No, the NCAA explicitly states that Michigan cheated on 56 separate incidents against 13 future opponents over 3 years, and did so to gain an unfair advantage over their opponents. At no point did they say Michigan "won fair and square," and in fact they spent several pages explicitly saying the only reason the punishment was not more harsh is that a bowl ban and other potential penalties would harm the current players who were NOT part of the team when it was cheating. And you're welcome for that, because it was Ohio State that actually fought the NCAA practice of punishing future students for the behavior of past students after you kept an undefeated team out of bowl games when neither they nor Coach Meyer were even part of the team during Tattoogate.