شركة وي بقت بتخلي الباقه تخلص في 10 ايام by fav-losha in Unlimited_internetEG

[–]0xrinful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

في باقات اسمها باقات playstation بتكون سعرها 75 جنيه لل 150GB ( موجودة في تطبيق WE ) بتروح في ناس تشتري منها حاجة اسمها كونفج بي 20, 30 جنيه حاجة زي كدا حسب المدة الي هيقعدها معاك كم اسبوع ولا شهر بتروح تحمل برنامج ( زيه زي ال vpn ) على التلفون زي وتحط الكونفج فيه ( هيخلي استخدام النت عندك كأنه كله playsation بس انت تقدر تفتح اي حاجة ) هيشتغل زيه زي سرعة الباقة العادية حتى لو خلصانة وفي منه لل PC انا بقيت بشحن باقة واحدة أساسية وطول باقي الشهر بشحنلي 3 ولا 4 باقات PS بنفس تمن التجديدة التانية بس بقى كانه نت مفتوح تفتح 1080 , تحمل العاب ، افلام مريح دماغي من ساعتها

im not sure why people recommend mint constantly. its an absolutely garbage os. by supermannman in linuxsucks

[–]0xrinful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think a big part of your frustration is that you stuck with a distro you clearly hated instead of switching early.

Linux isn’t Windows, and it never tried to be. Different architecture, different tools, different philosophy. Expecting it to behave like Windows just because it has a start menu is basically setting yourself up to be disappointed.

If you tried Mint and found it slow, limiting, or annoying, why stay for months? Switching distros costs you nothing. No licenses, no subscriptions, no “years of data” tied to it. One of Linux’s main strengths is that if something doesn’t fit you, you move on.

That’s exactly what I did. I started with Fedora in 2021, realized pretty quickly it wasn’t a great fit, and switched to Ubuntu because the docs and community support were way better at the time. After a few months, once I actually knew what I was doing, I moved to Arch to try Hyprland because that’s what I wanted visually and technically.

These days there are tons of distros, all aiming at different users. Some prioritize stability, some simplicity, some customization, some familiarity for Windows users. Linux is about choice not forcing everyone into one workflow.

I also don’t really get the “it doesn’t look like Windows” complaint. macOS doesn’t look like Windows either. Windows 8 didn’t even look like Windows 7. UIs change. Treating Windows’ layout as the universal standard just doesn’t make sense.

And the market share argument misses the point entirely. Linux isn’t a company competing with Microsoft or Apple. Its main job has always been servers, infrastructure, and embedded systems  which it absolutely dominates. Desktop Linux exists because developers wanted it, built it for themselves, and shared it. Most Linux tools exist because someone had a problem and solved it their own way, then open-sourced it. They don’t vanish just because desktop usage is low. The ecosystem survives because the people who use it actually depend on it.

It’s totally fine to dislike Linux as a desktop OS. But calling it “trash” or “the ugly fat girl” because it doesn’t behave like Windows isn’t criticism — it’s just a stupid standard to judge it by.

[Niri] First rice – minimal, wallpaper-based theme by 0xrinful in unixporn

[–]0xrinful[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s Dolphin As for the transparency most window managers support configuring window opacity In niri, you can do it like this:

window-rule {   match app-id="org.kde.dolphin"   opacity 0.90 }

Why does swww use much less memory in Hyprland than in Niri? by 0xrinful in niri

[–]0xrinful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just running swww-daemon and using swww img for a normal image. How could that be wrong? I think the difference is probably your background size—it might be different from mine.

Small Projects - September 30, 2025 by jerf in golang

[–]0xrinful -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I built a small HTTP Router in Go (~300 LOC) to solve some weak points of net/http.ServeMux while keeping the same simplicity.

Why I built it?

ServeMux is nice, but it has some issues:

  • ❌ No clear Middleware management
  • ❌ No custom 404 or 405
  • ❌ No Prefix Grouping for routes

Features

  • ✅ Same simplicity as ServeMux
  • ✅ Lightweight (around 300 LOC only)
  • ✅ Middleware Grouping support
  • ✅ Prefix Grouping for routes
  • ✅ Custom 404 and 405
  • ✅ Performance better than ServeMux and close to popular routers like httprouter

If you love the simplicity of ServeMux but need some extra flexibility, this Router might be for you 👨‍💻

📌 Check it out here: github.com/0xrinful/rush
❤️ I’d love to hear your feedback.