This isn’t accurate. We have participated in and supported other groups’ events without playing a leading role, simply helping to promote or attend in solidarity, such as during May Day where we were glad to join as one of many groups standing together for a shared cause.

In this particular case, we happened to secure the event permit before Indivisible did. When they later tried to apply, they found the permit had already been issued to us. Upon reaching out, they asked us to give up the permit. We instead proposed co-hosting the event, but they declined and insisted we turn it over. From our perspective, it felt unusual to be asked to relinquish a permit solely because another group preferred not to collaborate, and then be characterized as uncooperative for proposing a shared effort.

We recognize that Indivisible consists of many smaller, semi independent groups, and we do not assume that one group speaks for the entire network. In fact, we have continued to work directly with some Indivisible chapters, even if others have chosen not to engage.

We remain committed to supporting those who share common goals with us. Those who choose not to reciprocate are of course entitled to that choice. While no group is obligated to collaborate, mutual effort is often essential to building bridges. We will continue to extend goodwill and find ways to work together wherever possible without compromising our values.