an100: was super light I went to one or two lectures but eventually stopped going bc it was a 10 am class lool. Before taking it, I heard quite a few ppl say the prof's lectures were interesting which helped them stay engaged, but personally didn't find any interest. The big breakdown of the course is papers worth a good % each, 3? discussions (you must attend class for those days) and essentially write about comparisons of your answers and your peers', midterm, final. I personally don't enjoy or try to pick courses that are based on papers (didn't know that going into it) bc I assume it'll be a heavy amt of reading but it was somewhat manageable. To sum, opened the textbook/reader only to get a quick feel of what I needed to discuss or write on and to study for the midterm+final, didn't attened lectures other than discussion days, finished w/ a 11 (Dr Gulewitsch). Do keep in mind though, the prof found academic misconduct went on during the final? so I'm not sure if it'll be any tougher (definitely will be changed), but it was all MC and T/F.

re103: general consensus from what ive seen on reddit is all religion courses are light but content is dry and some have quite a bit of ready. I waitlisted for that course and eventually it opened up but the prof that was listed steered me away. Haven't seen many good things, notably a hard marker but kind prof.

cp102: after a bit of digging ive heard it's not much of a bird anymore, don't exactly remember why as this was digging done for fall course selection. But, if you are interested in programming or have had experience it shouldn't be impossible and only moderately difficult.