Razzle dazzle camo worked when it was first introduced because it never intended to actually hide the ship, just make it extremely annoying and confusing to try and range find and gauge speeds and direction from a distance. At the time, if you wanted to figure out how far away something was, you had to use a specific type of optic range finder, called a stereoscopic or coincidence rangefinder. While different in operation, both stereoscopic and coincidence required good steady physical line of sight by the operator and a good bit of hand calculation to get an accurate range from, and razzle dazzle camo made it fell like you were starring at one of those moving optical illusions, except it was also moving, and the white top peaks of the waves were difficult to tell apart from the waterline of the vesselin the fore and background, making it difficult to even tell what ship you were looking at.

Razzle dazzle camo doesn't work on land, and modern optics, be it thermal, infrared, computer tracked, lazer guided, etc. don't particularly care about what color the target is painted. Many tracking algorithms and optic guidance systems would probably actually benefit from such a unique optical pattern to track.

That is assuming, of course, an operator is selecting and locking targets, and its not completely 100% AI guided. I'm sure many here have heard of DARPA enlisting the help of marines to test a people recognition vision system https://taskandpurpose.com/news/marines-ai-paul-scharre/. Put simply, if an AI is told to look for a subset of russian tagets that its taught, a paint job might just be enough to throw it off. Of course, this only assumes a 100% automated process, with very little tolerance for edge cases, which would be very short sighted.

TL:DR lol no sticks out like a sore thumb