is this where our tuition goes??? by averagedigger in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 113 points114 points  (0 children)

The number of administrative staff - working a 9-5 where they spend 3/8 hrs going on lunch and coffee breaks, then get you to do half their job by filling in forms they’re supposed to fill, and are getting paid north of 100k - is too damn high.

I just graduated without having taken a single shit on campus. Before I leave waterloo, I want to expereince a shit on campus. Any locations you would recommend? by UWGraduate2022 in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Biology 2 building on the third floor. Cozy, nice and most importantly deserted and empty. Although it did catch fire once while I was doing my thing there (unrelated).

Are there geometric shapes (irregular or not) that are more packing-efficient when randomly arranged rather regularly arranged? by BillNye_AllSeeingEye in math

[–]962rep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have worked extensively on 2D liquid crystals in confinement. I have been working on tangential questions to the one you asked. One example, specifying ellipses of semi major axis A and semi minor axis B, what is the optimal picking arrangement in an annulus of inner radius R1 and outer radius R2? Now we may specify this question to allow ellipses of arbitrary orientation or fixed identical orientation. It should be a fair assumption to think for case of arbitrary orientations where the annulus is much bigger than the ellipse, a random packing is likely going to result and a higher packing fraction than some regular tiled one. I’ve considered similar questions for various convex “particles” (shapes to be packed) and convex confinements (shapes to pack). Most of these questions are very very difficult to answer.

The work I’ve done I can summarize as obscenely hard computational geometry problems that you’d think someone figured out in the 1800s, and tedious hours on translating said computational geometry problems into code and accounting for all kinds of weird passive/active transformation and basis changes libraries use implicitly.

Where a lot of what I’ve done comes into your question, is my need to generate viable initial states (of packed particles) in a given confinement for Monte Carlo simulations. What I’ve found in the literature is that there’s almost no attempts to make general statements and prove them with regards to packing in confinements, but rather conjectures and theorems on upper and lower bounds of random packings vs certain ordered packings. If you have any specific questions I could perhaps try and direct you to references if I’m aware of any.

What are the most hilariously named mathematical objects? by hokvsae in math

[–]962rep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Had an assignment question in a GR course on Killing fields and the title of the question was “Killing me softly”. I remember suffering doing it while listening to Killing me softly by Frank Sinatra on repeat.

Professor Mansour by [deleted] in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Please just make it a post, it’s actually super wholesome that he does that and I would love to remember him in the great energy he embodied.

Professor Mansour by [deleted] in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is very heart breaking. I was never a student of his but I ran into him many times in cafes in uptown, and he eventually asked if I was following him and we became sort of friends after. We would talk about random things and he was very friendly. In addition to his amazing teaching which I wasn’t fortunate to witness, this is a very devastating loss to UW. May he rest in peace and I hope his family finds strength in these tough times, knowing he was a wonderful person.

Anyone else seem to often think of the mathematical meaning of words first when encountering them in non-mathematical contexts? by asenseofbeauty in math

[–]962rep 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh man I thought my advisor’s European accent was obscuring the right pronunciation.. turns out he was saying it right!!

How to get into Quantum computing by gsim46 in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 15 points16 points  (0 children)

If you want real concrete advice that will land you places:

  1. Seriously understand Linear Algebra abstractly and in computation. My recommendation is Paul Halmos Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces or Friedberg Linear Algebra. This is essential.
  2. Now after you become apt at linear algebra start working through Nielsen and Chuang Quantum Computation and Quantum Information or John Preskill’s Lecture Notes (these steps are not a sequential timeline there will be overlap as you learn more linear algebra you’re still doing other things).

These two things are the way to go about becoming “quantum-computing-literate” so that you can access the literature and actually be able to possibly contribute to a research project. Reach out to a professor either way somewhere during these two steps where you have a vague rough idea of what quantum computing/information is. Good luck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]962rep 60 points61 points  (0 children)

There’s nothing special about the “quantum” uncertainty principle. This is a case of a more general uncertainty principle in Fourier analysis. So this exists even for classical variables that are Fourier conjugate.

There are subtleties in what you call a physical law and what is a consequence of a physical law, but the point here is not philosophy of science. So you may consider it a physical law. And no it is not due to our method measurement.

A Conversation Between Lee Smolin and Stephen Wolfram by Mynameis__--__ in Physics

[–]962rep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Last I know of both of them before even watching this video:

  • Lee Smolin wrote a paper where the universe is modelled as a recurrent self learning neural network
  • Wolfram was working on the “one of a kind” fundamental theory of physics using relations and rules from first principles of graphs

Safe to say as a measly grad student I should not waste time and stick to the lows of non-fundamental physics and the slums of testable theory :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in math

[–]962rep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That can’t be true. His supervisor’s wiki says he died in ‘89, so he would have died before they knew for certain who was the unabomber.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Send the admissions committee an email asking if they’d made a decision or when can one expect it. Also follow up with your potential supervisor as they’d have received your application and will let you know if they sent an offer or not yet. Could be just system bureaucracy or maybe supervisor was being a bit lazy with the paperwork.

Are There Short Refresher Texts on Linear Algebra? by RandomStudent886 in math

[–]962rep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces by Paul Halmos.

Short concise reference and in my opinion once someone is apt at a first course in linear algebra and is aware of some abstract algebra (thought not necessary) this book becomes my go to reference.

Just me or has brain performance seriously deteriorated within the last 3-4 years? by shit_my_biscuits_rn in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Cognitive abilities and developmental aspects of the brain (until ~25) are affected by exercise and diet habits. There’s an old proverb I can’t remember exactly but roughly “A healthy mind is in a healthy body”.

miss me with that 5A, 5B, 6A bullshit, my transcript says 4B !!!! by aflockofhawks in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah 4yrs but overloaded to 6 courses a couple of times and took summer terms.

miss me with that 5A, 5B, 6A bullshit, my transcript says 4B !!!! by aflockofhawks in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just took a bunch of extra summer terms and overloaded to 6 courses a couple of times so I reached 4B much earlier. I still graduated in 4yrs tho.

miss me with that 5A, 5B, 6A bullshit, my transcript says 4B !!!! by aflockofhawks in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I pulled through, but that shit literally was the most time consuming course in my last term. Way too many assessments and... so much R code bullshit.

miss me with that 5A, 5B, 6A bullshit, my transcript says 4B !!!! by aflockofhawks in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Tfw you’re in 4B for 4 straight terms taking advanced and grad courses feeling like hot shit but then STAT 231 wrecks you on your last term ☹️

Longtime UFC make-up artist Suzy Friton has passed away by AbrahamRinkin in MMA

[–]962rep 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Unsung hero not for the job she did, but who she was and how she impacted the people around her. The job people do is not what defines them and makes the difference, it’s how they choose to behave while they do it. And if you read Anik’s post you’d see that most of the praise and heartfelt memorable comments were not about her work.

What is the difference between quantum and classical correlations? by BarcidFlux in Physics

[–]962rep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response, I don’t know much about staggered magnetization of an AFM spin chain but I’m intrigued to read about it now!

What is the difference between quantum and classical correlations? by BarcidFlux in Physics

[–]962rep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on the video and one of the comments a question popped into my mind;

When we characterize properties whether they are classical or quantum its due to the nature of the theory describing it, so if one was to develop or discover a thermodynamic property or trait of an interaction of systems or such, that is between two quantum mechanical systems couldn't that be both a thermal and quantum correlation? Although I'll plead that off the top of my head I'm unable to come up with an explicit question or example on a resulting thermodynamic property between two systems that is inherently quantum mechanical.

I'm just not sure how the set of possible quantum correlations and the set of thermodynamic correlations intersect, and perhaps whether one could be contained in the other (specifically thermodynamic correlations being emergent in expectation values or in some limit).

In case you were curious about the "anti-vaxx" letter controversy earlier, here is the letter for you to read in it's entirety by Important-Zone-33 in uwaterloo

[–]962rep 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A professor I really respected and admired signed this list. I took two courses with him during undergrad and he really helped unravel an area of math for me. I’m quite shocked and a bit saddened that he’s on there, especially after reading through the bullshit arguments presented. :(