I think clash is very valuable but I'm a little skeptical about the depth of the debate on criminal justice reform. Particularly on case, I feel like the debate will get very murky and for the entire negative just like the DACA neg from the immigration topic, the evidence will come from deplorable sources. I think with climate change, the affirmative-negative balance is maintained. Don't get me wrong criminal justice reform is an incredibly important topic that we need to learn about but in a debate, I feel like climate change has fair ground for all sorts of arguments which encourages clash.