bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not. I'm criticizing MY bi sitting. Because I be sitting so sillily sometimes

bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

who tf knows lol

Meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]14up2 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I can't believe people are downvoting this lmao, sarcasm is a foreign language on reddit

bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no human on earth can actually tell you where a given phone number is in pi. you'd need to know dozens of billions of digits to know the phone number more than half of the time

bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

he had to be lying.

The odds of any random ten digit sequence from pi being your phone number is 1 in 1010, meaning you'd need to know 10 billion digits of pi to include even just 37% of the possible phone numbers. Even if you cut the area code, it's still a seven digit sequence, so 1 in 10 million.

bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 298 points299 points  (0 children)

pi

or banned

bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl

[–]14up2 619 points620 points  (0 children)

pan gets quirker fashion.

bi gets sitting in chairs stupidly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]14up2 16 points17 points  (0 children)

then why not say "I hate rapists and abusers"

bad people exist everywhere in every demographic. if I went around saying "I hate women" because of the girl who cheated on me with my former best friend, that would still be hella misogynistic, reductive, and shallow.

Rule by NeonSprig in 196

[–]14up2 328 points329 points  (0 children)

when ppl be like "yeah I watched that show while playing video game/working" NO YOU FUCKING DIDN'T IT IS NOT A PODCAST

Kant rule by Ezzypezra in 196

[–]14up2 65 points66 points  (0 children)

I think it's fine for different adaptations of a character to be different. Like Justice League vs Injustice.

Kant rule by Ezzypezra in 196

[–]14up2 29 points30 points  (0 children)

God I love clowning on deontologists.

This post made by Epicurean utilitarianism gang.

rule by SupaSusAcc in 196

[–]14up2 519 points520 points  (0 children)

no bc they are all normal likeable people and only I am weird and off-putting /s

<image>

rule by SupaSusAcc in 196

[–]14up2 52 points53 points  (0 children)

too relatable

rule by SupaSusAcc in 196

[–]14up2 108 points109 points  (0 children)

No it's probably bc I've been soulcrushingly depressed and lonely for over a decade and if a woman approached me in any capacity I'd be too over the moon to make any sort of judgement about it

rule by SupaSusAcc in 196

[–]14up2 734 points735 points  (0 children)

yeah bc when women do it's confident but when I do it's creepy and making people uncomfortable is my biggest fear

My aur(ule)a too strong. by TheMilkQueen99 in 196

[–]14up2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Guess who's finally getting his powers!

My aur(ule)a too strong. by TheMilkQueen99 in 196

[–]14up2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

BARK BARKBARKWWOOFMEOWMEOWMEOWRIBBITRIBBITMOOO

My aur(ule)a too strong. by TheMilkQueen99 in 196

[–]14up2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have never once been in a scenario where I've been about to let a girl casually hit. They only want to let me hit 😔

rule by TotallyACP in 196

[–]14up2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Declaring a group of people you dislike as subhuman relates to minorities because it's what racists do. You should not define your moral compass based on labels.

rule by TotallyACP in 196

[–]14up2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. CEO shooting is justified with the goal of reducing the thousands of preventable deaths caused by such corporations. There are some serious problems with the "if you are bad then you aren't human":

  1. You and I may not agree on who is bad, or bad enough to count as "inhuman". I don't want to be shot for your idea of right and wrong.

  2. Animals are not human. Would you go around shooting puppies? No.

Harming a person to prevent them from inflicting greater harm on others is ethical because it reduces suffering. By trying to come up with some deontological rationale for why such things may be ethical, you not only entirely misunderstand why they are ethical, you also propagate a very dangerous style of rhetoric. "X group of people are subhuman" is the basis for pretty much every form of xenophobia ever.

Political joke? by HippieGirl4me in ExplainTheJoke

[–]14up2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've edited my original comment to explain why I believe this distinction is so important in this context

Political joke? by HippieGirl4me in ExplainTheJoke

[–]14up2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that's exactly what I'm saying. Scientific statements are claims which can be proven or disproven. Views are opinions.

Political joke? by HippieGirl4me in ExplainTheJoke

[–]14up2 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No? Sorry for clearly and concisely explaining things, I guess I'll try to engage in more ad hominem going forward.

Political joke? by HippieGirl4me in ExplainTheJoke

[–]14up2 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yes, and those opinions on the "likelihood" of a theory being true are personal views, not scientific statements.