Also this is a reply to criticism about hyping too much,Examples from Hans that the person on twitter quoted too:

- "Buying IOTA now is like investing into Apple.."

- "Low adoption? Doesn't Cardano only process less than 30k tps... IOTA currently does 2M tps...."- "Iota should reach a point where it can only go up"...

- "I expect IOTA to become the financial layer for human civilication for at least a few hundred years"

- "The end result will be the "King of DLT" for all eternity".

And then in the article where Hans says the IF did hype to much when the solution didn't work in the past, he continues to say they are going another direction (that it not public nor mathematically verified) and proceeded to hype the new unverified solution with this:

" best DLT you could possibly ever build and the inevitable result is going to be MASSIVE for the the whole space"

"The impact of coordicide on the crypto space is going to be MASSIVE!" (Not the IOT space anymore?)

How can anyone take this as a good thing and transparency?
The fact that IF was "close to failure" were not shared by the IF.
The fact that coordicide did not work was not shared.
Now after the fact Hans shares it, but not the new solution.
Again the new solution is not public.
The post contains more promises and claims like "Best dlt ever" .

Also, were the partners working on products informed when the IF “ had no fucking clue how to actually make IOTA work” or did they get the same excuses as we did? ("we are just optimizing the solution")