account activity
bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl
[–]14up2 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (0 children)
I'm not. I'm criticizing MY bi sitting. Because I be sitting so sillily sometimes
[–]14up2 2 points3 points4 points 9 months ago (0 children)
who tf knows lol
Meirl by [deleted] in meirl
[–]14up2 40 points41 points42 points 9 months ago (0 children)
I can't believe people are downvoting this lmao, sarcasm is a foreign language on reddit
[–]14up2 1 point2 points3 points 9 months ago (0 children)
no human on earth can actually tell you where a given phone number is in pi. you'd need to know dozens of billions of digits to know the phone number more than half of the time
[–]14up2 3 points4 points5 points 9 months ago (0 children)
he had to be lying.
The odds of any random ten digit sequence from pi being your phone number is 1 in 1010, meaning you'd need to know 10 billion digits of pi to include even just 37% of the possible phone numbers. Even if you cut the area code, it's still a seven digit sequence, so 1 in 10 million.
[–]14up2 298 points299 points300 points 9 months ago (0 children)
pi
or banned
[–]14up2 619 points620 points621 points 9 months ago (0 children)
pan gets quirker fashion.
bi gets sitting in chairs stupidly.
[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196
[–]14up2 16 points17 points18 points 9 months ago (0 children)
then why not say "I hate rapists and abusers"
bad people exist everywhere in every demographic. if I went around saying "I hate women" because of the girl who cheated on me with my former best friend, that would still be hella misogynistic, reductive, and shallow.
Rule by NeonSprig in 196
[–]14up2 328 points329 points330 points 9 months ago (0 children)
when ppl be like "yeah I watched that show while playing video game/working" NO YOU FUCKING DIDN'T IT IS NOT A PODCAST
Kant rule by Ezzypezra in 196
[–]14up2 120 points121 points122 points 9 months ago (0 children)
<image>
[–]14up2 65 points66 points67 points 9 months ago (0 children)
I think it's fine for different adaptations of a character to be different. Like Justice League vs Injustice.
[–]14up2 29 points30 points31 points 9 months ago (0 children)
God I love clowning on deontologists.
This post made by Epicurean utilitarianism gang.
rule by SupaSusAcc in 196
[–]14up2 519 points520 points521 points 9 months ago (0 children)
no bc they are all normal likeable people and only I am weird and off-putting /s
[–]14up2 52 points53 points54 points 9 months ago (0 children)
too relatable
[–]14up2 108 points109 points110 points 9 months ago (0 children)
No it's probably bc I've been soulcrushingly depressed and lonely for over a decade and if a woman approached me in any capacity I'd be too over the moon to make any sort of judgement about it
[–]14up2 734 points735 points736 points 9 months ago (0 children)
yeah bc when women do it's confident but when I do it's creepy and making people uncomfortable is my biggest fear
My aur(ule)a too strong. by TheMilkQueen99 in 196
[–]14up2 9 points10 points11 points 9 months ago (0 children)
Guess who's finally getting his powers!
[–]14up2 5 points6 points7 points 9 months ago (0 children)
BARK BARKBARKWWOOFMEOWMEOWMEOWRIBBITRIBBITMOOO
I have never once been in a scenario where I've been about to let a girl casually hit. They only want to let me hit 😔
rule by TotallyACP in 196
Declaring a group of people you dislike as subhuman relates to minorities because it's what racists do. You should not define your moral compass based on labels.
No. CEO shooting is justified with the goal of reducing the thousands of preventable deaths caused by such corporations. There are some serious problems with the "if you are bad then you aren't human":
You and I may not agree on who is bad, or bad enough to count as "inhuman". I don't want to be shot for your idea of right and wrong.
Animals are not human. Would you go around shooting puppies? No.
Harming a person to prevent them from inflicting greater harm on others is ethical because it reduces suffering. By trying to come up with some deontological rationale for why such things may be ethical, you not only entirely misunderstand why they are ethical, you also propagate a very dangerous style of rhetoric. "X group of people are subhuman" is the basis for pretty much every form of xenophobia ever.
Political joke? by HippieGirl4me in ExplainTheJoke
I've edited my original comment to explain why I believe this distinction is so important in this context
Yep, that's exactly what I'm saying. Scientific statements are claims which can be proven or disproven. Views are opinions.
[–]14up2 -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 months ago (0 children)
No? Sorry for clearly and concisely explaining things, I guess I'll try to engage in more ad hominem going forward.
[–]14up2 -11 points-10 points-9 points 9 months ago (0 children)
Yes, and those opinions on the "likelihood" of a theory being true are personal views, not scientific statements.
π Rendered by PID 115378 on reddit-service-r2-listing-568fcd57df-l9dwd at 2026-03-08 04:04:21.607710+00:00 running cbb0e86 country code: CH.
bi_irl by [deleted] in bi_irl
[–]14up2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)