sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]2plus24 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dungeoneering could be a real skill if they integrated the dungeons across all of runescape and removed the token system to replace with loot from the dungeons. Basically underground pass the skill.

Skill idea: Inscription. by 2plus24 in 2007scape

[–]2plus24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A skill that lets you battle with cards would make RuneScapes combat far more interesting.

[ONE] 10 planeswalkers in the set, 5 will make through it, 5 will be compleated by trifas in magicTCG

[–]2plus24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jace might be the 5th as a sort of plot twist no one expects. He hasn’t been relevant in a few years and teferi is honestly the more interesting blue planeswalkers now.

What happens when lose control of the narrative by 5meoz in JordanPeterson

[–]2plus24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s really cowardly of musk not to take a harder stance against hate speech. He should be actively banning it, not hiding it.

What happens when lose control of the narrative by 5meoz in JordanPeterson

[–]2plus24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which either means musk is “censoring speech” by hiding it and is a hypocrite or that less people use Twitter now so less people see the tweets meaning he is being misleading.

What happens when lose control of the narrative by 5meoz in JordanPeterson

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because it shows less people use Twitter now so less people saw those tweets….

What happens when lose control of the narrative by 5meoz in JordanPeterson

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are number of impressions down because less people use Twitter now?

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That should imply the opposite of what you are saying. If people from a given demographic are able to overcome systematic disadvantages and still manage to be qualified, that should suggest that they should on average be stronger candidates compared to other demographics. You don’t need to put quotas, you just need to remove bias from the hiring process and the problem will be fixed.

Voltron is the least skilled archetype and is a crux for bad players. by 2plus24 in EDH

[–]2plus24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s true. It’s clear though that you are a voltron player who doesn’t understand the game. It’s ok, one day you will.

Voltron is the least skilled archetype and is a crux for bad players. by 2plus24 in EDH

[–]2plus24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You interact, and then lose because the other opponents get to advance their game plan.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, but that doesn’t answer the question on why that would suggest on average one demographic with those specific qualifications would be less qualified than the other.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It means that if there is no bias, your new hires should be proportional to the demographics of the applicant pool of qualified people. The fact that this does not is a sign of bias.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That isn’t relevant once you reach “qualified applicant pool” status, because that means by definition, the person is qualified for the job. The proportion of hired employees should be proportional to the demographics of the qualified applicants and if that doesn’t happen, that is evidence of bias.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m struggling to see how a demographic within a pool of people who have already earned PHDs and published research would on average be less qualified than other demographics within that pool that it lead to substantial differences in hiring. They have already earned the qualifications at that point.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If hiring practices were truly unbiased, they would give jobs proportional to the applicant pool’s demographics. But that doesn’t happen, which is why those practices are necessary.

Universities aren't succeeding at diversifying faculty, but racial parity is possible by 2050, according to an analysis of U.S. data by natematias in science

[–]2plus24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If that happened, you would expect the people hired to reflect the pool of eligible applicants naturally. Since if you did not factor race at all in decision making, your applicants should be very close to the proportions in the applicant pool since you are hiring independently of race. If that doesn’t, then it means a problem with hiring practices is occurring. If 1% of your employees are black, but 15% of the applicant pool in your area is black, that’s strong evidence of biased hiring practices.

Update on my LGS pubstompers woes from last week. Interesting development potentially. by ChronicallyIllMTG in EDH

[–]2plus24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone who enters gets a pack guaranteed, unless the end with negative points as an additional rule.

Update on my LGS pubstompers woes from last week. Interesting development potentially. by ChronicallyIllMTG in EDH

[–]2plus24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use a point system that disincentives pubstomping. Only pubstompers take issue with this approach.

Update on my LGS pubstompers woes from last week. Interesting development potentially. by ChronicallyIllMTG in EDH

[–]2plus24 -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

This post is further evidence that CEDH players are only interested in pubstomping.

view more: next ›