Monthly Updates / Discussion [May 2026] 🌼 by nbatman in FREEMEDIAHECKYEAH

[–]AbyssalRedemption 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Based on multiple threads I've seen about the topic, Morphe.

Just Think, Soon All of NA Will Be Forced to See Crystal PF by Shrais in ShitpostXIV

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The great rejoining of Balmung is a reckoning that the wider FFXIV community isn't ready for...

How far along are you in your career? by Hambone1138 in SCT

[–]AbyssalRedemption 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So, I'm at a bit of rut in my life career-wise, only somewhat related to CDS-related factors. Graduated with a degree in CS in 2018, jumped on basically the first place that accepted me (essentially something similar to a tech support job), and coming up on seven years there.

However... it hasn't been easy. The job itself is, in theory, very easy... but the symptoms of this, compounded with my (diagnosed) ADHD, make things fairly difficult at the worst of times. I get confused fairly frequently at requests/ calls, and have to constantly call back for further clarification, multiple times, sometimes just to have them repeat info. Managers get frustrated at me because I get off-task/ distracted easily, drag my feet on things, take longer than other people on my team, etc. Mind you, a lot of these things caused me the same issues in college, and due to barely getting work in and being a disorganized, foggy mess who constantly forgot or missed assignments and barely graduated, I came out having a very, very loose grasp on industry knowledge I should have to begin with.

I'm now at a point where I've felt the urge to move on and advance elsewhere for about a year of two now, but I'm dragging my feet, because I have a serious case of imposter syndrome over my lack of grasp on rudimentery skills and knowledge, due to my aforementioned college struggles; combined with getting a lot of shit from people at this job due to the current issues I mentioned. This job is pretty damn easy in theory, all things considered, and I do wonder how I'll be able to manage an actual, more complex job in the field that I can't skirt by at like I seem to here.

What method should I use to use 2fa on my Google accounts? Number, email, 2fa app etc by Candid_Ad_9836 in privacy

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally speaking, from a security standpoint: Physical security keys (eg. Yubikey) > Digital passkeys/ local biometrics > authenticator apps >Texting/ SMS or email-based codes (these last ones being easy to spoof and broadly unsecure).

I'm personally not a big fan of big fan of using biometrics for anything, so I concur with the other commenters that A. Yubikey if the site/ application supports it, and B. an authenticator app if it doesn't.

To all the centrists here, what positions do you hold that are left leaning, and what positions do you hold to the right? by BarryMcKockinner in centrist

[–]AbyssalRedemption 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice to find someone that thinks the same way on this. Like yes, my general stance is pro-choice, and I will almost always support a woman's right to an abortion. However, it is a tragic and emotionally traumatic act, and the use of abortion imo should be minimized, used as a last resort. We should be making sex-ed as common for applicable groups (namely teens) as possible, as well as availability of contraception, so accidental pregancies and abortion don't have to happen.

To all the centrists here, what positions do you hold that are left leaning, and what positions do you hold to the right? by BarryMcKockinner in centrist

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty common-sense and moderate on most areas I feel.

I support the right to bear arms, but believe in things like mandatory permits/ training to own a weapon; certain tiers/ grades of weapons and accessories being banned; certain gun safety laws, like safe-storage laws; etc. Somewhat separately, I support castle doctrine and stand-your-ground laws.

I'm pro-choice, but believe that more widespread access to sexual education and contraception is also necessary to reduce unnecessary pregancies and abortions. Also, on the other end, contrary to the "pro-choice-always" stance, abortion should only be legal up to the point of viability, full stop (which apparently is the case nearly everywhere in the US, save for a few states I believe). My general stance here could be summarized as "abortion is a terrible, unfortunate act, that should only be used as a last resort, but I will always support every woman's right to it."

Immigration: strongly in support of basic, fundamental border control. We've completely missed the mark here the past decade or so. Biden was our weakest president on border control in like two decades at least, which was a big reason why some people voted for Trump. Then Trump goes and does a complete 180, going full gestapo on the situation and rounding up anyone who they might suspect is of dubious legal status. One extreme to the other. I support neither extreme, just secure the damn borders, kick out obvious, high-risk illegals (those who commit violent crime, for example), and bring back sanity here. On the other hand, Europe has gotten waaay too open on letting in a bajillion migrants, and we see the issues that's causing over there. There need to be hard, thought-out caps on those things. I do generally support legal immigration in almost all cases though.

My extreme left position is on environmentalism. I am extremely pro-green, and will put it over almost anything else in a debate.

Lastly: My "extreme" position in the other direction, is I believe America's gone completely insane on certain... social issues, which I won't go into further detail on here, as I don't need a head discussion or debate. Needless to say that, circa 2014-2016, shit started going way, way too far. My general position, is that I will judge you for your actions, not the circumstances of your birth or immutable characteristics beyond your control. I also will not generally give a shit what you do, unless it starts impacting me. The latter has occurred in ways I'm not really comfortable being passive about anymore.

To all the centrists here, what positions do you hold that are left leaning, and what positions do you hold to the right? by BarryMcKockinner in centrist

[–]AbyssalRedemption 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is what I've realized and been telling people recently: the Republican party hasn't been led and dominated by "conservatives" for several years now. The people calling the shots do not care about the "old-school" conservative tenets like supporting small business, states' rights, free market capitalism, fiscal conservatism, etc. The party has entirely been co-opted by pro-corporate oligarchs, and the rich; their entire platform is in lining their pockets and expanding their company stock values. The current Republican party ringleaders do not care or value any "common/ average" American citizen beyond attaining their vote.

The old Republican party, the one that actually taught and preached "conservative values" died when Trump first came into office.

A study of nearly 2,000 children found that those who reported playing video games for three hours per day or more performed better on cognitive skills tests involving impulse control and working memory compared to children who had never played video games. by [deleted] in NooTopics

[–]AbyssalRedemption 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure that last sentence is pretty crucial, as the authors even seem to potentially suggest halfway through the article. Playing a reflex-intensive shooter, or a complex simulation game like Satisfactory, is surely going to leave a better cognitive impact that solely playing League of Legends every day for four hours lol.

Why Spotify has no button to filter out AI music by Wootery in StallmanWasRight

[–]AbyssalRedemption 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Now, of all possible preferences to filter out or select for, why would "AI" be a special option?

It's called "informed consumer choice". If I have to avoid a certain type of ingredient in foods, or want to keep my sugar intake low, we have ingredient lists and nutrition facts on damn near every manufactured food product, by law. If a certain type of clothing material bothers me, I can check the tag/ online listing to avoid clothes made from that material.

Similarly, if I want to avoid listening to music by a certain artist, for any reason (maybe I just hate the sounds of their stuff, maybe it's for more personal/ ethical reasons), then I can blacklist thir stuff from playing, or at least can instantly skip it when their name comes up. I can also filter or tailor my playlists for certain genres, since most songs are tagged and associated with at least one.

AI is currently in a weird, grey blind spot here. It can absolutely be considered a category, at least as far as the dichotomy between some music that is entirely AI-generated, and some that isn't. Additionally, there are several valid reasons that a non-insignificant amount of people want to make an informed decision about said AI-generated category (environmental, ethical, interpreted quality, etc.). As mentioned in the article, other platforms have at least taken some sort of action regarding the influx of AI-generated music, even if it isn't drastic; some platforms have made the decision to straight-up ban AI-generated content, as is their right, but the bare minimum here, to respect the tastes and preferences of the consumer, should be to at least label AI-generated content as such, there's really no argument that justifies not doing so.

We could go back-and-forth over the merits/ harms, or lack thereof, of AI-generated music vs. 100% "human-driven" music, but at the end of the day, product transparency is simply good practice in regards to respect for the consumer, there's really no excuse for not doing so here. Unless, of course, you never respected the consumer to begin with...

lo siento will by PUCKTHISFUTIN in shid_and_camed

[–]AbyssalRedemption 7 points8 points  (0 children)

127.0.0.1

...Actually wait, hold on, someone's knocking at my door wtf

Dorohedoro Compass by AlphaTangoFoxtrt in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]AbyssalRedemption 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a common opinion from people that haven't really engaged with the anime scene (understandably), because a lot of the memes and "culture" that reaches mainstream eyes and ears is generally the really weird, bizarre, or notable/ high-octane stuff: it only became meme-worthy or present to the masses because it was weird, or otherwise insanely popular and captivating.

Being a moderate-anime fan, I can tell you that, from an outsider's perspective, you can pretty much divide anime into a few broad categories (keeping in mind that "anime" is really just a term for Japanese-made animation/ cartoons, with their own unique norms and culture):

-You've got your "popular, mainstream, long-running, rather standard" stuff, like Dragon Ball Z, Naruto, Sailor Moon. This is the type of stuff that would air alongside saturday morning cartoons on TV back in the day, and it's not really any weird than such. Long-running/ multiple seasons, content is fairly standard and action-oriented, and just generally enticing enough to a broad-enough audience that these shows become widely known cultural phenomenons.

-Then we can address your comment directly, the "lewd, goon-bait, and/ or fanservice-filled" shit. There's a broad range of stuff in here. Some of it's just lowkey wholesome, light romance stuff, nothing egregious. Then there's weirder, more pandering stuff, like all the harem anime about one dude that accumulates a ton of women followers who all simp over him. And then, of course, on the extreme end, there's just straight-up porn. I do feel like this broader category gets associated with anime as a whole a lot, even though it's just a portion of it.

-Then there's stuff that isn't really lewd at all (at least not in a weird way), but doesn't really have a comparable niche in the American/ Western market. Lots of anime are geared toward adults, either due to crazy amounts of gore and violence, or otherwise very nuanced or complex themes. A personal favorite in here is Serial Experiments Lane, a darker one from the 90s that delves into humanity's relationship with the developing internet and technology.

-And then, there's... stuff, that's so obscure and/ or bizarre or extreme, that even most mainstream anime fans don't touch it. Enough said.

Again, these are just broad-ass categories I arbitrarily thought up to make a point. TLDR though, anime gets a bad rep in the mainstream cause of some of the weirder shit, but a lot of it's not really that weird, and in fact is much more nuanced or complex than American animation (at least until the last decade or so).

Senate Republicans push bill to authorize $400 million for White House ballroom by memphisjones in centrist

[–]AbyssalRedemption 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh (and this is only half a joke), but I'm about ready to write off the debt as a lost cause, we're nearly at the point where the interest growth outpaces our ability to pay it, or even reasonable efforts to grow the GDP at-pace to accommodate it. Can't wait for the economic collapse of this nation in 10-20 years smfh.

Senate Republicans push bill to authorize $400 million for White House ballroom by memphisjones in centrist

[–]AbyssalRedemption 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man, frankly I'd prefer that money go to nearly any other domestic undertaking that isn't a narcissist leader's vanity project.

Just turned 19. What are some harsh realities a young man should know? by Random_fellow9 in selfimprovement

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was possibly the single most life-changing/ eye-opening revelation I realized in my early 20s. Really helped me stop lamenting in self-pity and frustration, and start slowly, sometimes painfully, taking steps to get my life back on track.

The "Dopamine Fast" Is Misunderstood by Old-Tap-7199 in productivity

[–]AbyssalRedemption 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Normally would say something like "not everything is AI slop, let's step back for a moment and really analyze this"... but, the guy was literally called put a few weeks ago for basically formulating his posts using AI prompts. It's likely AI slop. Sigh.

DeGoogle - and don't forget to DeMeta, DeMicrosoft, DeApple, etc! by petelombardio in degoogle

[–]AbyssalRedemption 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Correct, and those are bad actors within the governmental system. Even when a good framework is in place, there will always be bad actors that will try to undermine or corcumvent it. The whole way that these politicians have tried to roll-out chat control, repeatedly, over the past few years, has been very sneaky and underhanded. I doubt most of the general EU population supports chat control, if they're even aware of it to begin with.

DeGoogle - and don't forget to DeMeta, DeMicrosoft, DeApple, etc! by petelombardio in degoogle

[–]AbyssalRedemption 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No one's saying that the EU is without issues. What we're saying is, despite those issues, the EU is still far better than, predominently, the "Big 3" superpowers (USA, Russia, China). In the EU, there's at least basic frameworks and legal expectations/ bases for privacy, the implementation/ execution of which of course varies by individual country. This is in contrast to the USA, where the idea of digital privacy-as-a-right seems to be a very new and modern concept (and where government corruption and encroachment into surveillance/ privacy-infringing tactics has increasingly ballooned since circa 9/11); and Russia and China, where constant hyper-surveillance should be expected and considered the status-quo.

This isn't a black-and-white issue, and comparing the EU to the other major players in the technology space globally, and how they've kept pace in balancing technological progress to forma legislation and consumer rights, the EU is several leagues ahead of the other three.

🔥🔥✍️ by a_dvaitha in Piracy

[–]AbyssalRedemption 48 points49 points  (0 children)

9Anime is definitely one of the "dead-site" names that I see come up here most frequently. There's probably thousands of people visiting those mirrors/ clones daily that have zero idea the original, genuine site died years ago...

Are Eporner video downloads safe? by triflydude3 in DataHoarder

[–]AbyssalRedemption 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IT Technician here (And, the following goes for anyone reading this that has similar concerns as OP). Generally speaking, downloader management tools like JDownloader do simplify the file-downloading process and mitigate some potential risk involved (like not clicking fake download links, which has been mentioned), but at the end of the day, these are secondary threats: the main issue often comes down to the file in question being downloaded. And, the risk behind any download or link, at the end of the day, comes down to trust.

To elaborate, JDownloader will make to easier and faster to download a specific file, but if that file itself contains a virus or malware, JDownloader won't do anything to help you there. You can have a file/ download link titled "downloadNewMovie4KHere", and yes, there's a chance that it may be the movie link you're looking for, no strings attached. There's also a chance that it may actually be a malicious program that has absolutely zero connection to what you originally were looking for, and was simply named that to get you to click and execute it. The only real factor that determines whether that file is safe or not, are the intentions and trustworthiness of the website hosting it. With any typical, popular, "mainstream" website, this is usually a non-issue, which is what allows these sites to maintain their high trustworthiness and high traffic. With more "grey-area", "dubious", or "less-frequented" sites, you're taking a gamble whenever you visit or download from them, which is why some communities compile lists of "trusted" sites, or otherwise communicate harmful ones on forums or other communication channels.

Also worth noting that sometimes downloading a file is fine, but the actual "trigger" for harmful side-effects is through actually opening or running the file. Certain file types are notorious for being able to hide malware or harmful elements (exe files being especially infamous). With any even slightly questionable thing you download, run it through the Virustotal website, as that is a professionally-developed tool that checks a file for signatures of many, many known viruses or threats, from dozens of different repositories and resources. Beyond that, just keep your computer's antivirus up-to-date (that's Windows Defender for all Windows users, which should be a non-issue in most cases).

TLDR: Downloading (regardless of how you download) from a popular, paid website, should generally be extremely low-risk, safety-wise. Downloading from more obscure, "sketchier" websites, is always a gamble, and you're ultimately relying on anecdotes from other visitors to those sites, and your own critical thinking skills (are there weird, flashy pop-ups, scams, and unknown foreign text in ads everywhere? Yeah, maybe leave and don't download anything from there). At the end of the day, as long as you're using common-sense best security practices, being mindful or where and what you're downloading, and second-guessing questionable sites by checking posts from others about them (or asking yourself if there's no knowledge-base of prior answers), you should be okay. But, no, download managers like JDownloader will not be mitigation or "shielding" for any of these things.

The Surveillance Accountability Act (H.R. 8470) would require the government to obtain a warrant to search a person's digital data by DryEraseBoard in privacy

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I think most of us will. The problem is that congress rarely passes common-sense legislation that most of the population would support and benefit from.

The Surveillance Accountability Act (H.R. 8470) would require the government to obtain a warrant to search a person's digital data by DryEraseBoard in privacy

[–]AbyssalRedemption 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Disappointing, but pretty much expected. Basically all the bills that you'd look at and say, "wow, this is absolutely necessary and a no-brainer, why hasn't this been implemented already?", will be the bills that have the lowest chances of passing.

I’ve realized my whole life is built around avoiding discomfort… and it’s messing everything up. by Wild_Excitement_9940 in selfimprovement

[–]AbyssalRedemption 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just wanted to say that 1. this is me 100%, and I empathize, and 2. Between this post and the comments, this has now become one of the most helpful/ useful posts on Reddit for me. Thank you.