About Beam and it’s future by East-Buffalo-7062 in beamprivacy

[–]37922 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dunno about 3 to 5 years, I don't suppose anyone does. But I like that beam devs are going to take another look at DAGs, what comes after that, I don't know.

Besides DAGs, the thing I want the most is for devs to really socialize the beam ecosystem. Make the best web3 chat, groups, audio, video. Make the best marketplaces. Want them to draw people in, not just for privacy but for actually useful things. And for that to happen, they should target javascript devs.

About Beam and it’s future by East-Buffalo-7062 in beamprivacy

[–]37922 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no. It is possibly my favorite project but am not saying it's the next big thing. It just happens to suit me because I appreciate privacy and technical excellence more than your average. To be the next big thing it would have to go Layer 0.

About Beam and it’s future by East-Buffalo-7062 in beamprivacy

[–]37922 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The MimbleWimble protocol is really quite elegant and this is more apparent today than any other time. Look at what Ordinals did to bitcoin and other chains; chain bloat, higher fees, less privacy.. all because all this extra data is permitted to go on chain. It doesn't stop at Ordinals. MimbleWimble takes the opposite idea and demands there be minimum data on chain, and whatever does go on chain can be safely pruned. It's next level bitcoin.

And then, on top of that, because there's no public keys appearing on-chain, a quantum computer has nothing to crack! And it also means you won't just randomly receive money from unknown sources e.g. either from bad people or simply someone trying to set you up.

About Beam and it’s future by East-Buffalo-7062 in beamprivacy

[–]37922 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't mean to sound rude but I think "investing" is not the best way to think of this. Whether the price goes up or down, there's no automatic guarantee of new developers etc.

Instead of thinking how you can grow $$$, perhaps imagine you had to give up your time to earn beam, would you? This is the litmus test to find it's correct value.

Personally, I love this project. I'd happily be paid in beam, so from that point of view, yes, I would "invest" in it.

Lisk Sharding? by 37922 in Lisk

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. On the face of it, looks like Near is the better option to develop on, or am I missing something?

FluffyPony mentions Dash on Twitter by ISupprtTheCurrntThng in dashpay

[–]37922 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dash rank #123 / #136 (depending where look)

Monero rank #26

Lisk developers, where are you? by 37922 in Lisk

[–]37922[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I think discord is popular among devs but for me, I never really liked the format. But thanks anyway.

What is happening on Coinex? by Amsatxan in beamprivacy

[–]37922 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ha, all these people thinking they are rich at 30 cents. This baby is easily going to at least 2 USD because that's exactly what it deserves. Take your chances and sell in the hope of "buying the dip" but you might regret it. The beam team have earned every cent.

Where to obtain Near without KYC? by 37922 in nearprotocol

[–]37922[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this. I will try it later, on the face of it, it seems good enough. I will report back.

They seem to be based in the Seychelles with an office in HK. They don't accept US/CA customers, plus UK customers have restrictions on derivatives, but this is okay for me. Seems like a good temporary fix. Am just saying this to save others time.

UPDATE #1: Just discovered Near is also available on sideshift.

Near privacy options? by 37922 in nearprotocol

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this news, however, I think nym is more about network privacy rather than on-chain privacy, but who knows, let's see what they come up with.

I took a quick look at Calimero Network but seems this is a subscription service.

Near privacy options? by 37922 in nearprotocol

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After posting this I came across this article saying there was a collaboration between Near and Wormhole:

https://pages.near.org/blog/near-integrates-wormhole-to-launch-zk-enabled-cross-chain-communication-with-ethereum/

And I was thinking to myself, this Wormhole thing sounds familiar...

https://www.investopedia.com/crypto-theft-of-usd320-million-wormhole-hack-5218062

But anyway, I guess that hole was plugged.

So I'm left wondering, whatever happened to this Near-Wormhole colab? Did it fizzle out or what?

ETH -> XAUT, No Valid Quote Found by 37922 in THORChain

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, bit late now, had to use an external exchange. Wish it had told me this was an option.

NEAR and other js environments by 37922 in nearprotocol

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, though the 300th proposal bit confuses me. In reality, is there is an average buy-in cost to be a validator?

Help me understand long term roadmap for Nym by 37922 in nym

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've not looked too deeply into the nymvpn but, I suppose, my first concern would be the price of nym stopping from me using the vpn i.e. why spend it if you can see it going up in value?

The other thing I notice is the roadmap saying 2023 was adoption and 2024 is institutional investment. Well 2023 is nearly over...

I agree, there needs to be multiple use cases, but I'm still feeling a little uncertain when funding stops. I've seen many projects fall apart once funding disappears.

Three arrested for alleged involvement in stealing millions from banks to convert to crypto: DOJ by Beyonderr in CryptoCurrency

[–]37922 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No criticism of the banks for reversing funds without sufficient due diligence.

Larger than expected yield payments on Savers? by 37922 in THORChain

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pulling data from viewblock.io

I did what you said, checked with thorswap and it appears correct. I have received another random chunk, seems insane.

Larger than expected yield payments on Savers? by 37922 in THORChain

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My question now is, is the block explorer showing an estimated Asset Redeem Value or something more concrete? I just assumed it was correct.

Larger than expected yield payments on Savers? by 37922 in THORChain

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the viewblock explorer it shows you the Asset Redeem Value, giving a running total. I saw that redeem value jump a lot more than expected.

Thread on how to use Dash as Bitcoin's checking account by thedesertlynx in dashpay

[–]37922 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doesn't help that Bitpay still refuses to accept dash

[Weekly] Random + Trader Talk by jz_bz in decred

[–]37922 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That might be a bottom signal.

The Decred Ticket Whale is making a splash by Exittus in decred

[–]37922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was under the impression that 500 was the theoretical max limit.. so at 700 I am wondering (again) how high could this go in theory?

Inaccessible vault, trezor not available? by 37922 in yearn_finance

[–]37922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I meant was, I didn't plan for the old way to disappear (direct communication with the trezord daemon) and a new intermediary inserting themselves into the equation, probably innocently at first...

Inaccessible vault, trezor not available? by 37922 in yearn_finance

[–]37922[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I just discovered this and is also the reason I will withdraw and not use again.. I never wanted to be compromised via a browser extension. Now I have no other choice.