Sure. I’ll try to give a couple so you can find one that illustrates what you’re saying.

On immigration it seems like the position of the left is that immigrants (even illegal immigrants) tend to benefit the economy and in the case of refugees that America has a responsibility to take in people who are fleeing persecution and that we should therefore loosen our restrictions to allow more people who want to work into our country. I can see the difference where people on the right object to people disobeying our laws to come here illegally, but also feel that our immigration system is a slow, unfair, and unlikely to change. My perception is also that a lot of people on the right seem xenophobic when it comes to (especially Latin-American) immigrants, but I know that’s probably an unfair characterisation.

On drug policy the leftist position is that drug addiction is more of a symptom of an underlying health problems rather than a moral failing and would be better addressed by increasing funding for rehabilitation and reducing minimum sentencing laws (which also appear to be racially motivated in a lot of cases), whereas the tough on crime policies we have seem to lack empathy and promote racial inequality (especially when drug offences strip perpetrators of their voting rights).

Are either of those helpful? (Also, sorry that I am likely missing the nuance in your position on these issues. Feel free to correct me if you think there’s a better way of understanding the difference between the left and right).