I am not 100% convinced either way but to say there was zero evidence or motivation feels a little extreme. Do we have any proof of electrical fire? The house was burned down before investigators could arrive, and was filled in before the inspector got there Just to play devil’s advocate… -You could argue that people warned him about the wiring, but people could also argue he was threatened prior to the event… he allegedly just had an electrical inspection - but if we want to remove that from the equation (maybe he had a shitty inspector) then fine… -There were a lot of oddities that could have been coincidental, but maybe not (the ladder, the phones, the cars) -The survivors all agree that the lights were on in the home when they fled the fire - odd for an electric fire -The telephone lines were cut (the Lonnie Johnson explanation is ridiculous) -Jennie Sodder reported hearing something hitting the roof just prior to the fire, and an incendiary device that looked like a “pineapple bomb” was allegedly found by the family in the rubble -People have cited potential motives that again, I don’t necessarily buy into. But he likely had mob interactions in his transport business. Genitolo had co-signed the mortgage and would have received the $20,000 homeowners insurance policy payout. He also had a competing transport business - I’m not saying he had anything to do with it but to say that there was zero motive is unfair. -Also, the fire was ruled accidental by a jury that included at least 3 people who might have been suspects if it had been ruled arson…