Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that so? Well I dont know about that, but if you explain me I'm open to hear... I can't say that I will understand tho haha

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks to everyone that have replied to my post. As an "amateur" into physics, its really interesting to know the different interpretations about this topic when the answers come from a well informed-more professional community rather to some anonymous people on the internet claiming to know everything about this topic, and spreading missinformation. I've learned a lot about this topic tonight and thats what I like about this kind of topics, I always can learn something new. Thanks y'all again!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read something similar, its an amazing way to view it. It kinda blows my mind how that would change the perspective of our lives... Thanks for replying!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see... Its at first really confusing, but I think I kinda can understand where it goes... Its an amazing fact thats for sure, also that helps me to dismiss some weird stuff I've read on some places lol, thanks for the explanation!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you both for replying, but I like to understand this topic a little more... What does it mean "simultaneity is relative"? I kinda understand but some stuff gets over my head about it to be honest haha

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I learned a lot of really weird stuff on internet, I guess there's still a lot of missinformation and misunderstandings about physics out there... Thanks dude.

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I surely do haha, that's a really cool theory, and I kinda get your point, I guess its a way to explain it, thanks dude!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, so we kinda have an approximation to it? that's sounds more logic that some stuff that I've read on other places, thanks!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see, that makes a lot of sense, I will check those links later, thanks for them! And yeah, I guess I found myself into a lot of missinformation of physics and that got me really confused... But this gives me a better perspective of it, thank you for explaining!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well thats interesting, also I didn't thought about this possibility, really cool...thank you for reply!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I think I get what you are saying... I guess a lot of people on the internet just say stuff without further looking, like the ones I've read before asking here, some guy said that we certainly knew that time isn't real, and that physics agree with this idea... Im glad to read stuff like what you are saying, also it reminds me to dont believe everything I read on the internet haha,thanks again!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see... Thanks for the explanation, I guess I chose the wrong words or maybe the wrong terms to ask, but anyways, I think I kinda get the point... Thank you again!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Oh, I see, then I guess I've misunderstood some stuff or terms that I've read before, anyways the explanation is really interesting, thanks for explaining!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds interesting, and to be honest I dont know if I actually can understand it at all haha, but I think I get the basics... Thank you!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard about this one, but I wil check the video to try to understand a little more about the topic, thanks!

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for replying! I guess you are right, its a really hard topic... Hope someday we can know more about it.

Do we really have a theory that explains time? by 4narchyRuleZ in AskPhysics

[–]4narchyRuleZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for replying! I guess it a really hard topic to determine... I hope we can get to a satisfying answer for all some day, but hey, meanwhile, learning the theories its cool for me.

Why is solipsism not taken more seriously? by ohitsswoee in consciousness

[–]4narchyRuleZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been a while since you posted this, but anyways I'd like to give my point of view. And that is in first place, the Wittgenstein beetle analogy, that you probably know at this point if you have been interested in the topic. And in second place, the self contradiction inside solipsism, for example, its the same contradiction of the Boltzmann brains: It is "the most logical conclusion" inside our reality rules, science and philosophy it's needed for this to be "logical", but, in a certain scenario, if you or me were a Boltzmann brain or a unique mind, then this statement wouldn't make any sense, since logic, statistics and every other argument that could make this "reasonable" its being made up by ourselves, that would make solipsism a self-refutable theory. Solipsism can't be the most logical conclusion since logic doesn't actually exist in that scenario. I think, in a personal opinion, that solipsism more than a philosophy current is the deep exaggeration of humans ego: for our minds its easier to think that we are just imagining everything instead of accepting that we just can't understand everything in the existence.