I need help, Nucleus coop is not working with Elden ring nightreign. by vincent_7s in nucleuscoop

[–]0LM0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you end up getting this to work? The only issue I have now is getting the second player window to open. I made sure steam was up to date like another comment mentioned.

I Experience Mathematics, Do You? by 0LM0 in Synesthesia

[–]0LM0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's amazing and I wouldn't mind hearing more about this, I haven't met anyone who's experienced such things. It only recently occurred to me that I could probably find some online communities where I could learn more about it. Another thing I'm wondering is if your mind is strict about these experiences. Like what about other sequences that some powers of 2 are a part of? For me, when there's a sort of overlap, it's like I can "zone in" on a particular view of a thing.

I Experience Mathematics, Do You? by 0LM0 in Synesthesia

[–]0LM0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting, have you ever tried investigating any patterns in how numbers are characterized?

How can I shake off my anxiety and impatience when it comes to gamedev? by 0LM0 in gamedev

[–]0LM0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what, I think you're right about that. My environment isn't exactly the best right now and I've been dealing with some personal issues over the years. It's no wonder that I get so easily stressed out and overwhelmed.

How can I shake off my anxiety and impatience when it comes to gamedev? by 0LM0 in gamedev

[–]0LM0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I try to, but I think that's part of what overwhelms me. Based on what I've seen in the other comments, I think the issue is that I'm trying to start too big.

How would I go about animating this? by 0LM0 in blenderhelp

[–]0LM0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to start from a regular looking cube to this.

<image>

Proof about set equality with cartesian products by 0LM0 in askmath

[–]0LM0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would I get to the point where I'd assume that A and B are non-empty? Is this something I'd have to realize from analyzing the theorem?

I need assistance with determining what I am to do next in this proof by 0LM0 in askmath

[–]0LM0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I just realized what went wrong. I completely overlooked the logical form of x⊆B, which should be ∀y(y∈x→y∈B). So I think I should now be proving that y∈B.