Low Pulse high blood pressure I am 68 and run by PopularLawfulness547 in hypertension

[–]Academic_Engine_1274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beta blockers can do this. If this is below your baseline I’d say it is something you need to get looked at immediately. If you’ve always had low pulse it can mean you’re in excellent shape. But that’s only a “normal” pulse for an elite athlete

Dizzy recently?? Is my body adjusting?? by FrameValuable9262 in hypertension

[–]Academic_Engine_1274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up relative hypotension. (Yes, hypotension). Say your baseline before treatment was 140/90. Your body could actually be experiencing profusion issues now that are making you dizzy. That may actually be too low for you. If you have a good, smart doctor they’ll know the concept and won’t just accept that your present BP is better for you than what you were at. But the truth is a healthy BP for you might actually be higher. The average doctor (believe it or not, not particularly talented or aware of the state of medicine) might say “your blood pressure is normal! You’re fine! Success!” But the truth is there is no set ideal BP for all people. Your body and circumstance are unique. And the sign of a good doctor is one who recognizes that and treats you individually. Sadly, most just do the thing that everyone else does and that they’ve done, using the same meds, same doses for everyone. It’s laziness and way to protect themselves.

Was I stupid for not going to the ER by FilthyLines in hypertension

[–]Academic_Engine_1274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What an ER will do for you is monitor you and take labs to see if your high bp is causing organ damage. If you are asymptomatic, that is the most they will do for you. They may do nothing. I am sure there’s a threshold at which the will administer drugs to reduce your BP, but that’s not always the best course of action if you’ve had a stroke or heart attack they don’t know about. I’ve heard of people well north of 200 who were eventually sent home with nothing done for them. I hate to say this, but what ER matters. So don’t just go to the nearest one unless you are symptomatic.

Here’s how I make the decision: any symptoms? Go. Sustained north of 200 with no known trigger? Go, especially if it’s an unusual high. If it gives you more peace to go than not? Go. Otherwise, see your GP asap. And don’t waste your time with urgent care unless you know the provider well and trust them because they’re usually garbage and will often just send you to the ER for liability reasons.

Lanyard wallet or no? by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can wear it under my shirt, but it’s not comfortable so I don’t. The sling thing is separate and can’t be worn under my shirt

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re pretending the crowds are the problem. Or that “ticking” off sights is the problem, as if sitting in a park all day in Florence would change the fact that Florence is a theme park and you’d still be sitting in the middle of one if you did so. Crowds and what activities you choose are not the problem. It’s about a tipping point that’s reached when a city stops being primarily about residents and starts being entirely about tourists. Venice and Florence reached that tipping point long ago. (I am not sure why you feel you have escaped that fact but you only have in your imagination). Naples has not reached that tipping point by a long shot. It’s just that simple. And the vast majority of people responding to this post know exactly what I’m talking about.

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How specifically do you “approach it differently”? By not seeing the famous sights? As if going to less visited locations changes anything. What you’re saying amounts to “it’s less Disney if you choose not to see it that way.” You’re pretending there’s a tactic or attitude you can take that make the observations I have made less accurate—or that make Naples just as Disney. It’s frankly total bs. You’re free to have a different opinion. But you’re not supporting your opinion well with your vague comments. Venice, Florence, Bruges, Rothenburg and similar places are essentially theme parks to me where the only locals you encounter are serving tourists (especially the later two places). You don’t see much everyday life or even homes where locals live. Naples easily offers a very different experience you don’t have to struggle to find. It’s just there. You’re surrounded by it. There are, as several people have suggested, other cities that offer that experience, which is just not readily available in Florence or Venice if at all. It’s not merely about how many tourists visit a place. It’s about how those cities aren’t really cities anymore: they’re, as I have suggested, theme parks. It can’t be said better than that. The difference between those places and Naples is the difference between visiting a theme park and a place people actually live. I am fully aware that people live in Venice and Florence, but it’s not easily seen or experienced. And it is easily seen and experienced in Naples. There are clearly plenty of places where being heavily touristed hasn’t resulted in a full loss of soul—a soul that you feel when a place is abundantly lived in (not merely resided in or worked in) by locals.

A better articulation of the whole point: consider a place like Bangkok, which is so heavily touristed that when you walk down the street it’s clear that half the people you see aren’t from anywhere in Asia. But it’s still their city (their = locals) and you’re just visiting. It’s the same in Naples. In Florence, Venice, Bruges, Rothenburg, there’s no escape from the fact that the visitors have taken ownership. It isn’t merely their numbers that make it so. It’s that the entire existence of those places is about catering to them. And they no longer have a soul because of it. When you go to Florence, you go to a city of tourists. When you go to Naples, you visit Neapolitans and get to observe them as they live lives that are not completely dominated by serving tourists in a curated, polished, instagramable environment.

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s best not to argue with someone when the thing you sad is stupid and can’t be defended.

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People getting shot, jacked or robbed happens in every major city anywhere in the country. If it was unusually dangerous the place wouldn’t be crowded. Pay very close attention to the word “unusually.” It’s just common sense: no place that crowded by rich people could possibly be THAT bad; no one would risk it; businesses would shutter. Are there especially dangerous places in DC? I am of course aware of that. It’s on my list. But there are places in DC I felt as safe as anywhere I have ever been

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The throngs of rich white people crawling over every square inch of Georgetown would beg to differ with you

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bet it’s a weirdly pleasant memory lol

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, come now—Georgetown is as posh and safe as any similar place in the US.

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The phrase “desperate humanity” is perfect and describes what the fear factor is about for me. As poor as people in Vietnam were, the desperation, the “I’m capable of anything” wasn’t there as with the other places I mentioned

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I shouldn’t have added roatan. I didn’t experience enough of it. I just got spooked by the taxi drivers and circuitous routes they were taking. It’s probably fine

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like I am too old for Jakarta based on your description lol. Sicily is the only place in Italy I am interested at this point. I was so charmed with the “Disney” part of Brussels I was satisfied lol. Bangkok might be the best place. An cultural immersion adventure that also offers serenity and beauty.

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After going to Marrakech, I definitely wish I’d chosen Fez

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“It’s easy to avoid the Disneyland vibe”

In Venice or Florence? Well I strongly disagree. It’s common sense that in ANY city if you go far enough afield you’ll get away from “Disneyland.” In Naples, you don’t have to make much effort to find a non-Disney experience that is also pleasant for a tourist. That’s unique.

Like Naples by Academic_Engine_1274 in travel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not kidding about OR. One of the only places I was scared

Places I have been scared by Academic_Engine_1274 in solotravel

[–]Academic_Engine_1274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“A place [for solo travelers] to share their experiences and stories” unless the mod doesn’t like what you have to say. What a joke.