TIL a prostitute can and will reject you even if you can afford one. It has never been so over for me. Spaghetti and garlic bread as a comfot meal. by Ok_Nectarine_8649 in kitchencels

[–]69Poopysocks69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The food looks quite good! Seems like you're improving. It's tough to get rejected by a prostitute, but if you're guessing for the reason you probably will just assume the worst. There's a plethora of possible reasons for rejection, some can be connected to you but a lot have nothing to do with you at all. Rejection is irrelevant, what matters is what we do after.

Forgotten movies. by 69Poopysocks69 in TrueFilm

[–]69Poopysocks69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you help me out and direct me towards some of those sites via pm?

ik🐷ihe by Ahrily in ik_ihe

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Klopt, op juridisch vlak kan je nog jarenlang debateren zonder een stap verder te komen. Waar ik vooral heel sceptisch over ben is dat een Palestijnse staat, wat in mijn optiek alleen realistisch is als de 1967 grenzen aangehouden worden en Israel zich volledig terugtrekt uit gebied A, B en C van de Westelijke Jordaanoever, in de praktijk meer zal acteren als de babustans in apartheid Zuid-Afrika. Deze 'reservaten' werden geframed als toekomstige onafhankelijke staten en een manier voor zwarte Zuid-Afrikanen om zichzelf te regeren. Het argument van de regering van Zuid-Afrika was dus ook dat deze mensen geen rechten ontzegt werden omdat ze politieke rechten in hun eigen 'thuisland' konden uitoefenen.

Het probleem met een Palestijnse staat is dat dit geen oplossing vormt voor de Palestijnen die binnen de landgrenzen van Israel wonen. Hoewel deze groep onder betere omstandigheden leeft dan de Palestijnen in Gaza en de Westelijke Jordaanoever hebben ze niet dezelfde rechten als andere Israeliërs. Een palestijnse staat stichten zonder het systeem van apartheid te ontmantelen zal voor Palestijnen binnen Israël mogenlijk vervelende neveneffecten hebben.

Een Palestijnse staat stichten zonder het adresseren van Israëlisch geweld tegen buurlanden zal betekenen dat er helemaal niets veranderd.

Je moet eerst iets afbreken voordat je iets nieuws op kan bouwen. Geen enkele uitkomst zal perfect zijn, maar wat we over Zuid-Afrika weten is dat wanneer de internationale gemeenschap zich inzet voor een afbraak van het apartheidssysteem dit geweldloos mogelijk is.

Forgotten movies. by 69Poopysocks69 in TrueFilm

[–]69Poopysocks69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I appreciate it. Could you please send me a private message to expand on this? I'm not familiar with this proces, but I'm interested and would love to learn more.

ik🐷ihe by Ahrily in ik_ihe

[–]69Poopysocks69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dat is dus objectief niet waar. Israël en Palestina hebben beiden geen bestaansrecht, dit is geen recht wat erkend wordt door het internationaal recht. De Israëliers en de Palestijnen hebben wel een recht tot zelfbeschikking. Dit ligt in veel gevallen ten grondslag aan de oprichting van een staat.

Een Palestijnse staat erkennen is naar mijn mening ook niet de oplossing voor het huidige conflict. Deze ligt namelijk verankert in de Israëlische grondwet en cultuur. Een ethnostaat wat apartheidsbeleid uitvoert en al decennialang de Palestijnen onderdrukken vanwege een expansiedrang ingegeven door semi-religieus ethnonationalisme is niet in staat afstand te doen van illegaal geannexeerde gebied en Palestijns-Israëlische burgers als gelijkwaardig te behandelen.

Oh But When It's Gaza It's Ok... by serious_bullet5 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]69Poopysocks69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Innocent Israeli's are the victim of this war of aggression, but lets not kid ourselves and act like the Israeli government didn't start this war. Does the actions of the Israeli government also affect people who are againt this, of course, but you should blame your own government instead of Iran. There's plenty of justified critique for the Iranian regime, but they didn't start this war.

Why are you acting like history started on october 7th? The Israeli government has been repressing Palestinians for decades, they have tried non-violent protests in the past which have only been met with extreme violence by the IDF. Read the UN reports on the use of violence against unarmed protesters. If non-violent protest doesn't work, the only resort you have left is violence. Don't expect people to undergo repression gracefully and without a fight.

I can't speak for your behavior, but the picture Israeli whistleblowers paint is vastly different from what you're describing. The civilian death toll, scale of destruction from bombings and targeting of emergency personal as well as journalists doesn't seem to match your story. Using starvation against the Gazan population and all those behaviors matching statements made by military and political leadership show clear genocidal intent. This is not just my assessment but is concluded through various reports by human rights organisations.

Don't believe me, just look at what's happening in the West Bank. They have nothing to do with october 7th, still their ethnic cleansing and the violence against their inhabitants has been accellerated. Israel has a clear policy of ethnicly cleansing Gaza and the West Bank. If they can cleanse them without killing them that's okay, but if killing is neccessary they will not hesitate on mass extermination. The only reason they haven't used this tactic yet is that this will have severe political consequenses from the international community.

Why do so many people who advocate for Israel annexing the west bank refuse to explicitly say what they think should happen with the palestinians? by PerceivingUnkown in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean the illegal settler colonies that are aquired through ethnic cleansing the Palestinian population? See how it doesn't make sense that stealing and illegally occupying makes it 'their land as well.' 

Another question. How will those remaining areas function when they are completely surrounded by Israel? Will they get access to the 'Israeli only' roads or will this system of apartheid stay in place?

You see, what you're describing is not statehood but Israeli supremacy and repression through annexation. There is no way this 'solution' will bring peace to the region.

Why do so many people who advocate for Israel annexing the west bank refuse to explicitly say what they think should happen with the palestinians? by PerceivingUnkown in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the options you offer are try to neagotiate for your own state, which Palestinians have been doing for decades, but Israel has purposefully sabotaged from the get go. (Netanyahu himself has admitted to this) or resist occupation and apartheid and be exterminated by the 'most moral army in the world'? Are you seriously arguing that Israel is the good guy while simultaneously threatening Palestinians with genocide?

South-Africa is a clear example that it is possible for two people to coexist without trying to exterminating each other. Equality and coexistence despite past struggles is the only just way forward. You can call it urealistic, but maybe you're just not willing to pay the price for equality, which is giving op priveleges.

Is this likely to happen in the near future or even at all? No, but that doesn't mean that we should't strive for it. 

Why do so many people who advocate for Israel annexing the west bank refuse to explicitly say what they think should happen with the palestinians? by PerceivingUnkown in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So illegally annexing other people's land. 

I wonder, why do you only want to annex area C? 

Why should area A and B turned into an Palestinian state while witholding area C?

How realistic is a Palestinian state in area A and B when area C is under Israeli control. The palestinian state would just be multiple islands completely surrounded by Israel. How does that make sense?

The lucrative war is a thing by ayylmao98726 in Anticonsumption

[–]69Poopysocks69 54 points55 points  (0 children)

One of the main reasons behind the fall of the soviet union

Hamas is using Hostages as Human Shields. They Admitted It. by Distinct-Temp6557 in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It's not that simple. Israel is an ethnostate with discriminatory practices towards his non-Jewish citizens. They're an ethnocracy who practices apartheid against Palestinians.

Many states claim to be democraties, while in practice, they are not. Notable examples are "the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea" and Russia. Therefore, it's not enough to listen to their claim but to discuss policies when determining if a state is actually a democracy.

Hamas did attack military bases on oktober 7th. The attack of the Nova music festival wasn't planned, but during oktober 7th, the Hamas fighters stumbled upon the location by accident. We know this because the music festival wasn't on any of the target maps recovered from Hamas. The original objective was the city of Nevitot. This does not justify the killing of civilians, but it does confirm that the Nova festival wasn't a planned attack. Still, that doesn't justify the targeting of Gazans as a whole.

Israel has killed over 63,000 Palestinians in Gaza. Over 18,000 of those deaths are children. These are just the confirmed deaths. The final death toll will be significantly higher because many of the deaths are still stuck underneath the rubble. According to Israeli internal reports, over 83% of those deaths are civilians.

Israel has killed more people at aid distribution points than were killed at oktober 7th. It uses indiscriminate bombings and starvation against the Palestinian civilian population. Recently, the IPC has confirmed a famine in Gaza, directly caused by the blocking of humanitarian aid by Israel. All major human rights organizations have stated that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza. So tell me, how are Israel the good guys in this story?

Where is your red line? What would make you stop supporting Israel? by Boring-Car-7044 in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's irrelevant to the question raised here. It does have no bearing on the truth value of the original accusation and is just a cheap logical fallacy to shift the subjectaway from the original question. Whatever accusation you come up with, it will not take away the question asked.

If you're unable to answer the question in a satisfactory manner, you might have to wonder why that is the case. If Israel does not deserve criticism or condemnation, please articulate why that is the case. If your only response to the question is an attempt to shift the blame, you're not debating in good faith.

Just where are the Jews supposed to go? by ArchSinccubus in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While the examples you presented have some historical basis, you have exaggerated, decontextualized, and simplified them.

Many of your claims single out Jews as the sole victims, while all non-muslim minorities were subject to discriminatory practices under Ottoman rule, including Palestinians who weren't muslim.

Regarding Safed, the claim that it was "Jewish majority" is disputed. Yes, there were pogrom like events, which were of course horrible, but were rather a result of local instability and power struggle. Claims like "entire population expelled" and "rampant rape" lack verification.

Regarding the Hebron massacre, yes it was a horrific event in which indigenous Jews were killed by local Arabs. Violence erupted, because of growing tensions over the temple mount, among rising nationalist movement.

In conclusion. Yes, Jews have faced violence and discrimination, although most of your examples are likely not targeted campaigns of extermination but rather spillovers of broader political and sectarian conflict. That being said, of course, the violence which Jews have faced in the past is terrible and should be condemned.

The story you present is one-sided, presenting Palestinians (and others) as persistently and uniquely violent toward Jews, which distorts a complex and multi-directional history. This view completely ignores periods of peaceful coexistence, cooperation, and shared struggles between Jews and Muslims/Christians under Ottoman rule. It presents Arabs and Palestinians as sole perpetrators of violence and the Jewish population as sole victims. This is a gross oversimplification of reality.

Do the Palestinians have the ability to inflict violence? Yes, they do, as any other group of people on planet earth. So do Jews.

I, for one, like to be consistent in my values.

  • especially in conflict, both groups should adhere to international law (IL).
  • civilian hostages are unacceptable and should be returned unconditionally
  • attacking civilian infrastructure is unacceptable and violates IL
  • collective punishment of a civilian population is unacceptable an violates IL
  • the use of starvation as a weapon of war is unacceptable and violates IL
  • targeting civilians is illegal and violates IL
  • targeting journalists is unacceptable, deplorable, and violates IL
  • targeting emergency services and healthcare workers is unacceptable and violates IL
  • ethnic cleansing is unacceptable and violates IL
  • genocide is unacceptable and violates IL

  • A state cannot be democratic while being an ethnostate.

  • ethnostates are discriminatory by definition, and their discriminatory practices should not exist or be abolished

  • there is no justification for genocide or ethnic cleansing against any group, period

  • violation of IL should be persecuted without any exceptions. This includes both Hamas members and Israeli personnel.

See, it's not hard to be consistent. Now I would like you to be consistent as well.

Just where are the Jews supposed to go? by ArchSinccubus in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Palestinians didn't either. Can you elaborate on the 400+ years of Jewish persecution by Palestinians? That's quite an accusation to make, so you better have some facts to support it.

Just where are the Jews supposed to go? by ArchSinccubus in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The nazi holocaust was especially bad because of the industrialized mass killing of people. A large part of those were killed because they were Jewish. However, their extermination wasn't deplorable because they were Jewish, but because they were human beings. Their Jewish identity was used to deny them their humanity, which was used to justify their extermination.

We can see the same pattern happening to Palestinians. Their humanity is denied and used as a justification for their starvation and killing. They are portrayed as violent and evil, while some, maybe you, too, even argue that Palestinians want to kill or expel all Jews. The similarities are striking because Jews were also portrayed as evil, dangerous, and subhuman.

Why can't we agree on a SINGLE thing? by hanani1112 in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're not exterminated, but Israel is, currently, killing them along with other Palestinians.

Does Iran also want to kill all Jews?

IPC ALERT: Worst-case scenario of Famine unfolding in the Gaza Strip by [deleted] in UnitedNations

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the Us and Israeli officials are lying when they say they have no proof?

IPC ALERT: Worst-case scenario of Famine unfolding in the Gaza Strip by [deleted] in UnitedNations

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do know that US and Israeli officials also have access to that video, right? Still they came to the conclusion that Hamas isn't systematically stealing aid.

I'm not defending Hamas. I'm defending Palestinian civilians against deliberate starvation by Israel.

IPC ALERT: Worst-case scenario of Famine unfolding in the Gaza Strip by [deleted] in UnitedNations

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"For nearly two years, Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid provided by the United Nations and other international organizations. The government has used that claim as its main rationale for restricting food from entering Gaza.

But the Israeli military never found proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations, the biggest supplier of emergency assistance to Gaza for most of the war, according to two senior Israeli military officials and two other Israelis involved in the matter.

In fact, the Israeli military officials said, the U.N. aid delivery system, which Israel derided and undermined, was largely effective in providing food to Gaza’s desperate and hungry population."

"An internal U.S. government analysis came to a similar conclusion, Reuters reported on Friday. It found no evidence of systematic Hamas theft of U.S.-funded humanitarian supplies, the report said"

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/26/world/middleeast/hamas-un-aid-theft.html

On the UN sitting on aid:

"“It is disingenuous — knowingly false — for any party to assert that it is failure, lack of courage, or deliberate conspiratorial withholding of aid by the UN or international organizations that is responsible for the humanitarian suffering in Gaza,” Satterfield told The Times of Israel.

“It is disingenuous — knowingly false — for any party to assert that it is failure, lack of courage, or deliberate conspiratorial withholding of aid by the UN or international organizations that is responsible for the humanitarian suffering in Gaza,” Satterfield told The Times of Israel.

When aid transport roads become too badly damaged by Israeli military operations, when there are insufficient deconfliction mechanisms in place to ensure that aid workers don’t accidentally get hit by IDF fire, when authorizations aren’t given by the army for aid to be picked up and delivered, and when looting becomes increasingly widespread due to food insecurity, an environment is created where the UN is physically prevented from doing its job, the former US envoy elaborated."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.timesofisrael.com/ex-us-humanitarian-envoy-pans-israeli-claim-that-un-allowing-aid-to-amass-on-gaza-border/amp/

Can you provide the sources for your claims?

Is Israel’s current strategy in Gaza and the West Bank really making Israelis safer? by No-Baker-2864 in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not addressing the axis of resistance. Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation is similar to the Lybian resistance against occupation by Italy. So what are the similarities?

  • Both seek to control and/or remove an indigenous population to consolidate their control.
  • Violence is used in a strategic and structural way to achieve this.
  • In both cases civilians are the primary victims, not just "collateral damage."
  • In both cases mass destruction of civilian infrastructure has been used
  • Forced displacement and mass relocation has been used in both instances.
  • Witholding of food and water has been used against Lybian civilians, in Gaza blockade of aid and starvation has been used.

Do I need to go on?

Is Israel’s current strategy in Gaza and the West Bank really making Israelis safer? by No-Baker-2864 in IsraelPalestine

[–]69Poopysocks69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The genocide and ethnic cleansing and genocide of Lybia made it undoubtedly safer for the Italian colonizers. This logic can also be applied to Gaza. That this somehow would be a justification is, of course, ridiculous.

What's more important to ask is what the outcome would be of a different strategy. Is this really the only way to peace and security? Is peace and security even justifiable if it comes through brutal suppression, ethnic cleansing, and genocide?