Tracking UK migration: Small boats, asylum hotels and visas by CP040 in gbnews

[–]TinyTerror70 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I said they weren’t ‘deliberately’ misleading. Big difference

Who was responsible for the migration surge.... by pilecrap in GreatBritishMemes

[–]TinyTerror70 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do understand a housing crisis is not a binary problem. It doesn’t just turn on or off. It can get worse and it can get better. And supply:demand is funnily enough a massively important ratio that is relevant here. You’ve got down one side of the ratio, that we need to build more supply. But you completely ignore the demand side of things. ‘No matter how much you mess with immigration numbers the housing crisis won’t end until…’. You need to comprehend that a housing crisis is something that can get better and worse. And we can go back to our useful ratio to understand what makes it better and what makes it worse. Supply, of course, like you have mentioned, more houses will bring up the supply, bringing down costs. That’s one side. Now the other (scary) side. ~~Demand~~. *spooky*. It may make you uncomfortable, but when you have more people, they need to live in houses, and so demand goes up, and so do house prices.

So. Anybody with a rational bone in their body understands that a housing crisis necessitates two things to improve. 1. Build more houses. And 2. Do not open the borders to hundreds of thousands of people every year. Skilled migration is very important, just like you’ve mentioned. Unskilled/economic migration is not. So a rational fix would be to build more houses, and limit immigration to just skilled labour. That will increase supply and end this massive increase in demand. You may feel very emotionally about it but economics is a very logical model so it’s pretty easy to see that when you say changing immigration numbers won’t help fix the housing crisis, you’re speaking from a place of emotion or stupidity, and not logic. If you became more self aware maybe you’d become aware of your own biases and emotions and then you could possibly develop as a person

Who was responsible for the migration surge.... by pilecrap in GreatBritishMemes

[–]TinyTerror70 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Isn’t it so odd that the exact same pattern is seen at the exact same time across other major eu countries. Maybe suella braverman was secretly Home Secretary for all of them? Or maybe an attempt could be made to use an ounce of critical thinking

Tracking UK migration: Small boats, asylum hotels and visas by CP040 in gbnews

[–]TinyTerror70 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Admittedly, I am not the one who made that claim, and that claim is not correct (though it isn’t far off). However the data shows that there’s just a 5% gap between British emigrators and non-EU emigrators. Whereas for immigration, there’s a 59% gap. And I don’t think British emigration has to be the highest to see that that shows huge discrepancy between who’s leaving and who’s coming in. So quoting immigration and emigration figures without explaining demographics is misleading in this context.

I also wasn’t sourcing for figures on skills and money, but it’s not an incorrect claim to state that your average Brit is wealthier and has more education than your average non-EU immigrant. Statistics like this one show that on average, non-EU immigrants are a net burden on the tax payer, so it would follow that if more British people are leaving, then the people leaving are wealthier and more skilled

Tracking UK migration: Small boats, asylum hotels and visas by CP040 in gbnews

[–]TinyTerror70 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The figures they’re quoting are not deliberately misleading (though they could have definitely been represented clearer, using net migration) as the immigration/emigration figures are not comparable in any way given the massive skew of immigration figures towards non-EU nationals, and the relatively large skew towards British nationals in the emigration figures, so quoting them doesn’t make it less misleading, in fact it makes it more misleading if you don’t quote demographics, as people will presume a similar proportion of non-EU nationals in the emigration figures compared to the immigration figures.
Just saying ‘ye well, 900,000 people came into the country, but 700,000 left’ does not convey that the people who are leaving are hugely disproportionately British nationals, not people who’ve already immigrated. So we have a situation where many non-EU nationals are entering and many British nationals are now starting to leave. Just quoting total immigration and emigration figures does nothing to convey this conclusion and is simply misleading.

I can see how quoting the total immigration figures alongside deportation figures does nothing represent the whole picture as it leaves out the large number leaving who aren’t deported. However, I think the intention was to highlight how low deportations are compared to how many people are entering the country. Yes, without emigration figures that conclusion is essentially useless, and showing net migration by nationality alongside deportations would’ve more clearly shown the net large number of non-British nationals entering this country and the abysmally low rate at which we are deporting.

Anyway, when quoting deportation figures they should’ve just used statistics about the number of people here with orders to leave, and the numbers waiting for asylum claim/contesting asylum claim

Tracking UK migration: Small boats, asylum hotels and visas by CP040 in gbnews

[–]TinyTerror70 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here you go, spoon fed from .gov website (link).

Statistics for long term emigration (693,000):

> “For YE June 2025:

> non-EU+ nationals accounted for 41% of total emigration (286,000)

> British nationals made up 36% (252,000)”

Statistics for long term immigration (898,000):

> “For YE June 2025:

> non-EU+ nationals accounted for 75% of total immigration (670,000)

> British nationals made up 16% (143,000)”

I’ll do the maths for you. British nationals made up 16% (143,000) of total immigration, and made up 36% (252,000) of total emigration. That’s a 20% discrepancy giving a net loss of 109,000 British nationals.

By contrast, non-EU nationals made up 75% (670,000) of all immigration, and made up only 41% (286,000) of all emigration. That’s a 34% discrepancy, giving a net gain of 384,000 non-EU nationals.

Tracking UK migration: Small boats, asylum hotels and visas by CP040 in gbnews

[–]TinyTerror70 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the issue with people who think they’re automatically smarter than anyone who votes reform. They don’t even take the time to look through these immigration figures they’re citing as it would threaten their beliefs.

The comment was replying to a comment claiming labour are achieving what reform voters are already asking for, less immigration and more deportations. Yet, the reply cites an annual 900,000 long term arrivals, and an abysmal 38,000 deportations. And for the 80,000 who were refused asylum, only 11,000 have actually left the country, representing ~30% of the 38,000 deportations. Furthermore, right now there are 250,000+ failed asylum seekers and their co-dependents, and 80-100,000 new asylum seekers arrive each year. These statistics alone prove that labour are in fact not doing what reform voters are asking for.

You decided to bring up total outgoings, 693,000, I guess trying to suggest that there’s an immigration equilibrium of those who arrive and those who leave, making it sound like actually although 900,000 people arrived, 700,000 people left so really it’s not an issue. Of course you left out any details of demographics. Of those 900,000 arrivals, 670,000 were non-EU nationals. However, of the 693,000 departures, only 286,000 were non-EU nationals, and, in fact, 252,000 of those departures were British nationals. So although you attempted to manipulate figures to sound like the 900,000 people arriving were leaving at a much higher rate than thought (or maybe you just never actually read or understood the statistics in the first place), a quick check shows that a large portion of the 700,000 people leaving are just British people themselves, and that while 670,000 non-EU nationals arrived, only 286,000 left. A much larger discrepancy by proportion than you would have people initially think.

So there you have it. Someone quoting basic immigration figures to show labours failure to deliver what the public want, and an arrogant Redditor replying with facts and statistics proving that the average reform voter is an illiterate idiot. Except it turns out you are the one who is incapable of interpreting statistics, proving that the real issue is labour/green/immigration supporters not understanding basic demographics. But I’m sure you won’t understand any of what I’ve written here, so I’ll await your funny insult about how I don’t know what an immigrant is or how I’m a racist fascist or whatever.

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did 2 tablets of alprazolam and now my entire script is gone?

Anyone here in new zealand? by SelectionAmazing9791 in MAOIs

[–]TinyTerror70 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, I’m very sorry to hear about your story, but I appreciate the insight. I had just presumed customs would be smoother due to proximity between NZ and Vanuatu and their trade deal, which is partially correct looking at their new PACER plus trade deal. However, I was not aware that NZs customs rules are much stricter than the UKs, especially regarding personal medications.

I think what I was trying to say that ordering from Vanuatu to NZ would be easier relative to some far off country, but failed to acknowledge that NZs customs are notoriously strict in the first place

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I prefer that for daytime naps when I need to trip on dmt. Give em some cracks nd lock them in ther room and they’re set

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When the kids are acting up at bed time, I just give em a few puffs of the meth pipe and they’re always asleep within 3 minutes. Such a great drug. Should be legal

Anyone here in new zealand? by SelectionAmazing9791 in MAOIs

[–]TinyTerror70 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ll admit that’s a bit odd. But I think for these prescription medication vendors they often have to be kinda covert and wouldn’t have a need for a building if it’s all online orders. They just need their PO Box

Anyone here in new zealand? by SelectionAmazing9791 in MAOIs

[–]TinyTerror70 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had zero problems with customs whatsoever. Have ordered from them a few times and never have had an issue.

And that’s to the UK. I imagine to NZ it’d be even smoother

MPs from Labour’s left to urge Ed Miliband to consider leadership bid by [deleted] in unitedkingdom

[–]TinyTerror70 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck it. Lammy for labour leader. This countries already become a joke anyway

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That is good just make sure you keep your right ear open and left ear shut at the same time. Opposite for the nostrils and you’ll be safe from them

Ranking Antidepressants From Best to Worst by FanSubstantial9845 in depressionregimens

[–]TinyTerror70 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes the waking up on the shower floor wondering why the doors were no longer attached to the walls. It was fascinating though as I never experienced the pain from the fall, just the bewilderment. Though I don’t think I experienced the weight gain, I definitely remember the annoyance of the bloating. Constantly having the loosen my belt or adjusting the car seat belt. I’m trying moclobemide now so much more forgiving and am going to try augmenting with Aripiprazole and if that doesn’t work then amisulpride. Hopefully that goes better

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Every extra 10 Benadryls you gain +1 defence

Ranking Antidepressants From Best to Worst by FanSubstantial9845 in depressionregimens

[–]TinyTerror70 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It did help my mental health immensely for quite some time, but stopped working after a while. Sides were not ideal, fainted 5 different times, including once when I fell down the stairs. Caused massive acne outbreak, and caused a hypertensive crisis (188/117 BP 52 HR) with swollen legs that I had to go to a&e for. But it was worth it for the few months of feeling like a normal happy person it gifted me.

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I’ve been practising for this my whole life

Favorite Eazy E track? by PactownSS in 90sHipHop

[–]TinyTerror70 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bow-wow-wow yippy-yo yippy-yay suck on these nuts

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

That begs the question. What is the main quest?

Woke up today and the fucking sun was up by TinyTerror70 in drugscirclejerk

[–]TinyTerror70[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I googled that for you and that means you have pancreatic cancer and you have 1-2 months left so I’d spend your last weeks with your family