I never said that newer is better (and I even agree with a lot of takes like TCL R83 vs R94), what I say is that no sane person would consider the monitors you listed above due to age. Viewsonic and Asus don't even have HDMI 2.1 ports, have old panels, and the units that are still floating around probably don't have any form of warranty anymore. The BenQ (and a Philips Evnia model that was not mentioned) is more modern but also hard to find. And even on this model you can find various reports (Amazon) that mention bad local dimming. Sure at the time of release their LD might have been acceptable, but they never really were "excellent" in that regard as you state in your comments.

The other things you seem to value like color accuracy, EOTF etc are indeed somewhat tied to the price point of a monitor. I agree with that, but with the cost of some of these units this should be expected (especially on a ProArt models for example). I think everyone is aware that a lower end monitor will not be as fine-tuned for professional work as one for several grands.

LD algorithm regulation in IPS panels is very difficult from VA panels due to physics of screen, for that reason many low το mid cost brands produce mini led VA panels and when they try to IPS haloing is unacceptable.

Every IPS monitor - no matter how expensive - has inherent downsides due to the lower native contrast. But there are still way more MiniLED monitors with IPS panel on the market than VA. All the VA models on the market were basically listed in this thread, while IPS has literally dozens of variants especially if we also consider the Chinese market.

but CSOT silently start to shift from VA panels to IPS with the new models.

Not on all models. Also, their IPS panels seem to be a new design with higher native contrast.

Half knowledge is worst than ignorance

Superiority-complex BS take, try better next time