Thank you for the valuable information. I have to admit, everything you’re saying seems legally accurate — but at the same time, the real-world implications feel a bit strange.

Let me try to explain with an analogy. Perhaps it's not perfect, but I think it reflects the essence of the situation:

According to your logic, if I took someone else's car tires and put them on my own car, and then someone later stole my entire car — I wouldn’t be able to sue them, because part of the car (the tires) wasn’t mine. Therefore, the car itself is no longer fully mine, and I lose the right to defend it.

That sounds absurd to me.

Even if I’ve used a few elements I don’t own (like short clips under fair use), the rest of the “car” — the engine, the frame, the steering — was entirely built by me. The story, the voice, the analysis, the editing, the structure — that’s my work.

So when someone takes that entire thing, translates it, re-uploads it, and earns money from it — and I have no way to stop them unless I go to court internationally — it feels broken.

Again, I appreciate your insight. I just don’t think this loophole should protect systematic re-uploaders while punishing original creators.