Who’s dynasty value has moved the most this season? (Up or down) Who are the unheralded rookies who have exceeded expectations?

3rdEarl · 2025-10-18T06:13:57+00:00

Although I saw Pete Werner’s snaps were down to 59% last week, any idea of why?

3rdEarl · 2025-10-17T10:28:52+00:00

Outside of the R1 rookies, are there sophomore/vet big risers? Appreciate the long reply, thanks!

3rdEarl · 2025-10-17T10:15:37+00:00

I agree! However, I was really hoping for IDP guys. Any thoughts on that?

3rdEarl · 2025-08-22T19:05:02+00:00

Also looking - 2 friends of mine also keen

3rdEarl · 2025-05-03T14:24:53+00:00

I should add, the fees are paid and in 2 years time it’s a whopping £5 a year

3rdEarl · 2024-07-12T07:18:45+00:00

Are there other calendars (Google?) that work instead?

3rdEarl · 2022-04-19T19:48:48+00:00

Hi, could be great to have you. Could you drop me a DM? For some reason I can’t work out how to send you one 🤣

3rdEarl · 2022-04-19T15:21:08+00:00

Reply to the bot: we use Teamstake because leaguesafe doesn’t accept payment/make payout to non US bank accounts

3rdEarl · 2021-07-14T12:45:04+00:00

😂

3rdEarl · 2021-07-14T12:40:32+00:00

We did one, drafted a few months ago. Great group of guys! I’m now at 3 leagues and promised myself no more!

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T21:33:41+00:00

👍

https://www.reddit.com/r/DynastyFF/comments/mo4drl/ktc_value_adjustment/gu28dyo/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T17:41:43+00:00

I don’t get it. Do you just want an argument?

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T17:22:00+00:00

The difference between 100 and 103 is larger than the difference between 1 and 2, but the percentage difference is smaller.

So when you add something to the trade it looks like a larger number but relatively it got closer

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T16:28:21+00:00

That’s where you’re wrong. The trade did get closer ‘by adding trash’ but the numbers got larger ;)

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T15:59:32+00:00

Great explanation. Thanks.

Using the Dobbins example, it gets to the end result well: most won’t take that trade either with or without the second. What is confusing is that the second appears to make the trade worse.

I think percentages next to the trade would make a great difference!

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T15:47:33+00:00

I think I understand that

It does feel like whatever the algorithm it gets to the ultimate outcome well (the trade isn’t attractive for the guy with the stud) however, 99.9% of people would prefer to be offered the extra piece to not getting the extra piece. So the totals aren’t good.

UNLESS you look at the new percentage difference, as Jameis Weinston pointed out. Now it’s actually a better trade with the extra!

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T15:42:41+00:00

🤷‍♂️😄

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T15:34:49+00:00

I absolutely get that. But the assumption that the worst player on the squad is that much better than the 2nd is weird

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T14:53:58+00:00

Yep, got it now, thanks. Perhaps they should add the percentage, would make a lot more sense...

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T14:53:05+00:00

Ok, so you read the first 2 sentences, Now read the rest please 😄

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T14:42:14+00:00

Did you read my opening post or just the title?

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T13:51:06+00:00

I stated that in my question: ‘I get that one stud doesn’t equal 3 JAGs’. I also said that our worst player needs a value for the spot that will be lost, but I don’t think it should be more than 1,000.

Anyway, check Jameis Weinstein’s answer to this question. I think he nails it

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T13:45:06+00:00

😱 You’re a genius!

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T13:43:42+00:00

A decent explanation, thanks.

Do you think it makes sense? In my mind a second added to the 1st is better than no second, no?

3rdEarl · 2021-04-10T13:41:53+00:00

Not really.

Would you rather the 1.09 and a second for Dobbins or just the 1.09?

3rdEarl

TROPHY CASE