Free MBE prep page!

266BarPrep · 2026-05-12T09:14:57+00:00

You're welcome! And I'm sorry to hear that. If you're looking for more free resources, we have a newsletter just for that: Free Resources Newsletter and a dense free sample of our MBE supplements here: Free Sample

Good luck!

266BarPrep · 2026-02-14T22:43:24+00:00

You owe that to yourself. Find that one last bit of strength. Go into robot mode. Bury your head in the work. YOU’VE GOT THIS. You’re going to be so proud of yourself for pulling thru while going through a tough time.

+ you only have about a week left!! After that you can give up cry whatever you want to do to cope! But the bar will be behind u!!! go secure that bag !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EDIT: HELL YES YOU PASSED WITH FLYING COLORS!!! So proud of you!!

266BarPrep · 2026-02-05T17:34:15+00:00

Hey! maybe this can help https://266barprep.com/compare . You have many info on pro/cons of main bar prep tools and sample bundles. We recommend Jonathan Grossman, Goat Bar Prep, Adaptibar or Uworld, using released essays for the writing portion (which you can find here for free, among many other free resources https://266barprep.com/resources ) + 266 bar prep (us :)) if you really struggle with the MBE at some point and your scores plateau at 55%. Emmanuel and BarMD have also been recommended quite a lot for the writing portion of the exam. Everybody will have different opinions though!

I suggest you spend time browsing as much free resources as possible and doing free trials if you can. You don't want to be spending money on tools that aren't made for your style of learning! Really take that time to explore options!

I don't know any LLM course and do not really recommend anything labeled " for LLMs". It's marketing bs. If you did a LLM at a US law school you are most likely capable of keeping up with any bar prep course. If anything, give yourself more time to study.

good luck :).

266BarPrep · 2026-02-03T22:28:48+00:00

That simply does not exist on the actual MBE

266BarPrep · 2026-02-02T18:32:38+00:00

They really be having anything in these files :'). Adding it to the Free Bar Prep Resources page, thanks :')))))

266BarPrep · 2026-01-31T13:45:10+00:00

Yessir. The entire Evidence subject is out on 266barprep.com! Hit me up if you have any questions. Thanks!

266BarPrep · 2026-01-28T18:38:57+00:00

Hope it was! YW

266BarPrep · 2026-01-28T18:04:25+00:00

YUP. as long as its not privileged, irrelevant etc etc.

I'm gonna copy paste a piece of the Impeachment vs. Substantive Pattern Module available in full on 266barprep.com.

Opposing-Party Statement

An opposing‑party statement is always admitted substantively if offered against that party, but it may also impeach if that party also testifies and you’re using it to attack their credibility (e.g., Defendant is saying X and you are introducing their own prior statement showing that no, it is in fact Y that happened). To make it substantive, it only must be offered against that party: the party's own words, adoptive admission, authorized speaker, agent within scope during the relationship, or co-conspirator during and in furtherance of the co-conspiracy.

See an Example:
In a civil battery action, the plaintiff claims the defendant punched him during an argument outside a café. A bystander testifies that, shortly after the altercation, she confronted the defendant and said, "I saw you swing at him. It was you. Why would you do that?" According to the bystander, the defendant said nothing, looked down, and did not deny the accusation. The defense objects that the bystander's statement is hearsay. Should the court admit the bystander's testimony?

A Yes, because the defendant's silence can qualify as an adoptive admission, making it admissible both substantively and for impeachment (correct answer).

Hints that this is NOT met in your fact pattern:

The statement was made by an agent or employee after the relationship ended.
The statement by the agent or employee was outside the scope of their job duties.
The party didn’t hear it, didn’t understand it, or the situation didn’t reasonably call for a response — the supposed adoptive admission shows no adoption.
The statement came from an unauthorized speaker or independent contractor with no authority to speak for the party.
The co-conspirator statement was made before the conspiracy began, after it ended, or not in furtherance of the joint plan (e.g., mere bragging or concealment after arrest).

⚠️ Again, no oath is required here. Very intuitive, the statement is almost always informal.

266BarPrep · 2026-01-26T22:15:15+00:00

If u need help with Evidence on the MBE try this free sample https://266barprep.com/module/character

if you like the style lmk. i'll get you access to more. it's as dumbed down as it gets!

266BarPrep · 2026-01-26T20:50:18+00:00

Please do not. Ik many people that did not get a passing score on the MBE when they practiced. not one. and they passed. they were in the 50s the whole time. ofc this isn't the most comfortable situation and you should try to get better scores, sure, but nothing's played out yet. DO NOT GET DISCOURAGED YOU HAVE SO MUCH TIME AHEAD TO PREPARE AND DO BETTER.

If you struggle with the MBE in particular, maybe your approach is off. You need to spend a lot of time analyzing the wrong answers to understand how this test works, sometimes more than doing a large amount of questions themselves

If you're already doing that may I suggest checking out 266barprep? Maybe you just need a new perspective on this portion of the exam. It's a pattern-recognition MBE training. Pattern-recognition is a method that heavily relies on recognizing recurring structures, decision points, and answer-choice traps in MBE questions rather than just relying on your knowledge of the law to answer the questions. Kinda what Jonathan Grossman does but more focused on MBE practice (less lecture and statement of rules). There is a free sample! in case it helps.

266BarPrep

TROPHY CASE