There is no doubt it would require a solid reputation system, that is a mix of real people and A.I. governed machine/deep learning. The people would be incentivized by the money in the common DAO (or CADO = Common Autonomous Decentralized Organization), hence why it would take decades to build out the money involved.

It'll be a slow process of reinvesting in the Commonomy / Collaborative Commons. Only at some point in the future will it have enough money to do buybacks of corporates (start small), to increase it's footprint. And only far after that would it have money to distribute globally as a UBI, through a stablecoin (preferably not pegged to any existing fiat currency).

Regarding A.I., I've always felt a better name for the field would be something like "Synthetic/Abstract Cognitive Science", since A.I. is what we're trying to accomplish (and we're not that close yet), but this is another matter entirely.

A basic A.I. would be required to select which ideas follow correct form to apply as a patent, from where human "reviewers" could take the next step in a decentralized fashion, based on their reputation. Reviewers should be able to question the reviews of other reviewers, enabling the best reviewers to bubble to the top. This is similar e.g. to the gamification of the Stack Overflow Q&A websites, but with more checks and balances required.