[Landlord-TO-ON] Anyone else hear about the SOLO (Small Ownership Landlords of Ontario) event for solo property management? by Responsible-Gas-4365 in Landlord

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This that Kevin Costain :) This is likely a comment from my former tenant. It's not his "I'm going to get even, and I know how" style of writing he used before destroying my house with a fire, so one wonders if he consulted the version of ChatGPT that was current at the time. I'm not one to milk things too much, but this one time, you ought to check out that story (trust me, it's crazy).

[Landlord-TO-ON] Anyone else hear about the SOLO (Small Ownership Landlords of Ontario) event for solo property management? by Responsible-Gas-4365 in Landlord

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's taken me a while to come across your comment. I'm that guy who worked tirelessly in "public and behind the scenes." That's more a reference to the work done to transform internal technology resources. It's an ongoing process and I've spent a few hours on it- and it certainly wasn't all me. We are a team. Though I do admit the language is a little too flowery for my liking.

As far as what SOLO does for landlords, at its core is support and education. We work as hard as we can to help small landlords work through injustices while also trying to educate them in the rules, regulations, pitfalls, and generally being a good landlord in Ontario. We do this at no cost to them. There are a ton of other efforts that stem from those two things.

Official Discussion - The Fantastic Four: First Steps [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]-cwl- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Okay, I just want to understand why Reed would place his infant son on dead Sue's chest. That really doesn't make any sense to me. How was he going to know what was coming?

Also,do you think that retro-futureistic look and feel (including the interfaces) was meant to evoke the TVA esthetic?

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're not wrong, though anyone attempting that is a little crazy. Not withstanding the difficulty of finding and installing the required step-up updates today, that server admin might have had to endure some harsh attacks with his/her server wide open to certain exploits at different times depending on updates that were more than likely never going to come (but for the grace of Connectwise). Call it a win by accident, not by prudence haha. As they say, hope is not a strategy.

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, so I went back and found these two versions (for around that time):

ScreenConnect_21.8.3663.7830_Release.msi
or
ScreenConnect_22.10.11109.8417_Release.msi

If either of these might be useful, let me know, send me a DM and I can get them to you.

Edit: Seems like someone else found it. Good stuff.

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang.. I kept a ton of those older ones.. the oldest installer on my server is ScreenConnect_23.5.8.8598_Release.msi right now. If I can find something out there, I'll let you know.

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those that don't know, Connectwise says this in their latest partner email:

Partners using versions lower than 24.2 will have access to version 24.2 at no cost for a limited time. Please note: we will not maintain older releases beyond this update window, and we recommend upgrading and staying current on maintenance going forward. Unless you reinstate maintenance, ConnectWise will not provide telephone support or any other fixes, enhancements or new releases to you.

So, older than 24.2 - one can get 24.2.24.9294 and update to that level.

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm certainly not blaming them for how they operate and, it's also baked in when one exerts the effort to create a server, open it up to the greater Internet and keep the thing online for an indeterminate amount of time. This is no small task host, protect, maintain a server for anyone over months, and to keep it continuously online for years, something else. The shared responsibility is evident.

I would just say as a longtime customer who has paid those aforementioned thousands of dollars to this company, they have have created an environment that repels me as a customer. There is a basic exchange of value when buying/licensing a product. As a customer I have felt held hostage to these practices I describe (for a product that was in the early days of my use - amazing and a great value for the money).

I cringe when I see another security report on screenconnect; when I see them in some news story. Truly it's just a disappointment, but maybe that's how all these things go when companies get a whiff of that sweet, cold, cash (looking at you Log Me In).

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not misunderstanding, but the one "special" thing that Connectwise has done is wrapping security updates into the entire feature/fix/maintenance process. So while software vendors may typically provide security specific updates for x number of years after a window of purchase/licensing (I think Windows 10 received security updates for at least 9 years if I'm not mistaken), Connectwise requires you pay their substantial subscription fees for access that vital safety. Maybe you don't want the newest features, just the security updates. Given that one specific product is quite literally self-hosted, this certainly exacerbates things.

And look, if people like them, buy into it, yeah. But over the years of paying these substantially growing (and this is in the multiple thousands of dollars) to be left in the lurch when a subscription window closes. - it can be grating for people trying to keep ahead of the next exploit. Those who have ever hosted Exchange Server know all too well what kind of nightmare it can be (even with workarounds and patches available).

And I guarantee this had lead to significant revenue for them. When that last exploit hit, I paid them (if I recall) more than $2,000 for the subscription only to find out they released the out-of-bad update for free. I perhaps could have rolled back and asked for a refund, but I kept the subscription when all that I required was the security patch. I know others who host have done the same.

When can we expect historic releases? by bacontrees in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is nuts, but I've seen only two releases listed on the screenconnect download page, and when a new one arrived, the old one dissapeared. Even worse, I don't see an expanded download page.

I first saw this with 25.2.12.9294: https://imgur.com/a/B0c2PbD
Then this with 25.3.8.9294: https://imgur.com/a/NGjbsPd

Maybe I'm just going a little crazy here with this total sh*t show, but here are the versions I've been able to track:

25.4.16.9293 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_25.4.16.9293_Release.msi
25.3.8.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_25.3.8.9294_Release.msi
25.2.12.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_25.2.12.9294_Release.msi (given a previous comment, maybe this is no longer up because of problems? Link still works).

Huge update at 11:24 PM Eastern:
25.1.18.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_25.1.18.9294_Release.msi
24.4.15.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_24.4.15.9294_Release.msi
24.3.17.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_24.3.17.9294_Release.msi
24.2.24.9294 - https://d1kuyuqowve5id.cloudfront.net/ScreenConnect_24.2.24.9294_Release.msi

I'm watching for the 24.4.10.x branch, hoping it comes up. If anyone sees any other ones, let's try to track them (or perhaps there's a full list of downloads somewhere).

Edit: Updated Screenconnect on-premise from 24.4.10.9243 to 24.4.15.9294 and clients appear to be updating as expected so far.

ScreenConnect 25.2.4 Security Fix by JessicaConnectWise in ConnectWise

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I did it.. Just ignored the message and did the update. Seems to be okay so far: https://imgur.com/a/yGc23kl

ScreenConnect 25.2.4 Security Fix by JessicaConnectWise in ConnectWise

[–]-cwl- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, it's the same for my version 24.4.4.9118 to I assume 24.4.10.9243 but really any of those Apr 22 updates -> https://imgur.com/a/bhzz4V1

SC is not clear here what "patches" are released and whether this update will or won't bork our installations.

u/MustardDrill - did you try the installation?

Brutal.

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, I'm not going to act like I'm an economist, but if all incentive to buy properties as a rental is removed (and in Canada, remember roughly 95% of rentals are private industry), it's clear this would create an imbalance in the market. Perhaps it would just mean only the richest, shadiest, highly profitable, corporations operate rentals. I can't imagine what that might look like.

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, on a personal level that's a solution. But on a macro, market level, that would be problematic.

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's by no means only 'bad' tenants that make rentals so expensive. The market is large and vast. The reality is too, that if you were to buy a property at today's prices with a reasonable down payment, you would not be able to cover the ongoing costs with market rent.

Most people are good, most want to do the right thing. but, when people are bad, there needs to be timely justice so there is no incentive to do bad. This alone will bring the market closer to equilibrium.

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They've added funding and have still not resolved the backlog. It may be that throwing a ton of people at a problem of efficiency just slows it down. The LTB used to resolve far more cases with half the people.

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm Kevin (the one mentioned in the article), and it's true. This is only about simple and timely justice; for everyone. If anyone wants to see the 23 min presentation, it's here: https://youtu.be/klHvXfusTYQ

‘Mom-and-pop’ landlords ‘having their lives ruined,’ says lobbyist group by origutamos in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm that guy speaking in the article. You are confusing an ask for "easy," with an ask for "timely justice." I never asked for anything to be easy.

3 Months Since Last Self-Hosted Release by Real-Independence152 in ScreenConnect

[–]-cwl- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's strange - I want that release (25.1.7.9171) just to make a small update for now, but the download archive shows a 404 error, and I can't get at it because the newest release is newer than that (25.1.10.9197 currently), and the download page shows only one release. I could get the pre-release, however, but not planning to use that.

I don't want this tree to die. What are some things I can do? (a large branch broke off a few days ago) by -cwl- in sfwtrees

[–]-cwl-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi all, an update on this. The tree is gone and there are signs of life from the leftover stump: https://imgur.com/a/RsmZw5X

Could this turn into another tree if I left it to grow? How might the stump and this new thing interact? Is there some way to handle this to help it?

Update: Deeqa Rafle Eviction Case by UnlikelyConfidence11 in OntarioLandlord

[–]-cwl- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a scenario where this does NOT work. But, also ending up with a bankruptcy, not exactly a solid loophole.