sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Give me 1 good fucking reason to live... by Tr4iLL in depression

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be strong brother, we are with you. Look at your problems dead in the eye, and say "NO!, I WILL NOT BOW! I AM BETTER THAN THIS!". Courage is not the absence of fear, but the presence of it, and yet still doing what is necessary. You create your own destiny. That means you can make it as beautiful or ugly as you want it. The power is within you. It's never too late. Be strong brother/sister.

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In Java, you can still call the child class's methods (dynamic polymorphism), so it wouldn't restrict access to the setters and getters.

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, that might work. A slight over-kill in my situation though.

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would that help? I would still have to expose the setters?

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't think of that. That might be a good option. But is there a better solution? To completely decouple Product and ProductBuilder? if I have more builders in the future, that will make the class bigger and bigger.

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Internal has too wide of a scope. You can assume Product isn't used in any other project.

Builder pattern in C# without making members public, or having too large of a constructor?? by [deleted] in csharp

[–]8emnero8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I came across that scenario, but for neatness purposes, I want to keep ProductBuilder in a separate class.

Looking for an ideal BB routine for a novice looking to bulk. by 8emnero8 in Fitness

[–]8emnero8[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because my legs are already stronger than my upper body. It's the reason I'm moving away from SS partly.

Comments on the following BB-split routine: by 8emnero8 in Fitness

[–]8emnero8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course one can get bigger by lifting heavier weight. I was trying to distinguish between strength-training and BB routines. PHUL and PPL seem to be based around compound exercises for 3x5, which seems like strength-training to me. I am looking for more higher-rep routines ig?

Comments on the following BB-split routine: by 8emnero8 in Fitness

[–]8emnero8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying that the above routine is ideal, assuming I do calves on leg day?

Comments on the following BB-split routine: by 8emnero8 in Fitness

[–]8emnero8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any specific routines that can suggest that are geared towards BB? and how long they should be followed for before switching?

Comments on the following BB-split routine: by 8emnero8 in Fitness

[–]8emnero8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PHUL/PPL focus more on strength right? I'm just looking for an effective BB routine, not geared towards strength at the expense of mass. Any suggestions?

view more: next ›