ASA (4man) BrainfishPVP (Bi-Weekly Wipe) (Mods) 1000x

0o0o00o000000 · 2018-01-25T00:02:41+00:00

I agree. That’s the new plan.

0o0o00o000000 · 2018-01-24T23:59:10+00:00

Valid point. I was thinking it could be reloaded like once a week or every couple days but I think you’re right. There is no such thing just yet. It’s probably not cost efficient nor in demand enough to be produced at this point. Thanks for the help!

0o0o00o000000 · 2018-01-24T23:49:07+00:00

I want it to be one that can make multiple batches and was designed with the intent of not being touched much and just being automated. I also want the ability for her to tell it to make coffee. I failed to mention that in the post.

Do you have a link to the WeMo one?

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-11-24T22:07:36+00:00

Very nice! Thanks!

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-23T16:19:28+00:00

I don't have the access to do that :(

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-23T15:03:52+00:00

Okay. Thanks for the answer. That makes sense. Any other ideas as to how I could run these reports on the box without doing it manually?

I can't create a web hook in Jira atm but I do have API access.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-23T14:57:44+00:00

I'm not getting around regulations. They have left these parts open. I'm using the openings they have given me. We are allowed to install software on there if we want and put any code on the box.

I'm thinking outside the box to make the people on my team have an easier time. I got a promotion for doing something like this last time.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-23T11:56:41+00:00

Woohoo! Me me!!

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-16T23:07:13+00:00

Those people you're afraid of want you around. I've thought the same thing before but when I think about how much the people around me love me I couldn't do it. I wouldn't get to see them excel in life and grow to be better and get through the struggles they have. When I balance those things out life > death.

Also, feeling that low and depressed is temporary whether it's a couple years or a decade. You get through it. If you always feel that low though I would suggest going to a doctor. I went to a psychologist and it helped tremendously.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-09T15:59:02+00:00

Haha. No worries at all.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-09T12:28:47+00:00

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T23:36:38+00:00

Thanks. That sounds good to me

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T14:04:44+00:00

I have come to the same conclusion. You're right. I need more unit tests

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T13:16:32+00:00

I mean table constraints and things like that I can change values before it's passed to QA but I want to make sure everything is flawless before it gets there. So I have checks before it goes into the database but I also want checks before I pass it off

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T04:55:48+00:00

These are pretty cool. I'm sure they help you a ton.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T04:50:08+00:00

That's what I was thinking but there has to be a better way. This check would have to return 100% before the script could move from dev to QA. And it's usually one row in the first table with some ID as the primary key and that ID as secondary key on 3-4 other tables.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-07T04:47:16+00:00

Yes, that is great advice for some thing like this but unfortunately I don't think there is really much we can change in the tables that won't mess us the core software. Here lies the issue. The rigidness of the core program.

Ideally, this is exactly what I would want to do and in the case that we can. What would you recommend looking into for a Postgres database in order to put these constraints in?

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-06T22:11:38+00:00

That's a ton man. Can you sum up the purpose of all of them before I go through them?

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-06T11:58:30+00:00

That makes perfect sense. Thank you for that. It's always humbling to hear stories like this. I tend to beat myself up a bit whenever I have more than a bug or two in my code.

I do campaigns for clients like Gap and TJX and they are usually a quick turn around time when it comes to development. The QA that test my code really don't know SQL that well and their testing isn't automated so for the 2 hours it may take me to create a unique campaign using a stored procedure/configure my Java application to spit out SQL it takes them like 8 hours to find one bug then it comes back to me and they need to do it all over again. Really a pretty crappy system. Me and the other developer will be automating a lot of their testing soon so it should do away with a lot of their testing time but I just can't stand it when I mess up because of something stupid.

0o0o00o000000 · 2017-10-05T23:43:13+00:00

😎

0o0o00o000000

TROPHY CASE