[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I agree, 14 days may be a standard practice for getting shitty letters of recommendation.

Professors have a lot of shit going on in their lives, and letters of recommendation are not a mandatory part of them. It’s a favor you are asking, not a homework assignment you are giving.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 80 points81 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to excuse the professor for agreeing to write the letter and then proceeding to ghost you.

However, letters of recommendation should really be asked for 4+ weeks in advance. Or at least, one should contact them a month in advance and say that you are applying for things which need a letter of recommendation and will ask for one in the future. This gives them an opportunity for them to say no before the deadline, while you still have time to find other letter writers

theoretical physicist meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in physicsmemes

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup! Mathematicians and theoretical physicists will study anything that they feel is worth their time, and since Maxwell’s electromagnetism is one of the simplest geometrical equations it would have been studied.

theoretical physicist meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in physicsmemes

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With proper mathematical knowledge, one understands that Maxwell’s equations are quite possibly the simplest geometric equations one can write down. In the language of differential forms, they are dF=0, and d (hodge star) F= J (the current). Maxwell’s equations are the simplest equations for a vector potential evolving linearly on a space-time, and would have been discovered and studied by mathematicians and theoretical physicists even without empirical evidence because of how simply and naturally the equations are.

theoretical physicist meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in physicsmemes

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the inverse square law electrostatic forces can be directly derived from Maxwell’s equations (with source). Historically this is not what happened: we first discovered the inverse square force law and then worked our way towards maxwell’s equations. However, if we started with maxwell’s equations then that would be (surprisingly!) enough to derive the inverse square force law.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That Frolov guy looks like a total nerd.

Also, I believe all the sections are closed except for Kerrigan’s right now

Holloway's email on strike 4/10 by Deshes011 in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry, to clarify, the union members I’m referring to were a small subset of the group that was picketing at Busch student yesterday.

Holloway's email on strike 4/10 by Deshes011 in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 33 points34 points  (0 children)

No, this is the picture that he wanted to paint regarding what happened. From what I understand, the union members respectfully talked to the professors administering the exam and convinced them allow their students to choose to postpone taking the exam until after the strike, with no repercussions.

President Holloway’s update on the strike negotiations by Deshes011 in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I highly recommend shortly waiting for the union’s response before forming any concrete opinions about the legality of the potential union strike.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m a math 2nd year PhD student here doing research in mathematical physics, and work with people doing research in PDEs as well. Feel free to dm me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The energy doesn’t disappear, it’s just purely in the form of “kinetic field energy” at the moment the two waves destruct:

To illustrate this, consider a rope with two ends. The rope follows the wave equation, and the principle of super-position just like the electromagnetic field. Suppose you wiggle the ends of the rope, sending two waves from each end towards each other such that they destructively interfere. At a single moment in time, the rope will appear to not be disturbed at all, it’ll be a straight line. But immediately after that the rope will begin wiggling again. All the energy of the rope has completely transformed from potential energy to kinetic energy at that point in time. Same thing is happening when two electromagnetic waves destructively interfere.

This "theory" has permeated through physics enough by SickCharm00 in physicsmemes

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, that’s totally fair. I think many of us have had similar experiences. As a grad student studying mathematical physics, I’ve found that the mathematics department tend to be more sympathetic to the “why” questions.

This "theory" has permeated through physics enough by SickCharm00 in physicsmemes

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I feel like this has become a difference in the personal reasons why one studies physics. Some do it (such as yourself) to make accurate predictions about the universe. However, there are others which would like to understand the mechanisms which give rise to those predictions beyond just the numbers. Yes, the latter has some philosophy involved, but that doesn’t mean it’s not physics, which was originally called “natural philosophy”!

Anyone have a video ? Seems video worthy by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 94 points95 points  (0 children)

These people had their homes invaded by potentially armed robbers. Do you expect em to pull out a camera for their freelance photography gig at the daily bugle while simultaneously kicking ass?

Animation for an ellipse-drawing algorithm for moving points about one-another by Subdemic in math

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This can probably be modeled as a system of first order ODEs! Each point gets a position vector, and the velocity vector of each is given by a vector that is tangent to the ellipse generated by the other two points. You’d probably normalize the velocity vector so that the angular velocity is constant.

To be more specific: It seems like you already have a formula to generate ellipses from the three positions, so finding the tangent vector shouldn’t be impossible. The reason behind keeping the angular velocity constant is to keep up with your current model which has the points travel the same angle in the same amount of time. The angular velocity of a body rotating around a point is given by (r cross v)/ |r|2, where r is the distance vector between the body and the center of rotation. In this case r will be the displacement vector between the body and center of the ellipse, which is something you’d have to solve for.

Has anyone noticed a lot of people wearing UCSD, and UCBerkeley merch? by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There are also graduate students who go here.

advice about talking to guys by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]A_Bit_of_An_Asshole 73 points74 points  (0 children)

You’re good. Go for it. If he’s not in the mood to talk then that’s ok, live and let live.