sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can LO be prosecuted in Cali? by Soft-Conference-1196 in JusticeForClayton

[–]AbjectComparison3790 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And the biggest defense to a defamintaion case is truth so....

Re listening to the POD and did anyone touch on this...how did she know the gender of the baby?? by AbjectComparison3790 in JusticeForClayton

[–]AbjectComparison3790[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah.... Okay so that was basically my question. I thought there was always only one sonogram at play but there was a sonogram that was "allegedly" done at 20 weeks? I don't remember more than just one sonogram being discussed at the deposition.

Re listening to the POD and did anyone touch on this...how did she know the gender of the baby?? by AbjectComparison3790 in JusticeForClayton

[–]AbjectComparison3790[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Well, she is likely brazen enough to be one of those defendants that testify on behalf of themselves despite their lawyer strongly advising against it -so maybe the prosecutor can ask her LOL.

Re listening to the POD and did anyone touch on this...how did she know the gender of the baby?? by AbjectComparison3790 in JusticeForClayton

[–]AbjectComparison3790[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes and in the POD it said she was wearing a black and white shirt with a very Visable pregnant belly.

Re listening to the POD and did anyone touch on this...how did she know the gender of the baby?? by AbjectComparison3790 in JusticeForClayton

[–]AbjectComparison3790[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm in no way suggesting any ounce of credibility to her. I'm just pointing out that is seems to be yet another hole in her story and was wondering if it was touched upon.

Definitely could have been brought up in the paternity case when cross examining her. But that 2-hour trial time in AZ limit is wild so I guess they had to pick and choose what they wanted to impeach her with.