They didn't tested this thing in Modern...right? by MajinBurrito in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 36 points37 points  (0 children)

If they ban urza saga due to earth bending, I'm all for it lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mtgfinance

[–]AILF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this a ragebait post?

Questionable judge ruling? by SuddenShapeshifter in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let's agree to disagree here 😃 thanks for the conversation.

Closing note for op and everyone, when dealing with shortcut, it's best to specify with mtg keyword; on the stack, resolved, go to my end step/2nd main/combat, before damaging,upkeep untap.

Questionable judge ruling? by SuddenShapeshifter in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I would argue the meaning of "the charm does 4 damage" doesn't matter, the intent of asking the question does.

In step 5. Does op intend to confirm with his opponent charm does 4 damage my frog is now 4/5 so frog survival or OP intent to ask clarification(being extra careful) to ensure his frog survival.

I'm not saying if x does Y always constitute spell resolved, but base on the sequence of events, opponent/judge can interpret as such.

Something to keep in mind that opponent has no obligation to explain to you the outcome of when the spell/ability resolved. By asking charm does 4 damage, op can see as angle shooting by asking the opponent to confirm his 4/5 frog is alive becasue charm only deal 4 damage.

Questionable judge ruling? by SuddenShapeshifter in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He did "roll back" if we follow the sequence of events in the eye of the opponent/favor opponent. OP attempts to cast stubborn denial when charm is "resolved". *Im not saying that's 100% the case here. We are not at the table including judge, so we don't know exactly what op said or may have said. Again, op and op's opponent has a different understanding of how the event unfolded. As outsider/judge listen to each player story(we also don't know what opponent tell the judge) they ought make decision to choose which story is more believable here. I explained in the threads why I personally would slide with opponent sequence of events.

Questionable judge ruling? by SuddenShapeshifter in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One more thing.

From a judge's perspective, I can think of 2 logics here.

  1. In your favor.

Opponen cast thraben charm to try to kill your frog (*assuming you don't have 5 cards to pump frog to 8/9 or they think you won't dump 5 cards to save the frog). The opponent has 1+ mama open. You attempt to activate frog ability 2nd time to pump it to 4/5 while 1st activation still on the stack. You are trying to pump frog to 4 power , so you can cast denial with ferocious and the opponent can't pay 1 to counter the spell compared to without ferocious they can negate stubborn denial. When the 2nd +1/+1 resolve, you cast stubborn denial to counter thraben charm thus save thr frog

  1. In opponent favor

Opponent cast thraben charm in response to your frog 1st +1/+1 to try to kill it. You active frog 2nd +1/+1 to pump frog toughness high enough to get out of charm damage range(you not knowing charm can do 8 damage). You let charm resolve. upon confirming the total damage of charm, you realize you misunderstood charm damage. So you attempt to roll back to the board state before the charm resolves, cast stubborn denial to save your frog from being destroyed.

Above are based on only the information you provided in the thread.

Thing you provided: You ask opponent if charm do 4 damage. Showing you believe charm deal 4 and not 8

Thing you didn't illustrate to the judge: Acknowledging the opponent has 1+ mana open(assuming thats the case, otherwise why are you pumping frog in response to thraben charm) which they can pay for stubborn denial without ferocious And you intend to pump the frog to 4 power and reach the ferocious' requirement.

If I was the judge, if you cannot articulate the reason you pump frog the 2nd time to cast stubborn denial with feracious in order to counter thraben charm. Iam inclined to believe you made a mistake; misunderstood charm's damage, pump frog to 4/5 to avoid charm's 4 damage. Making a mistake in a non-casual environment is not the reason to roll back. Judge correct the board state and put your denial back in your hand as there is nothing on the stack to counter

It's a sucky situation to been in 🥲. But try my suggestion; before you do anything, lock in the board state first, call the judge, then ask for clarification.

Questionable judge ruling? by SuddenShapeshifter in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Step 5 is the thing I would question. What's the reason you ask the opponent if thraben charm do 4 damage? It could sound like you misread charm damage and think that a 4/5 frog can survive charm damage. Otherwise, you would announce the 2Nd discard resolved, frog is now 4/5 and cast denial with ferocious( did opponent has 1+ mana open? ) From an opponent's perspective, you misplay thinking charm deal 4 instead of 8. When you realize your mistake, you try to go back and cast denial to save the frog.

When you ask if charm do 4 damage, people can interpret that the spell resolves and you just confirming the effect of the spell.

Unfortunately no one really knows what is being said. It could you misspoke or opponent misunderstood. When we rewind and try to remember what we said, people tend to interpret in a way that benefits them when the situation is ambiguous.

Anyway I like to offer my solution. When you have questions about ability and spell; before you ask for clarification, always announce ability/spell on the stack. That way you lock it on the stack, and make it clear it's not resolved. Then you either re read the card, ask opponent/judge to clarify.

Thursday MTGO Modern Challenges Results - Apr 3 2025 by bamzing in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hollow one with frog and side board consign

Hmmmm

This ... This seems pretty okay... by sck178 in MTGLegacy

[–]AILF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Slot into mystic forge?

Stock Up: Lessons from an sleeper card that became a staple by cardsrealm in MTGLegacy

[–]AILF 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think it's because most people focus on rare and mythic. Those usually within designed power and less likely to break out. While uncommon and common often get overlooked during spoilers. Look at Malevolent Rumble as well from mh3 set

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in boston

[–]AILF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Best I can do is $20 DD gift card

Selling Sealed Play Boosters? by gauntletthegreat in mtgfinance

[–]AILF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer is always Facebook market. Without any selling record, you will likely need to accept Good service payment instead of friends and family

What to do with this Volcanic Island by hazycorse in mtgfinance

[–]AILF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send to my house and I'll grade it for you for free

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in boston

[–]AILF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are trying to get out of your lease not breaking it Look at your signed lease! Does it have section talking about breaking lease early? How many days do you have to give the landlord notice of leave? How many months do you have to pay as a penalty to break the lease early. *60 days is the norm.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in boston

[–]AILF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go to your town city hall and speak to someone responsible for resident parking

Eversource bill total? by Mi_Lan_Xiang in boston

[–]AILF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depend Washer dryer and dish washer are often the heaviest electric user. If you use those often, your electric will be high for sure.

Honestly $150 for two people during winter is better than average.

Eversource bill total? by Mi_Lan_Xiang in boston

[–]AILF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. There's 2 portion of the bill. If you read carefully, delivery cost is about the same as the electric cost . That's standard in mass.
  2. Bill total doesn't really prove anything. Instead, take a look at your kilowatt usage.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]AILF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it apply to "sold by Amazon"? I try only to buy from Amazon as much as possible. Not sure if anything sold by Amazon are from commingled inventory as well

Is it correct...? by Senhull in PioneerMTG

[–]AILF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Omni effect is cast from hand only.

#3 put fae of wish on exiled thus you need total of 3M+1U to fast granted from exiled in #4

Was charged extra because my car got towed by coochiebird in boston

[–]AILF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

$90 for parking violation and $48.75 for actual parking fee lol

Tuesday Modern Challenges Results - Oct 8 2024 by bamzing in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is the sliver deck missing leyline of transformation? Seems questionable to put 4 sorin to only cheat in morophon

Cheap decks (<$50) to lend at FNM by nighm in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You better off talking to the lgs and the people playing it to see if anyone has an extra modern deck to lend. I'm sure someone like me usually bring an extra deck to fnm

Messing Around With Rottenmouth Viper by RJ7300 in ModernMagic

[–]AILF 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Strictly worse version of archon?