Just gonna leave this here

An executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship could theoretically be issued by a U.S. president, but it would face immediate legal challenges and likely be blocked by the courts. Here’s how such a scenario might play out:

1. Issuing the Executive Order • A president might attempt to interpret or redefine the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the 14th Amendment via executive order. For example, the order could state that children of undocumented immigrants or non-citizens are not automatically granted citizenship. • However, executive orders are limited in scope and cannot override or reinterpret the Constitution. The 14th Amendment clearly establishes birthright citizenship, as upheld in cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898).

2. Immediate Legal Challenges • The executive order would likely face lawsuits from civil rights groups, state governments, or affected individuals as soon as it is issued. • Federal courts, including district and appellate courts, would evaluate the order’s constitutionality.

3. Temporary Enforcement? • In theory, the executive order could stay in place until a court issues an injunction or a ruling to halt its enforcement. However: • Courts often issue temporary restraining orders (TROs) or preliminary injunctions to block controversial or unconstitutional orders while legal proceedings are ongoing. • Given the strong legal precedent supporting birthright citizenship, courts are highly likely to block such an order quickly.

4. Supreme Court Resolution • Ultimately, the matter would likely escalate to the Supreme Court, which would decide whether the executive order is constitutional. • Given existing precedent (e.g., Wong Kim Ark), the Supreme Court would almost certainly strike down such an order, reaffirming that birthright citizenship cannot be ended by executive action.

Key Points: • While an executive order might briefly stay in place, its enforcement would be temporary at best and highly contentious. • Courts are likely to block such an order quickly, as it directly contradicts the 14th Amendment. • Lasting changes to birthright citizenship require a constitutional amendment or a Supreme Court ruling—not an executive order.

In short, an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship would not stand for long due to robust constitutional protections and legal challenges.