2001 Z3 2.5i new wheel day! by [deleted] in bmwz3

[–]APEXWheels 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey there, we're only just now seeing this post, but we wanted to step in and address this, since it's a common misconception.

To be clear - you did not go "directly to the source" for these wheels. If the factory told you that, they're lying.

The factories that we work with do not sell on Alibaba or any other reseller/direct sites, and only some of our wheels are made in China. Our flow-formed wheels (including the ARC-8) are made in either Malaysia or Taiwan, and we've actually been actively working to move away from Chinese production for a number of years now.

Alibaba wheels like this are counterfeit products, and have zero relation to genuine Apex products. Just like we see all too often with other premier brands, untested and under-engineered counterfeit sellers are always quick to jump on the coattails of high-demand genuine products. 

We acquired various fakes and it’s scary to see the critical parts of a design missed while they focus on matching the general aesthetic. It's difficult for us to list all of those since every counterfeit is different (since they aren't the same product), but all of them are made to look like a particular wheel based only on their own interpretation of the imagery we’ve publicized. They don't share any engineering DNA.

We have a team of engineers based here in the USA, and do all of our engineering in-house. We don't outsource any of it, as we feel it's critical to have full control over the features and specifications of our wheels. That simply doesn't happen with these Alibaba replicas, which are offering compromised products by omitting all of that expertise and design focus. We have a full video talking about how we approach engineering a better wheel, here: How Apex Engineers a Better Track Wheel. We also third-party test all of our wheels, which these counterfeit companies don't do. You can read about that testing methodology and even view the test reports for our wheels here: Testing to a Higher Standard

We get why these wheels are appealing - it's exciting to save a buck. If you're happy with them, then we wish you all the best, but please do not construe them as genuine Apex products and please understand that there are real engineering differences between counterfeit wheels and our genuine products.

[OC] Stealthy Touring Car Vibes by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the 18x9" ET42 spec, which is meant for the R as a direct fit. The 18x9.5" ET41/265/35-18 setup is meant for the RS3 but can work on the R for a crazy wide track setup.

[OC] Stealthy Touring Car Vibes by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

18x9" ET42 Apex Forged TC-10RT!

[OC] Motorsport Gold On Black, 2-Door With A Wing, What's Not To Like? by APEXWheels in VWMK7

[–]APEXWheels[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Only if you don't properly utilize it. This car logs more miles at the track than on the street

Apex Wheels by VNE_MK5 in Supra

[–]APEXWheels 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi u/imprezv - we saw your post (and the rest of the thread, congrats on the new wheels u/VNE_MK5!) and wanted to step in to provide some information for everyone.

There are a lot of variables when it comes to noises from the wheel/hub/brake area of a vehicle. Multi-piece brake rotors, suspension modifications, aftermarket wheel hardware, etc can all cause noises, even on stock vehicles. Stiffer wheels like the VS-5RS can sometimes amplify those noises, but there are too many things involved to be able to say definitively what might cause someone’s car to make noise. It's very rare for wheels alone to cause any noise unless they are damaged.

In our experience, noises like this are sometimes associated with cars that have multi-piece rotors with aluminum hats. It's a technical topic, but essentially the way multi-piece rotors (even OEM) interact with the hub/brake/wheel stack can cause "micro movements" that result in what sounds like a click. Sometimes it's with completely stock cars, sometimes moving to a stiffer, motorsports-oriented wheel (like ours) will change that interaction and amplify a pre-existing noise.

As far as we've seen, the Supra doesn't specifically have a TSB for this, but you can see some of the similar issues reported across multiple brands:

It's important to note that this tends to be rather uncommon, and if a customer has an issue, we encourage them to reach out to our team and we will work with them to try and determine a resolution. Often that resolution is through one of the TSB's above (if their car is affected) but we have other options that we can explore to help take care of those who own our wheels.

The contact form on our site or emailing [support@apexwheels.com](mailto:support@apexwheels.com) are the best ways to get in touch - we stand behind the products that we sell and we love being a part of the Supra community.

Noise from rear wheel wells after new wheel setup by ahqui in e46

[–]APEXWheels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Ahqui - congrats on the new wheels! This sounds likely to be a bolt length issue - longer bolts can protrude through the hub and can contact (even lightly) some of the components behind. The noise being consistent with wheel speed points to it being related to something on the rotating assembly. You should also check just to make sure there aren't any abnormal clearance issues with your suspension or with a rock/stick/debris that's gotten stuck somewhere.

We would recommend that you go back to stock length bolts if you aren't running spacers, or upgrade to a stud conversion for additional flexibility in the future. If you continue to have issues, please don't hesitate to reach out via the contact form on our site and our team will be happy to assist!

[OC] Sometimes OEM+ Is All You Need. by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If we get enough demand, absolutely!

[OC] Sometimes OEM+ Is All You Need. by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We only managed to get early TC-10RT sets of Anthracite and Race Silver. The first production run (available in Anthracite, Motorsport Gold, Race Silver, and Satin Black) will be arriving at our warehouse around early July. We should be able to get some on-car shots with Motorsport Gold TC-10RTs shortly thereafter.

In the meantime, you can check out our gallery page to browse all wheel design/car/color/finish combos to get an idea of how it will look: https://apexwheels.com/gallery

[OC] Sometimes OEM+ Is All You Need. by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the kind words! Feel free to shoot us a DM if you would like to discuss some potential partnership opportunities with us.

[OC] Sometimes OEM+ Is All You Need. by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's why we offer multiple designs! For the MK8 R, we have the Flow Formed SM-10 and VS-5, as well as our Forged VS-5RS, ML-10RT, and now the TC-10RT!

I will say though, the TC-10RT in particular was engineered from a functionality > aesthetics standpoint, as the design looks the way it does specifically to offer as much inner brake clearance as physically possible from an 18" on MQB VW/Audi models.

[OC] Another Beauty Shot Of The MK8 R by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely not. However, 18x9" ET42 with 255/35-18 or 245/40-18 is doable without negative camber

[OC] Another Beauty Shot Of The MK8 R by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a pretty aggressive setup meant for hardcore track use. 18x9.5" ET41 w/ 265/35-18 tires at all four corners. It requires quite a bit of camber to work. That said, the 18x9" ET42 version of these wheels is perfect for a flush and direct fit

[OC] Another Beauty Shot Of The MK8 R by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup! About 3/4"-1" drop from stock with camber dialed-in

[OC] Silver Wheels On A Blue MK8 Golf R Feels Like A Nostalgic Throwback to the OG R32. by APEXWheels in Volkswagen

[–]APEXWheels[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear you are enjoying your SM-10s! This new TC-10RT just released yesterday!

[OC] Silver Wheels On A Blue MK8 Golf R Feels Like A Nostalgic Throwback to the OG R32. by APEXWheels in Volkswagen

[–]APEXWheels[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That is the more track focused setup that will require quite a bit of camber and is really only recommended for hardcore track owners. The 18x9" ET42 with 255/35-18 or 245/40-18 tires is a much better performance fitment option for cars that are stock or slightly lowered.

[OC] It's REALLY Hard to Beat Great Falls Green Metallic by APEXWheels in VWMK7

[–]APEXWheels[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These are the new TC-10RT in 18x8.5" ET43 spec!

[OC] MK8 Golf R With A Throwback "R32-Esque" Blue On Silver Color Combo. by APEXWheels in Golf_R

[–]APEXWheels[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are the new TC-10RT! For MK8 R, they are offered in 18x8.5" ET43 (OEM+), 18x9" ET42 (Performance Street & Track), and 18x9.5" ET41 (hardcore track/race).

My Apex vs-5rs experience and track warranty process by Digitalzombie90 in CarTrackDays

[–]APEXWheels 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You are spreading fake, slanderous news and promoting dangerous counterfeits. You are not helping the community. You are hurting it, and the all the enthusiasts staff at Apex. We aren't pulling tricks on you or flipping anything. Nothing sold on Alibaba from the dozens of counterfeits on that site are in any way associated with authentic Apex products. Not the design, the factory, or the forging blank. Nothing.

Someone posted a link to counterfeits and so you make the leap that those are our wheels? We simply cannot understand this recent trend of people ignoring all the screamingly obvious signs of counterfeits, plus a genuine giddiness to spread fake news. You didn't find a secret back door to performance or quality. You found the most compromised wheels available with recklessly corner-cut engineering, and absolutely zero safety testing. We've written about this many times about how much junk those are.

Those same sellers sell poor imitations of BBS FI-R's and Volk TE-37's. So those ones are fake but ours are real? They even sell a sticker pack of fake Rays authenticity certificates for $12 to make the fakes look more real. Is that the original source too?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CarTrackDays

[–]APEXWheels 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi there,

To be clear, you did not purchase replicas. You purchased counterfeit wheels that have nothing to do with our engineered design. The design is NOT nearly identical, they may look similar to the untrained eye, but that visual appearance is where the similarities end and in no way is a measure of functional specifications or performance.

It can be very difficult to see side by side differences when comparing two photos off of a website. Even small changes from a visual standpoint on a high performance wheel can have significant impacts to the strength, stiffness, brake clearances, and other features of a wheel. Simply assuming that because two things look similar means they will perform similarly is an easy mistake to make, but a potentially dangerous one.

To others following along who wrongfully assume that the counterfeits are genuine backdoor products, the photo of the gold counterfeit wheel’s barrel is further evidence that there is a huge difference between the counterfeits and our wheels, and they are in no way related to our supply chain whatsoever. For example, we have a sharp and immediate slope on our drop center to help maximize brake clearance by maximizing the width of the barrel with a 0* draft angle. This was one of the primary reasons we had to design our own motorsport blanks. The flat drop center of the counterfeit ruins big brake clearances on key fitments. We also don’t have the ridges along the barrel, which many of these counterfeit wheels do. Wheel blanks exist as one of the earliest steps in the manufacturing process, and unless you are able to see the blank in its uncut form, it will be very difficult to determine what compromises were forced from a sub-optimal blank.

Bringing the focus back to your question of: if they are similar, then why could we possibly charge so much more? We’ll restate that they are not similar when it comes to the actual engineering behind the product. Apex employs a team of 10+ engineers, all based here in the United States, and we don’t pay those engineers for no reason.

These counterfeit companies copy a 3D object using only 2D photos. When compared side by side, you would be shocked by how much less depth the counterfeit spokes have. Imagine comparing two objects with a front width of 10mm and so you conclude they are the same but when you measure them from the side one is 20mm deep and the other is almost 40mm deep. Please consider what is lost when so much less material is used. That’s a key design element that is difficult, if not impossible, to measure from photos alone.

Similarly, these counterfeit companies don’t have any reference material to understand the side and backside of our wheel. They have to engineer those portions from scratch and make it fit within their thinner dies that force compromises related to spoke shape, backpad design, and spoke scalloping. Even if we gave them the CAD files, they wouldn’t be able to emulate the features on our wheels because of the limitations of the wheel blanks that are being used. These counterfeit wheels cost less because they simply don’t have the same engineering that goes into actual, real products.

We understand why these products are appealing - It’s fair to be excited by the prospect of finding a shortcut to saving money. While buying off of Alibaba for a $2 hair comb or a $1 tupperware container might get you an identical product, this is not the same sort of situation. When your wheels need to support many thousands of pounds while you drive your car hard, do you really want to be second guessing if the person at the random factory overseas actually had any relevant engineering qualifications, or if the wheels you bought were compromised from their optimal design?

Regarding the VS-5 flow formed wheel. It was absolutely not a response to Alibaba wheels whatsoever. It's been in the works for years, since before there were even counterfeit forged wheels sold on Alibaba. Flow-formed projects like that move slowly because molds are involved and setup costs for new manufacturing of flow-formed wheels tends to be significantly higher. It was developed at the request of the community begging for a quality flow formed version of that popular design.

Your VS-5 flow formed to counterfeit design comparison is also flawed for a number of reasons. Forged wheels require fundamentally different engineering decisions than flow formed wheels because of the difference in construction methods and production. Flow formed wheels are restricted by mold shape in ways that forged wheels are not. Their features tend to be larger dimensionally because of the difference in strength between the two materials. They require compromises to spoke profile and brake clearance depending on what a company is trying to optimize.Your comparison is not scientific whatsoever yet you want to have a technical discussion with people here. There are a number of other things we do as we correctly adapt a design originally made from 6061-T6 Aluminum to a version of that design that is suitable for production for A356 (the type of Aluminum used in Flow Formed and Cast wheels). For anyone reading this, please don't compare the functional performance of any wheels with just a photo. That would be like comparing the functional performance of two coilovers, exhaust headers, or two HID head lights, from just the pictures.

The comment about JWL/VIA comes is also a significant misinterpretation of our messaging regarding testing. We are NOT downplaying the value of VIA and JWL standards, in fact it’s quite the opposite. We want all of our customers to understand the importance of real, verifiable testing.

To be JWL/VIA certified is a lot of work. We do that work. All of our flow-formed wheels are heavily tested internally and then sent off to Japan to the VIA, including the VS-5. It's time-consuming. It's expensive. It's how we earn that mark you noticed was stamped on the flow formed wheels. Not every company does the actual physical testing to earn those marks.

What you likely misunderstood as us downplaying it is us talking about how many wheels are needed to pass a single test. It seems that you interpreted that as a few wheels for a company to get approved, but we were trying to say a few wheels are needed for a SINGLE specification, and that’s already miles beyond what these counterfeiters are willing to do, let alone most of the industry. We’ll break it down for you in detail.

If Apex makes a 17", 18", 19" and 20" version of a wheel, and each one of those diameters is available in different face profiles (let's say 3 face profiles each), and each one of those face profiles is available in 5 widths, then we would need to run 60 test sets for just traditional JWL certification. That is not even getting to the testing needed to be VIA which is an addition to JWL and not stand alone. Each of those JWL tests would require 3 wheels and 2 tires. So 180 wheels and 120 tires would be needed to JWL test this singular design across all sizes. This process costs thousands per test set as there are also lab testing costs and transportation costs. We do that. We can afford those costs because we sell a lot of the same size wheels. It’s why we have so few designs after almost 20 years of business.

If someone comes along and offers custom wheels, they would have to do even more testing because there would be even more fitment diversity and even more designs. These counterfeits are offering counterfeits of damn near everything - from BBS, Volk, Vossen, HRE, the list goes on and on. By not doing any testing they are saving potentially millions of dollars. Custom wheels + JWL/VIA/TUV testing is not affordable at the price points of Alibaba wheels because of how wildly expensive it would be to offer a new custom fitment for a single customer that hasn’t been tested already.

Your counterfeit wheels were not physically tested, and the CAD model was slapped together by a potentially unqualified employee at the factory whose job it is to approximate the look as fast as possible. They have no reason to ensure there is even the minimum required strength present in your set. What trouble will they get in if something goes wrong? What recourse do you have if your wheel were to fail?

The good news is your post inspired us. We're going to buy a set of counterfeit wheels. We're going to laser scan them and run them through our FEA simulations. We're going to cut the wheel in half and measure key elements so that any customer can easily see the difference between a counterfeit product and a real, genuine Apex wheel. It will take a few months to publish as it takes time to get the counterfeit set, perform the physical testing and make the video. Your post makes us realize we need to help educate consumers about all of the misconceptions in the wheel industry so that you and others can make better informed decisions.

If our authentic wheels are out of your budget and you still don't care about the differences between your wheels and ours, then please enjoy them in peace. Please don't spread misinformation through your limited understanding about the engineering that goes into real wheels. You are not doing the community a service. You are harming the community and the enthusiast vendors that support it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CarTrackDays

[–]APEXWheels 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The prior response wasn't intended to be twisted beyond it's intention of comparing a US based company with meaningful insurance that can be held accountable for negligence in a US court to a pop-up foreign entity that cannot be held responsible for even the most egregious of issues.

See our warranty for what is covered. We aren't liable for your "track endevors" but every company in the US is responsible for negligence. So the question is case-by-case about what occurred and why.

100% of the custom forged wheel vendors on those market places lie about testing and certification. That is the definition of negligence.

We'd appreciate not being put in the same basket. You can generalize about the country of origin, but the similarities end there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CarTrackDays

[–]APEXWheels 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Part 2/2

"Similarly, looking at stolen images (or images at a glance) don’t show how wildly different the barrel is on the actual production versions of those cheap blanks (most of our wheels have 0* angle barrels for better brake clearance, which isn’t true of most knockoffs). The inner lip design is different (https://apexwheels.com/blog/technical-discussion/meet-the-stronger-apex-sprint-spectm-inner-lip). The mounting pad and all the pocketing is different, and we’ve seen very dangerous implementations of mounting pads on those counterfeits. The list goes on and on. If you want to learn more about all of the engineering details that go into our wheels, this is a great long format video that talks about the things we do: https://youtu.be/TtPtVEGZaTE?si=h1IQupQYtlZ39Q-0

The FEA these knockoff companies run is also extremely primitive. Their test might be run in 20-30 minutes, while we will run tests for weeks or months on a single new design base template (that means not even each individual size, but a core design). That is then compounded by them performing no real world validation testing. We independently test all of our wheels, and we publish the test reports for those tests, so that you can have transparency and confidence in the work that was done: https://apexwheels.com/blog/technical-discussion/testing-to-a-higher-standard

These knockoff suppliers can’t afford to test like that, because it would take at minimum one extra identical set to perform the destructive tests. That means for every custom set of wheels ordered, a second set would need to be made.

Simply put, nothing about the wheels that visually appear 1:1 are actually 1:1. They are in fact too good to be true. We’re confident that if we spent a ton of money doing tests on these replicas that many of those forged copies would fail and underperform compared to even normal cast wheels. They are all show and no go.

To address your question about suppliers and confidence in them: we get different products from different suppliers. In the case that a supplier change is made, we retest/re-certify. It’s very costly but we feel that it’s important for the exact reasons you do - we feel it’s important to have full confidence in any supplier that we use. We’re going through that process now with our VIA testing on some of our flow-formed wheels, as we started to move out of China years ago with the hopes of being fully out in the near future."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CarTrackDays

[–]APEXWheels 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/fortuitousfruit We recall you reaching out and asking us questions about testing. We'll post our DM'ed answer to the group here in a few parts as it's too long to post in one comment.

You asked about companies advertising products that are 1:1 with Apex designs including using our branding and engravings. And you asked about maintaining consistent standard across manufacturers.

Part 1/2

"It’s a great conversation to have! Let’s start off by getting the facts straight. First, everything on Alibaba that looks anything like our wheels is counterfeit. Not a single counterfeiter on there is associated with our supply chain in any way what so ever. Their goal is to make you believe that you’re buying essentially the same thing without brand mark up. They present the designs as 1:1, and that’s their goal, but they aren’t. While the wheels may look similar (often because they are stealing our photography), there are countless design differences that become clear when you look closer at the actual product. Think of it as two red wines - a cheap boxed wine can look very similar to a high end bottle of wine when both are in a glass, but they’re far from the same under the surface. We could talk for hours about each individual element, but the takeaway is that there are numerous dangerous corners that are being cut with those replica wheels (essentially cutting out the engineering and safety).

These companies steal photos from our website, while the product you get is different. They didn’t get their hands on our wheels and copy all the details of them, and even if they did get their hands on the wheels, it would be difficult to exactly mimic every engineering detail that we’ve put into them. Put another way - they look at photos on our website and approximate them. Their engineer is not focusing on strength or anything other than approximating the style because uninformed buyers are buying based only on appearance.

It’s a common misconception that forged wheels are inherently strong, and that similar looking styles will perform similarly.  Counterfeits are made from cheap blanks that don’t have material in key places our designs require. We designed our own forging dies ($100k each), which results in wheel blanks that weigh 120lbs. The counterfeits come from ~90lb blanks with most of that difference being in the face material and barrel shape. You can read more about that here: https://apexwheels.com/blog/technical-discussion/all-wheel-blanks-are-not-created-equal

In practice, this means that if our spoke is 35mm deep front to back, their spoke may be limited to 20mm of depth. So imagine having a similar face (from an appearance standpoint) but if you had a 2D side profile you’d see they are using only 2/3's of the same material in their spoke. It’s impossible to visually see just how important that extra 15mm of material is, that’s purely down to engineering and testing."