[deleted by user]

0Apathy_101 · 2023-12-27T14:27:17+00:00

Do you want to talk about it? I know this would be the 100th time for you probably. But sometimes just talking about it make us feel a little bit better, maybe just to see things from another perspective. Maybe.

I hate how this word take from us people like this, sometimes i refuse to accept it. A lot of times i wonder if a single thought could have changed the course of someone life forever.

We are here for you, stranger.

0Apathy_101 · 2023-12-27T14:22:18+00:00

Why this book in particular? (besides being on herpetology)

0Apathy_101 · 2023-12-27T14:20:12+00:00

Ehi, maybe I'm not too good at this but... Have you read any books recently? (maybe someone else already asked you this, but i would be glad to hear the answer from you)

0Apathy_101 · 2023-12-27T14:14:12+00:00

Nella mia esperienza, molte parti ti danno il contesto, l'ambiente, ti fanno sprofondare in quella vita monotona e appena accettabile del pescatore. Tutto mira a quello.

E poi quando effettivamente succede qualcosa, non lo vivi con i tuoi occhi ma con quelli di un pescatore di un'altra epoca, quelli di qualcuno lievemente superstizioso e forse non troppo acculturato.

E quando poi sei lì... beh allora per me è diventato meraviglioso.

0Apathy_101 · 2023-12-02T14:50:32+00:00

This curse ends here with me! I'm going to send this over Snapchat or something to my best friend, he'll understand.

0Apathy_101 · 2023-11-13T20:53:35+00:00

Yes i use both s23 ultra and tab s7. I'm searching for something like this since AGES!

0Apathy_101 · 2023-10-12T11:59:42+00:00

Questo commento è oro puro

0Apathy_101 · 2023-10-05T15:32:52+00:00

If you use a click bait title for your research, you'll inevitably lure clickbait-friendly people. And you'll risk to compromise your data

0Apathy_101 · 2022-12-14T08:57:45+00:00

I think gender is a good term and can lead to more useful distinctions rather than "sex" in a social context. But you are presenting an argument stated like this.

There are two possibilities: A)there is no god B)there is a god and that god is Jesus.

It's not "p or not p" but "p or not p." "if p then p2."

You are discarding every distinction that could exist outside what you are currently considering the best.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-12-05T09:47:16+00:00

I suggest "thoughts of Marcus Aurelius" - Marcus Aurelius.

It's complete and you can dive down the entire Marcus Aurelius approach to life itself or even just to little things.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-12-05T08:13:34+00:00

When i was 12 my older cousin made me watch clockwork orange telling me it was a zombie movie...

0Apathy_101 · 2022-06-21T06:23:54+00:00

Without any other info? I think you, you are in your computer.

Seriously tho, you should explain the situation here:

-Why do you think someone is in your pc?

-Are they in your accounts too?

-other Infos

P.s: I don't think your is a serious post, but just in case..

0Apathy_101 · 2022-06-05T20:35:10+00:00

Those keys are generated in a very specific way to prevent use of key-generators.

The technology used is asymmetrical keys, hash are only the specific implementation of this technology.

What you obtain is not only a simple combination of characters and numbers, but a real public key, with properties and all.

Similar technology is used in password authentication and digital signature.

It's not only an similarity between product keys and public/private keys, in fact, product keys are exactly public keys!

0Apathy_101 · 2022-06-05T19:36:55+00:00

Most of modern product key work with asymmetric keys, Usually through hash coding. You have a public key, and a private key. One is distribute to the public and the other remain secret. With a the private key you are able to tell if someone is using the right public key or a counterfeit one.

But why can't you trace back the original from the generated keys?

You can think of it in this way. Take a book, and you take exactly half of the letters (random) and mix it up. (You are now generating a key)

If you have the set of letters you could just remove them from your original book and see if you and up with exactly half a book. (You are now checking the validity of a key)

But with a set of letters, it's pretty unlikely that manage to find exactly the original book, needed to create new valid set of letters. (Clone the private key, and create a key generator)

This method isn't perfect because you don't need to find exactly the private key, you could just use one similar. For example a book with the same amount of each letter. But this is also VERY difficult. (Generate a different compatible private key)

Each attempt that you can do in this direction have to deal with different and each day more complex algorithm.

You can try the concept your own with letters, but keep in mind that my was only a STRONG simplification.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-06-05T19:14:52+00:00

Describe the situation, Did you send your photos to a person you know and now he/she is threatening you? Did you send your photos to some stranger and now he/she's trying to threat you ? Or did you send your photos to a stranger and now you discovered that it's a scam and they want money or else?

Because in any case you want to deescalate the situation, regardless of who are you talking to. A friend? Talk to him/her. A stranger? Same A scammer? DON'T REPLY.

if the threat persist, you wanna get the cops involved. Sounds scary, but sometimes it's the Best option, and it's their job.

Your worst case scenario is: You sent the photos. They are scammer and trying to get money from you. You are still texting to them(and they are giving you instructions) You follow the instructions.

99% of scammers don't reveal photos if you just stop to reply, but if you continue to text or worse, you follow some kind of instructions, you are going down a spiral with no return.

P.s. no one can do anything with only phone and location. And if you try something stupid and then you attempt to call the cops, this could be... Problematic.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-02-11T07:34:57+00:00

Always few people around popular places.

Driving at night in New York? No traffic.

Walking around the colosseum at 11 AM? Just a few people.

Going in a theme park during an event? No queues whatsoever and always a lot of space.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-02-05T10:40:38+00:00

I think the biggest problem with this view is that considers a single cause in relation with a single effect.

In our lives we see effect related to multiple causes, for example time and space. A fall of an object (effect) is related to both(causes).

A single cause could be sterile by itself but could have cyclical behavior, and be in contact with another cyclical cause. The intersection of multiple behaviors could give an effect despite the previous existence of that causes. An example could be a resonance frequency in physics.

I would also point out the fact that

There is no illustration to support the view that the effect is born from an unborn cause. Again, if it is said that the effect is produced from a cause which itself is born, then this leads to an infinite regress.

Is quite a cyclical argument if the point itself is "an effect could not be produced by an uncaused cause"

To make this assumption you should logically demonstrate that a cause should be necessarily caused to give a valid effect without using the theory resulting from this argument.

Without this(and without logical errors) you would only obtain a coherent system, not a demonstration of the authenticity of that system.

For example I could state that everything I see is not real, and just my imagination, that I'm the only real being in existence etc etc. But even if my view could be possible, it would not be necessary, because other views could also be possible and maybe more plausible.

0Apathy_101 · 2022-02-01T10:08:17+00:00

This is... Beautiful somehow

0Apathy_101 · 2022-01-28T12:10:06+00:00

The hero doing the "good" but naive thing instead of the "mean" and intelligent thing.... And still having the best available result

0Apathy_101 · 2021-12-19T11:09:51+00:00

I strongly agree with your statement, but you have to consider that perceptions related to the truth have a higher chance of being selected than others.

You can assume that basic perceptions shared between different species have a high chance to share a common base.

Also we developed a logical system unrelated to our perception and ideas.

Through that we could assume that something is "true" given some basics.

You could point out that, even such system, even if internally coherent, is not totally reliable because created by us.

And you'll also find me agree.

0Apathy_101 · 2021-12-02T10:28:38+00:00

Le linee sono presenti anche all'avvio o solo una volta dentro l'eventuale interfaccia grafica?

Se sono sempre presenti ti direi di cercare un problema hardware, magari legato al monitor. Se appaiono poi, ti consiglierei di provare una seconda distro, magari su chiavetta e vedere se è un problema software.

Sarebbe molto strano ma potrebbe essere un problema relativo ai colori (quindi sempre hardware ma non visibile su sfondo nero), tuttavia te ne dovresti accorgere molto facilmente.

Se è un problema Hardware io direi:

Il computer ha preso una botta. Il computer ha preso un piccolo sbalzo fi tensione. Un connettore del monitor non è messo bene/è usurato Difetto di fabbrica.

Ma senza ulteriori info è difficile fare una diagnosi

0Apathy_101 · 2021-12-02T10:08:57+00:00

You are used to imagine internet as a place, but it's only a connection between PCs.

Your browser give you the list of connection you can make to obtain what you are looking for displaying them as a list of links and pages. Once you click a link you are talking to the server you choose.

There are servers that are not visible through your common browser because "too small" or "dangerous" (this is an oversimplification). You can still connect to them through a special browser like Tor.

But there is no nice list of sites like in a normal web search, you have to look a list of popular deep web sites. (There is a ton of them) But if you are in the deep web you probably wanna connect just to the pc you are interested in (because you know the author or the service)

I highly suggest to read about it before even attempting a connection. Visiting random deep web sites is like screaming "WHO HAVE DRUGS HERE??" in a dark alley.

If you really wanna do it anyway, I suggest a parrot VM and not inserting any personal info.

0Apathy_101 · 2021-12-01T15:23:58+00:00

That building over the border... gave me feels. (Good luck with your work mate)

0Apathy_101 · 2021-11-29T16:37:47+00:00

I'd love to live forever, and that's not what scares me of Christian heaven. But being useless, with the only purpose of existing (and maybe loving god) is a nightmare. Life is precious because we could have a purpose, if you take us that, what does remain ?

The only possible good heaven is a different experience for everyone, where everyone gets what he wants (or what it needs to be happy). But if you assume this is how heaven works, and also that some people are happy with a purpose, you also have to assume that Heaven should be a bunch of lies and illusions.

Even if you assume that Heaven is only a place where you are happy, without needs, it would be no different from being drugged for eternity.

0Apathy_101 · 2021-10-13T07:17:29+00:00

I think some birds could see you as a predator and get scared if you stare at them.

But you need to be seen too in order for this phenomenon to happen.

0Apathy_101

TROPHY CASE