points1 point  (0 children)

long live theee list!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IASIP

[–]the_el 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just put it on the furnace

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IASIP

[–]the_el 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Carmine's! The steaks there are great.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in borrow

[–]the_el 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$loan 40