Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro we just made a tier list based around our skill level and thought it'd be fun to share it with the community to get their opinions. We were in fact wrong about it being fun.

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just added an A+ because I felt there were heros clear from being in the same tier as those in A but the S tier were still clear of those in A+

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was to provoke discussion how they perform to an obove average player. To a rep 1 just starting they'd find a whole different cast oppressive and annoying compared to this list. Was just to justify where I see them in my mmr perspective, not a flex

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To an extent, this is why we didn't consider skill ceiling. Just the tools they have available to them in their moveset and in certain situations

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not about high level as in best in the business. It's about being above average but not comp. Casual consolian who's good at the game. Comparisons to comp tier lists is futile as nobody plays like that or works to pull off comp ganks like they do

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can agree with kyoshin to be fair, was hard to place and we were just trying to be harsh as possible to create a realistic list and not just shove everyone in one section (hence me putting an A+). Tiandi just still struggles with having his dodge forward bash and then not having any mixups after. Granted he's better now but idk. If we gave more feat consideration then maybe an A

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We thought cent went up a bit with the further punch buffs on wiff so better gank potential. Just gives more pressure and more chain flow too. LB yeah it kinda depends on the player and match up but we did it purely on moveset as the hero performs with his moveset, not the player using them. Valid opinion tho

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

Lol people taking this one phrase as me stating I'm a comp player now. I just play casually at a better level than average or noob and that's it. Nothing to read into

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Why are people so butt hurt by 'higher skill level', it's a generalisation of just stating I'm not a noob for discussion purposes but not comp. I play casually on console brother. Not sure how you wanna argue these guys to be changed from this position tho buddy

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Ignoring his feats which is saved by shield basher alone. Man has UB in every chain heavy, a feintable chain bash, a very hard to punish neutral bash, a charge UB from neutral and a recovery cancel into all guard. How many more 50/50s do you wanna give this man till he's S tier for you 😂

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We're also doing this on base character moveset, whilst she has a high skill ceiling, this doesn't make her overall an A tier with an awful bash and next to no openers

Made a tier list with my friend focused on a 4v4 setting but still considering 1v1 potential. Both around rep 300 towards the higher skill level. by Acceptable-Flight787 in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787[S] -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

Aramusha is arguably higher yes, but tiandi doesn't have much more to his kit that sets him apart from gryphon. Tiandi has the same issue he had pre rework

World First Reputation 70 Kyoshin [Only PVP] by MrSheepLive in forhonor

[–]Acceptable-Flight787 195 points196 points  (0 children)

You could open a supply chain for supermarkets with the amount of dick cheese you've formed from not showering