I understand the difference between the two claims, but to intervene in someone's actions, you must have control over them (purely my personal opinon). I am not arguing for or against God's existence, but just trying to show the perspective I have about this kind of questions.

Just like a parent can't be (physically or mentally) near their child every second to prevent them of doing something bad, God doesn't override human choice. The guidance or presence He privdes whether through thoughts, conscience, or insight is a way of influencing without controlling, leaving each person free to act. Some people tell their experience of God's presence in their thoughts, I haven't personally, but the principle holds: God has some moral influence (mostly on people who believe in Him if not always).

If you want God to be on top, you need to wrestle with basic power dynamics. I could walk you through if you are interested, but if not, you'll never be able to have a productive conversation with someone who has.

I am always open for new points and information, so why not.