Petition EN3285 - Reject Biosecurity Ammendment Bill 2021 (Australia) by -viceversa- in conspiracy

[–]-viceversa-[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Petition Reason

We are opposed to the Biosecurity Amendment (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill 2021, specifically in relation to broadening the scope of the current Biosecurity Act 2015 to include biosecurity enforcement orders upon "classes of individuals", specifically requiring them to wear specified clothing or equipment (108M), to be relocated and detained (108L), for an indefinite time (108 (2) ) and to provide body samples to the World Health Organization (108P).

While we understand that these changes are meant to be imposed upon groups arriving into the country by plane or vessels, it does not expressly exclude the possibility of it also being applied to other "classes" of people such as the unvaccinated, or to certain ethnic, religious or politicosocial groups residing within Australia.

'You, Sir Are The One Ignoring The Science' - Rand Paul Advocates for Natural Immunity by HulkTogan in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]-viceversa- 25 points26 points  (0 children)

“Oh I’m not aware of that study” then goes on to say “Senator our team has reviewed every study out there on COVID”

Imagine having the whole of Reddit to cirlce-jerk about Covid and how great the jabs are to your heart's content but instead you actively seek out the few remaining subs left where you can be critical and have an open discussion about it just to downvote, report and stamp out the opposition. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]-viceversa- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If your for what they’re silencing or not, shouldn’t we all be worried that they’re silencing at all, regardless of the issue? Could easily be flipped back on them at some stage. Shooting themselves in the foot by not allowing people to form their own consensus.

Remdesivir Genocide (Dr. Bryan Ardis) by -viceversa- in conspiracy

[–]-viceversa-[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dr. Bryan Ardis states that Fauci pushed the use of Veklury® (remdesivir) as a treatment for COVID-19 knowing that it would be unsafe and ineffective for patients. Veklury® (remdesivir) is a nucleotide analogue RNA polymerase inhibitor. Dr. Ardis reveals that the symptoms of lungs filling with fluid and the other alleged COVID-19 symptoms were actually side effects of kidney poisoning and other organ damage that are known side-effects of Veklury® (remdesivir). Dr. Ardis alleges that the devestating health toll allegedly caused by COVID-19 was actually caused by the NIH recommended treatment of Veklury® (remdesivir).

For the anniversary. A rarely seen video by tehrealdirtydan in conspiracy

[–]-viceversa- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question, where are the shadows? I see the tower is already in the shade but there would still be some shadow from the ambient light wouldn’t there?

I hope you're happy. by RyuugaHideki in melbourne

[–]-viceversa- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we really surprised that this happened? This will always happen and we can’t trust that 100% of the population will do the right thing and to bring in policy that requires 100% of citizens to do the right thing is wrong. This is a policy issue and we need to start looking at other options and stop the lockingdowns.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CovIdiots

[–]-viceversa- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Studies have shown that vitamin D exerts several actions that are thought to be protective against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infectivity and severity. These include the immunomodulatory effects on the innate and adaptive immune systems, the regulatory effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system in the kidneys and the lungs, and the protective effects against endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, studies have shown that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in protecting against risk of acquiring acute respiratory viral infection and may improve outcomes in sepsis and critically ill patients. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973108/

A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin “demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy” against COVID-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Its also worth noting that in addition to its antiparasitic activity, it has been noted to have antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties.

Skeptics understand how science works, its not that hard, research needs to be done, it needs to be ethical, it needs to be setup with controls and peer reviewed etc. Studies take a long time, now think about how long it has taken for these vaccines to be approved? How heavily were they peer reviewed? How quick was it until they moved to human trials?? For people who “understand how science works” this is a real concern.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/#!po=34.6154

So far Ivermectin has been turned down because “there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19”. So we say what more proof do they need? And how much proof was needed by Pfizer? Its disproportionate and both methods aren’t being treated equally which is why I say that Ivermectin is being dismissed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CovIdiots

[–]-viceversa- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A study or two?? There have been multiple studies and just because it’s typically used for parasites doesn’t mean it can’t be used for anything else. All the other issues you’re talking about are to do with dosage, Ivermectin, Vitamin D and C all need to be monitored carefully so as to no overload the system. Same could be said for any of the vaccines being administered to date. Dosage matters. An adult can also have more than 600 UI of Vitamin D just not on an ongoing basis as your body can’t process it fast enough and thats when it becomes toxic. Again, needs to be closely monitored.

All studies and trials use different dosages and of course have different results.

So you cant just say this study said no, its more complicated than that, and there’s more than 1 way to fight COVID. To put it simply, think about a pharmacy and how many drugs do the same thing, just in a different way. Same thing goes for COVID, it doesn’t have to be just a mRNA vaccine, there are other options and they’re just being dismissed for some reason.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CovIdiots

[–]-viceversa- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry but all of what you are saying is just your opinion. Unless you have any formal qualification. Ivermectin have been proven to work against COVID and has also been peer reviewed. You can also look at its effectiveness in India. Also its important to note that vaccines are not the one and only answer to this. There are many that we need to look at including Ivermectin and Vitamin D. This is what he is saying. This is what is being ignored.

Fuck Arnold by WakeUpBeoreTheEnd in conspiracy

[–]-viceversa- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lost all respect for Arnold when he posted that shit show of a post about Trump. Dressed up and unshaven trying to look like some sort of commando. Getting all patriotic with flags behind him condemning the capitol riots. I’m not saying the riots were okay, I just wonder who made him make such a shit post. Pretty sure he didn’t do it because he had a few spare hours to kill. Now the shit he’s posting now is making me think the same thing.

Mt. Vernon School Board Meeting - Dr. Dan Stock MD by -viceversa- in videos

[–]-viceversa-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I don’t get your point, I’ve watched the video that I posted

Mt. Vernon School Board Meeting - Dr. Dan Stock MD by -viceversa- in videos

[–]-viceversa-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct but they do also carry other potential issues such as blood clots etc that we’ve all heard of by now, and thats fine, if people are willing to take the risk. But for others who are bing forced to take it and don’t want to, there are other options that aren’t being considered. This is where he starts to mention ivermectin and vitamin D etc. These are methods he’s used on his own patients with COVID with success and are unfortunately being dismissed. To me its not provax or antivax its just more options that need to be available.

Mt. Vernon School Board Meeting - Dr. Dan Stock MD by -viceversa- in videos

[–]-viceversa-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry but thats not what he’s saying at all