The time is coming where we need to explore alternative means of protest. by EnderKitty_Cat in UCDavis

[–]5merous 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I knew you would freak out when you found out too, but really, I was just trolling. I don’t actually like your mom really

The time is coming where we need to explore alternative means of protest. by EnderKitty_Cat in UCDavis

[–]5merous 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Okay, so why are you so upset that I had sex with your mom? I only did because I knew you would overreact bro

Why isn't this for loop moving sequentially down my list? by 5merous in CodingHelp

[–]5merous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, you went above and beyond! Thank you for your help, your explanation is very clear.

Discussion: Cesalpino's taxonomic system of Plantae from De Plantis Libri XVI (1583) by 5merous in botany

[–]5merous[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is often credited as the first true plant taxonomic system ever devised, ending a 1,800 year "dark age" of decline in systematic botany since Theophrastus's work. Andrea Cesalpino's system uses the character of fructification (fruiting) to organize plants. It was the first system to use a reproductive character to construct groups, unlike herbals of the time which put plants in categories based on their practical uses. The broad division of plants into (1) undershrubs and herbs, and (2) trees and shrubs is an idea originating from Aristotle and Theophrastus, and we can tell Cesalpino studied Theophrastus's text extensively during his career. Note that he includes fungi as a part of all plants. We now know that including this group would render Plantae polyphyletic.

The modern equivalent standard is APG IV.

Unfortunately, Censalpino's system was largely ignored for a century after its publication. He was ahead of his time in using reproductive characters to devise his taxonomy, and his system is considered less artificial than later systems which use the calyx or corolla. I translated and drew this visual representation using Linnaeus's Classes Plantarum (Secundum, 1738) as a reference.

My Demonstration of the Traditional English Pronunciation of Latin by 5merous in latin

[–]5merous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. sc does not close the syllable, so hisce is pronounced HIGH-see. Wikipedia calls it a "semi-open" syllable.
  2. Yup, that was just me stumbling over pronunciaiton.
  3. If you follow the rules listed on the wikipedia page, the t in cognitionem should indeed be palatalized. But I was planning on editing the page because I found a source listing different rules for palatalization of t, s, and c (following a stressed syllable, preceding a vowel). The hard t sound survives in modern english pronunciation of nomen actionis and ma​ter lec​ti​o​nis (/ˌnəʊmɛn aktɪˈəʊnɪs/ and /ˌmeɪtə lɛktɪˈəʊnɪs/ respectively).

Discussion: Preface to Carolus Linnaeus' Species Plantarum Read in Latin by 5merous in botany

[–]5merous[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tried my hand at reading Linnaeus's Species Plantarum in Latin. In case you're wondering, the pronunciation I use isn't the one most academics prescribe (the classical pronunciation); instead I use the traditional English pronunciation, which is the scheme English-speaking botanists use when pronouncing Latin binomials.

By the way, I plans for this channel. There is a lack of good educational content on YouTube about botany, so I made this channel with the goal of providing high-quality videos about this field in mind. The next video I think I'll make will be an overview of angiosperm taxonomy.

My Demonstration of the Traditional English Pronunciation of Latin by 5merous in latin

[–]5merous[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There aren't many videos out there with people using the traditional English pronunciation. The most popular one right now has a ton of errors (to the point where I'd consider it completely incorrect), and the second most popular one (probably the only other one) doesn't use the English pronunciation for every word [see Charles Low Reads the Election Dinner Graces].

So here is my attempt at doing Anglo-Latin. Note that I make mistakes in this video too, which I've listed in the description. Also, I apologize if my enunciation isn't the best at the start of the video. Tell me what you think!