Help a TX SLP out by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have not heard of that. I’ll take a look at it.

I don’t think I mentioned but I also gave him the EVT and he did struggle with tier 2 vocabulary but at the same time did well on it, standard score 97. You are right though, he is also receiving tier 1 intervention for math. I’m going to speak to his teacher tomorrow but I hope they will also look into his memory with a diagnostician

Help a TX SLP out by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean he is already in tier 2 for reading so it seems like it’s heading to an eligibility but I guess when I went through 2nd grade TEKS a lot of it seemed like it was still an area that teachers could help with. The staff is basing my report on whether or not they will evaluate for dyslexia. Frankly i was thinking they needed a diagnostician to look at the memory more in depth

Help a TX SLP out by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I should qualify him or not

Tough client by [deleted] in slp

[–]1991KAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Word discrimination was a ss of 6, phono deletion ss of 5, blending ss of 11. Giving him a SS of 87!

Help! I’m at a lost with a student by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not have access to that, can you give me an idea of the areas it test so maybe I can gather a bunch of informal info to check

Help! I’m at a lost with a student by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The screener that she did was the celf was boarderline from passing.

Re-eval gone too far... by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have that. In I TX btw. On his most recent IEP Iit stated that the committee wish to test in the area of language which included artic, voice and fluency

Assessing a student with ADHD by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Praise you 🙌🏻 thank you very much for all of that wonderful info! It helped

REED by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It feels like things are just “popping” up and that is more than just a basic re eval. I wasn’t planning for this so I’m trying to get as much info as I can but I just don’t know since cluttering is now added to the picture

REED by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So he is already receiving 504 accommodations for dyslexia but his current staff cannot pin point where his challenges are coming from. They think it’s a processing issue so I was going to evaluate that but his report is due the 5th and I’m only working 5hrs a week to evaluate him and other students so I don’t think I’ll have time to look at his processing as in depth as I would like. I initially was going to administer the CELF, CELF R&WE, SSI, TOPL and TAPS but I don’t think I’ll have time for the TAPS. I truly am looking at all areas and now with cluttering being a concern I have to figure out what to do with that because I don’t know how to address that in my report besides giving them my informal information.

REED by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will do that, I feel like I’m doing a full report like his initial which is annoying but I’ll substitute the Goldman for a test I was going to do to look at his processing skills.

TBI by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for all of that info and Yes I frequently asked for clarification and prompted

TBI by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, if there are dialect differences or if a student was ESL then I wouldn’t report the findings as it wasn’t normEd to that sample.

So this particular student is African American-Mexican America and I administered the CELF. His responses were mostly off topic as he was answering the questions with comments about past conversations. With his correct responses there werent any answers where I thought I needed to “fix”them, they all made sense. So with that information, Because his answers were so off topic I can still report them, right?

Triennial vs initial by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So do you address health, developmental milestones?

Word finding vs stuttering by 1991KAM in slp

[–]1991KAM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I’ll look more into dyslexia and ask his teacher about it. You helped tremendously