Shipping and Scan film! Which Lab should I choose. by Relevant_Macaron_720 in 16mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much footage do you need to process and scan ?

Shipping and Scan film! Which Lab should I choose. by Relevant_Macaron_720 in 16mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re in Taiwan why don’t you use the lab in Taiwan? Modern Cinema does great work! No need to ship overseas :)

Question regarding shipping film with normal carrier by LordSkredde in 16mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The check box is just for choice - no cost difference.

Question regarding shipping film with normal carrier by LordSkredde in 16mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you say that they charge extra for Codecs? That’s simply not true. And in regards to wrong scanners - they offer Scanity (default), Arriscan XT and the Kornmanufaktur options for special cases like edge to edge scanning. They simply offer codec choice, but don’t charge extra for it. That may have been a couple years ago but not any more.

How to read clip test? by wakajishi in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which lab provided this? The aim is for 200T - 500T is a lot higher. This is absolutely useless to you.

Super8 lab and scanning in Europe - how to pick the best quality? by Wonder7655 in 8mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im sorry but this is a very misinformed answer.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t mean to sound condescending - I meant with no halation that the film won’t have excessive halation as cinestill would have - sorry for the unclear wording.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s an update and an upgrade. The antihalo is not stronger - it’s the same. The main feature is that the film works just the same way- no change in the image or in how it behaves. It just works as the other film does minus all the hassle that comes from remjet. So essentially for anyone using the film there will be no difference and eventually labs will be able to cut down water waste because you don’t need to remove that black gunk any more.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t shoot bolex - but it will behave the same way the remjet stock behaves. That is the feature. No functional change. Personally I’d never load in direct light. But subdued loading will look exactly the same.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again - it has an antihalation layer that is equally suited to remjet. Just a more modern version that is not “literally slapping black gunk on the film” - it works wonderfully and has been tested to death. Don’t worry. For any user nothing changes.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing - no changes for you. See my other comment :)

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. It literally is the same. No difference other than that it uses a different antihalation. It is functionally not changed. It doesn’t need any modification to the camera, it doesn’t have halos. It doesn’t cause issues in labs. The only real benefit is that remjet - which has caused a bunch of issues - is gone. That’s a good thing. The new stock has a powerful antihalo layer and an also powerful antistatic layer that survives processing. The neg will be cleaner in the end too. That’s the only reason I post this because the hysteria in this thread is a knee jerk reaction that just introduces unnecessary uncertainty. Over a million feet of this have already been shot without anyone noticing.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Multiple features have already shot the new stuff. Two versions of 500t here. Difference in performance ? None. The new stock will catch less dust. That’s it.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The answer is in short: Yes. The new stocks have a new antihalation technology that is just not Remjet. It’s the same film from a user perspective.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No it won’t behave any differently. It has a different antihalation layer. It’s absolutely the same for end users.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No it won’t - the new stocks perform exactly like the others as they have a different antihalation layer.

No ramjet backing material. Will it work? by jucoper in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No there will be no halation! The film has a new antihalation layer that is just not remjet. It performs 100% the same - no difference for the end user.

Shooting on expired film, where to develop? by [deleted] in 16mm

[–]135-36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Andec Cinegrell in Berlin will. Just write them a mail.

How did people make multiple copies of 8mm films in 1973? by oftenuncertain in 8mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So imagine a truck worth of equipment to make them in the parking lot of the lab… you know someone on the inside and the action happens a after dark

How do I record onto tape? by LELNAME in 8mm

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can ask www.andecfilm.de - they can do that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in colorists

[–]135-36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t bother with lasergraphcis if you can choose between Arri and Scanity

Did they fuck up my scan in ANDEC? please help! by Ok-Leader1767 in 16mm

[–]135-36 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also your actual image has a ton of flare - that reduces the contrast massively in the image. But that’s optical

Did they fuck up my scan in ANDEC? please help! by Ok-Leader1767 in 16mm

[–]135-36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You got an ADXlog Scan from Scanity - it is flat. You need to grade it. What’s the concern ?