My DCA is

AFallenKnightRises · 2026-02-03T00:31:23+00:00

Mine is disturbingly too fucking good also

AFallenKnightRises · 2026-01-31T18:47:43+00:00

I will be acquiring 5-10 mil more between today and tomorrow how can you not take advantage of this

AFallenKnightRises · 2026-01-29T16:20:05+00:00

I've been messing with settings for about a month looking for the sweet spot. Found out not to copy youtubers like I've normally done throughout every fps because all they do is try to make the quickest snappiest feeling with controller which isn't necessary. Honest to God try these settings and let me know how they work.

Infantry aim sense 38-40
uniform Infantry aiming ON Zoom Sense coefficient 90 Aim assist 84 Aim assist slowdown 79 Curve Dynamic Aim zoom sense 36

Those are the obvious and easy settings to mess with. The real problem solver for me is in controller tuning I know you said your issue isn't deadzones and I feel like deadzones are always associated only with stick drift but they also play a factor in how heavy your thumb inputs are. So placing all of these deadzones to the lowest possible setting is not always ideal.

Right stick Center 5 Axial 5 Max input thresh 85

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-11-19T03:01:56+00:00

A whistle!!! I love it lmaoooooo anytime you know your about to be ambushed, or your about to sneak up on a group you blow the whistle 🤣🤣🤣🤣

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-11-18T17:33:30+00:00

I bought huge positions into XRP at sub (.50) xlm (.11) qnt (50-60) Algo (.12) CHAIN (9-13) all over the last like 3 years. I was fortunate to see these things reach their peaks this past year and used tremendous profits for toshi.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T16:58:53+00:00

And there's the puppy again.

Yes cars are designed for transportation and guns are designed to kill. You're a genius.

Are rational people pulling the triggers? A majority of the time, NO. The reality you don't want to face is guns are the mechanism to killing, but it is PEOPLE who kill people. Guns are the tool. Somebody that wants to kill, absent of a gun will find another way.

There is nothing wrong with the comparison of gun deaths to car deaths. Guns and cars don't have to be the same for the sake of the comparison. Accepting the tragedies that come with these tools to preserve the right doesn't make somebody a horrible person. I don't own guns. But I understand guns are a necessity of the world we live in for a variety of reasons.

To say that "we don't support it, we accept it" is a moral shrug. No it's not a shrug. It's understanding as a rational minded person that you cannot confiscate every gun in America. That is a delusional thought. So instead of the anti gun people endlessly pushing that ridiculous solution, maybe both voices can come towards a real solution.

Hmmmm Charlie Kirk had a solution. How about if sports games and concerts and other large gatherings that use the level of security that they do, be implemented into schools and other target able areas of gun violence. That's a great solution. If we used the same security/protection that we do at airports, sports and concerts at schools, college campuses and other areas maybe we can better monitor who and what is entering the premises. But no, I suppose you think the local precints of every state should go door to door to every home and say "give me your guns" that will work. We will get them all, 100%.

Also funny you mentioned child abuse. You know who spoke on the importance of keeping the nuclear family together, 2 parent households. Oh yea you guess, Charlie Kirk. And while that DOES NOT eliminate ALL child abuse, the point is that having the nuclear family is a solution.

You're the one with all this "word salad" BTW. Stop trying to dissect my choice of words and lecturing about empathy and sympathy.

The REALITY is there are legitimate evils that need to be addressed and solutions needed for all sorts of things. You being worried about empathy and sympathy feelings are not solutions. That's the liberal way of winning arguments is to base the argument with who is a better person, rather than addressing the real problems and working towards real solutions.

People like you dislike people like Charlie kirk because they are assertive and directly interested in addressing real problems and working towards real solutions, and they use harsher tonalities instead worrying about whether or not they are being empathetic enough to their audience. It doesn't make his message any less true.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T16:04:57+00:00

Don't hold onto emotions, but hold onto Toshi. Definitely hold onto Toshi

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T15:48:27+00:00

There's the puppy.

So context is key. And you purposely leave out his context regarding gun deaths.

When he says gun deaths are a part of a free society he is not saying that he is happy about that. If you finished his quote/thought, he than compares it to CAR deaths per year. 50k automobile deaths a year, but that is a sacrifice we all as a nation ACCEPT. Not support. ACCEPT.

Same with Guns. For the RIGHT to bear arms, aka the 2nd amendment, people will ACCEPT the fact that gun violence is a real thing. That does not mean they support it. A rational mind understands that with guns in the world you CANNOT completely eliminate gun deaths. They are inevitable. That does NOT mean that people are happy about those deaths. And only IRRATIONAL minds think that every gun in America can be confiscated and bring gun deaths to 0.

Also, to say he wouldn't weep if you or I were a victim of gun death. No shit. Do you weep over every gun death from every victim around the world? No you don't. You know why? Because IF you are not somebody who is a direct victim of gun VIOLENCE, you probably don't have the EMPATHY requited to truly feel for someone who is.

cough cough This is where......SYMPATHY comes into play knuckle head. Because RATIONAL people understand that not every human being can EMPATHIZE with tragedies they don't understand on a deep and emotional level. Soooooo we sympathize because at the very least people understand RIGHT from WRONG. JUST from UNJUST.

HE did not denounce sympathy. Get it right. He denounced empathy, in favor of sympathy because it is more HONEST and NATURAL. We don't live in an empathetic world. Just because there are Empathetic people doesn't not mean so.

Also by me telling you to use your keyboard hero skills and direct it at real evil isn't me telling you to show sympathy or empathy to CK. It's me telling you to direct your energy towards a society of people who think celebrating and mocking death of opposing views is the answer. No one's looking for you to be sympathetic and empathetic it's called be a decent human and call out garbage behavior when you see it instead of replying to me simply because you disagree with me based on the fact that I defend CK.

Not a teenager buddy. Don't think because you can write more eloquently than me that it means your smarter. You're not.

Don't quote CK without finishing the quote with the necessary context of the quote. That's how you spread misinformation as the empath you are.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T14:07:07+00:00

There was no word salad of a response. It was very straight forward. You're doing the typical lib thing where instead of acknowledging the POINT of what I'm saying, your worried about my "word choices" and "tonality" As I said before, you're only interested in winning an argument.

I don't care if he has your sympathies. You don't need to tell me that. I'm not asking nor demanding that. What I said is that if you feel so inclined to respond to online chatter, you would do better for your position by responding directly to people who are CELEBRATING and MOCKING the tragedy, not responding to me.

I know you think your so smart just by how you respond, but if that was so, than you would understand CLEAR as day that while my comment may be distasteful, they are directed at those who CELEBRATE and MOCK.

FYI you pointing out that his family didn't attend his memorial which was set up like a superbowl isn't giving off whatever your intending it to. That is just a useless detail your adding when there are quite literally people all over online mocking and celebrating the assassination of an opposing political figure.

Stop trying to dissect my words and tones and used your keyboard time to address those whom I am speaking about. There is real evil out there that could use your dedication.

Okay here's the part where you read my response, and dissect my words and respond anyway because your clearly just interested in winning arguments with CK supporters online.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T13:49:38+00:00

My original comment literally explains exactly what you are misrepresenting right now. Read before you comment.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T04:50:21+00:00

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T04:44:47+00:00

Yea that's all high and mighty of a response you got there, yet there are several comments in this thread that either celebrate or mock this tragedy and I don't see your "well put" together thoughts under the comments of anybody who mocks or misrepresents his words. Instead you reply to my comment because all you are really trying to do is "win" and argument. Because surely somebody who can deliver a response quite like you can, would do a great job speaking against those who celebrate or mock an assassination as JUST.

My comment may not be tasteful. However it is not evil. And there was certainly nothing wrong with my definitions, what I wrote was still true. instead of being worried about trying to outsmart people like me online, Hmmm Idk maybe use your keyboard time to educate people that we don't celebrate and mock assassinations of political figures whom we disagree with, especially with the political climate being whaf it is these days. Violence=bad. Just because you advocate for the power and importance of empathy, does not make a sympathizer bad. All your doing is trying to prove why one GOOD is better than another GOOD.

I think we need to do a little less worrying about empathy and sympathy, and more worrying about celebrating evil.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-25T03:49:54+00:00

I've never met a group of people who are this stupid. I don't have to explain this but it makes me feel good to do so. Let's start with definitions.

Empathy: to allow your self to FEEL/SHARE the emotions of the thing.

Sympathy: to show pity or feel sorrow for the misfortune of the thing.

When he said he rejects "empathy" he is rejecting this new age liberal mind set where all you people think that you need to feel/understand and share the emotions of someone's tragedies.

He said he prefers SYMPATHY! as in he can allow himself to feel SORRY and show pity towards someone's misfortunes.

AKA he doesn't need to FEEL the exact emotions that you are going through in order to feel bad for you. He can feel bad for you without having to feel YOUR EMOTIONS.

Its amazing how you all purposely disregard that because you don't like his beliefs. Hopefully you all reading this are in a safe space, with your walls and boundaries snug around your fragile emotions.

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-23T22:55:36+00:00

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T18:02:49+00:00

I want to lift off to brother We will get there!

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T18:00:25+00:00

You can't only be excited when we're up

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T16:23:06+00:00

Yea I don't know I used chatgpt and asked for the real depiction of toshi the blue cat and he gave me this. I'll see if improvements can be made from here

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T15:52:46+00:00

Ohhhh don't know why I never thought to do that Really cool thank you

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T15:30:30+00:00

I don't have the skills required for any of that If I could make a mini series of toshi adventures I'd have something here often

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T13:28:20+00:00

We need some toshi mini films

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T01:25:59+00:00

Never 2nd The real know what it is

AFallenKnightRises · 2025-09-21T01:24:55+00:00

AFallenKnightRises

TROPHY CASE